by brod » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:05 pm
by Bum Crack » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:08 pm
by OnSong » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:11 pm
Bum Crack wrote:That would have been a ripper game to watch, but unfortunately, I've already crossed the day off to wash my cat.
by gossipgirl » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:58 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:20 pm
gossipgirl wrote:I wonder how they work out which teams get to go ? Seems an unusual selection for an exhibition match
by fish » Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:26 pm
I think the selection criteria was:gossipgirl wrote:I wonder how they work out which teams get to go ? Seems an unusual selection for an exhibition match
by Booney » Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:55 pm
fish wrote:I think the selection criteria was:gossipgirl wrote:I wonder how they work out which teams get to go ? Seems an unusual selection for an exhibition match
underachieving low to mid-table rabble with a sad history and little chance of success in the near future
v
underachieving low to mid-table rabble with a sad history and little chance of success in the near future.
(apologies to the Western Bulldogs I don't really think you're that bad)
by RustyCage » Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:25 pm
by fish » Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:43 pm
I know that Port Power have been in the comp for almost 16 years for one Premiership. Dominated the comp for four or five years in the early 2000's but won just one flag as a result of their tendency to choke in September. Did buggerall in the years before that and have done buggerall since...Booney wrote:fish wrote:I think the selection criteria was:gossipgirl wrote:I wonder how they work out which teams get to go ? Seems an unusual selection for an exhibition match
underachieving low to mid-table rabble with a sad history and little chance of success in the near future
v
underachieving low to mid-table rabble with a sad history and little chance of success in the near future.
(apologies to the Western Bulldogs I don't really think you're that bad)
Sad history? Bit rich from you fish. You know much about football clubs with history?
by overloaded » Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:05 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Barto » Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:46 pm
fish wrote:I know that Port Power have been in the comp for almost 16 years for one Premiership. Dominated the comp for four or five years in the early 2000's but won just one flag as a result of their tendency to choke in September. Did buggerall in the years before that and have done buggerall since...Booney wrote:fish wrote:I think the selection criteria was:gossipgirl wrote:I wonder how they work out which teams get to go ? Seems an unusual selection for an exhibition match
underachieving low to mid-table rabble with a sad history and little chance of success in the near future
v
underachieving low to mid-table rabble with a sad history and little chance of success in the near future.
(apologies to the Western Bulldogs I don't really think you're that bad)
Sad history? Bit rich from you fish. You know much about football clubs with history?
by fish » Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:16 pm
by Media Park » Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:48 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by fish » Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:43 pm
I thought it was Port Power playing, not Port Magpies?overloaded wrote:27 behind fish...... just remember that!
by GWW » Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:05 pm
fish wrote:I know that Port Power have been in the comp for almost 16 years for one Premiership. Dominated the comp for four or five years in the early 2000's but won just one flag as a result of their tendency to choke in September. Did buggerall in the years before that and have done buggerall since...Booney wrote:fish wrote:I think the selection criteria was:gossipgirl wrote:I wonder how they work out which teams get to go ? Seems an unusual selection for an exhibition match
underachieving low to mid-table rabble with a sad history and little chance of success in the near future
v
underachieving low to mid-table rabble with a sad history and little chance of success in the near future.
(apologies to the Western Bulldogs I don't really think you're that bad)
Sad history? Bit rich from you fish. You know much about football clubs with history?
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:16 pm
by fish » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:19 pm
Maybe they could do a $2 tin-rattle campaign like their poor cousins in the SANFL did a few years back!Jim05 wrote:Obviously this junket is fully paid for by the AFL, in Port's current situation they would be struggling to afford to go to the London Tavern
by Squawk » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:39 am
Jim05 wrote:Obviously this junket is fully paid for by the AFL, in Port's current situation they would be struggling to afford to go to the London Tavern
by whufc » Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:26 am
Squawk wrote:Jim05 wrote:Obviously this junket is fully paid for by the AFL, in Port's current situation they would be struggling to afford to go to the London Tavern
Yeah, exactly my thoughts too.
I also want to know what this means for the SANFL clubs in terms of player availability for finals.
by stan » Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:58 am
Media Park wrote:Twice in a day the PAFC footy history has been brought up![]()
VFL/AFL is the same comp, well, not the current VFL, the one before the AFL was made.
SANFL was never the same tier of competition, nor the QAFL or WAFL, Pt Adel has a bucket load of SANFL flags, and one AFL flag also, but that is all.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |