Page 1 of 2
Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:46 pm
by CoverKing
Thomas cops 2 weeks can't be reduced.
Lower and ziebell both got 3 weeks
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:53 pm
by Booney
Live at the ground, Ziebell's looked horrible, really terrible. 3 weeks seems unders for mine.
Kudos to the lad in the Roos clobber sitting nearby with his Dad.
St's fan - "You're gone Ziebell!!"
Roo Dad - "Get up Reiwoldt, you sook!"
Boon - "Sook? hahaha thats Gold ya peanut"
Roo kid ( about 15 or 16 with the emo fringe ) - "What do you know about the game mate? He was trying to jump over him!"
Boon - "I know they aren't playing leap frog out there......"
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:08 pm
by best on hill
CoverKing wrote:Thomas cops 2 weeks can't be reduced.
Lower and ziebell both got 3 weeks
any word on greenwood?
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:10 pm
by OnSong
best on hill wrote:CoverKing wrote:Thomas cops 2 weeks can't be reduced.
Lower and ziebell both got 3 weeks
any word on greenwood?
Can't burn it very well.
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:11 pm
by valleys07
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:13 pm
by best on hill
OnSong wrote:best on hill wrote:CoverKing wrote:Thomas cops 2 weeks can't be reduced.
Lower and ziebell both got 3 weeks
any word on greenwood?
Can't burn it very well.
ok what about levi? nice jeans

Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:37 pm
by Jim05
Greenwood and Armitage got 1 week
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:54 pm
by best on hill
Jim05 wrote:Greenwood and Armitage got 1 week
they have to sort this bullshit out in regards to the sling tackle other wise it will get to the stage were they will rub the ruckman camron wood from the magpies out for attempting to mark and knocking out and rearranging the face of the young freo player(name escapes me at the moment) i hope it never gets to that but we seem to be going down that road

Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:49 pm
by Jim05
Melbourne media is running a story alleging the Crows squealed to the AFL about a tackle made by Jake King on Andy Otten. The AFL went back over the tape and have now suspended King for 2 games.
Disgraceful if true. How can the AFL watch the tape and find no incidents worthy of report and then go back over it later?
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:56 pm
by NO-MERCY
They are known to squeal arn't they? Wasn't the Birdman a squealer?
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:13 pm
by Jim05
NO-MERCY wrote:They are known to squeal arn't they? Wasn't the Birdman a squealer?
Yes he was.
The Crows also squealed in the Trengove sling tackle incident.
Will come back to bite them one day
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:32 pm
by saintal
Jim05 wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:They are known to squeal arn't they? Wasn't the Birdman a squealer?
Yes he was.
The Crows also squealed in the Trengove sling tackle incident.
Will come back to bite them one day
The Choir Boy Crows.
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:36 pm
by gossipgirl
pretty simple really dont do the crime if you dont want to do the time

Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:42 pm
by Rik E Boy
NO-MERCY wrote:They are known to squeal arn't they? Wasn't the Birdman a squealer?
Just like Didak in Hudson's car.
regards,
REB
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:48 pm
by FOURTH ESTATE
A disgraceful act by a bunch sore losing sooks.
Telling an AFL official that they missed one. If the Match Review Panel didn't see it then play on but to dob a player in is weak and pathetic.
Gee the corporate boys at Turner drive must be feeling good about themselves.
Go ahead and appoint Mark Bickley an inside flunky for the members of the Adelaide Club who live in the dark ages. You have beaten nobody this year. May you sink in the swamp at West Lakes as Don Bradman said.
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:30 pm
by Media Park
Goddard made a comment in the paper about the Ziebell tackle being reckless... Before it got to the review panel...
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:24 pm
by Rik E Boy
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:A disgraceful act by a bunch sore losing sooks.
Telling an AFL official that they missed one. If the Match Review Panel didn't see it then play on but to dob a player in is weak and pathetic.
Gee the corporate boys at Turner drive must be feeling good about themselves.
Go ahead and appoint Mark Bickley an inside flunky for the members of the Adelaide Club who live in the dark ages. You have beaten nobody this year. May you sink in the swamp at West Lakes as Don Bradman said.
LMAO No one does bitter better than a Richmond Tiger. Kudos to you sir!
regards,
REB
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:38 pm
by Booney
Well if anyone has grown accustomed to viewing things from the dark ages, its a Richmond fan.
Anyway, King only got 2 weeks, yes? Seems a reasonable compromise as I was thinking lethal injection.
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:44 pm
by Rik E Boy
Booney wrote:Well if anyone has grown accustomed to viewing things from the dark ages, its a Richmond fan.
Anyway, King only got 2 weeks, yes? Seems a reasonable compromise as I was thinking lethal injection.
You could always chop his head off...too late someone's already done that.
regards,
REB
Re: Rd 23 tribunal

Posted:
Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:17 pm
by howzat
saintal wrote:Jim05 wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:They are known to squeal arn't they? Wasn't the Birdman a squealer?
Yes he was.
The Crows also squealed in the Trengove sling tackle incident.
Will come back to bite them one day
The Choir Boy Crows.
what else would you expect from a bunch of softXXXXX known as the cows....