Mercenaries

Talk on the national game

Mercenaries

Postby SABRE » Wed Jun 29, 2011 3:40 pm

Normally I couldn’t give a finger load of snot for problems in the Artificial Football League, but I can’t help wondering if
too many foreigners in our plastic teams are the reason for such dismal results. When the fledgling Crows in their very
first battle were thrown up against eventual premier Hawthorn, our locally grown boys stuck it up ‘em like a vet’s
thermometer up a shaky Shih Tzu. The Vic’s didn’t know what hit ‘em, you could hear their clackers clicking at Bordertown.

So that leaves 3 questions …..

1) Do imported players REALLY bleed for the jumper and give 110% at all times for the club AND South Australia ?
2) What is the ratio of home grown/mercenary players in the Crows/Power line-ups ?
3) Could this be the REAL performance problem ?

:-k
Last edited by SABRE on Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
NFC 2021
User avatar
SABRE
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Beyond Redemption
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby RustyCage » Wed Jun 29, 2011 3:54 pm

SABRE wrote:Normally I couldn’t give a finger load of snot for problems in the Artificial Football League, but I can’t help wondering if
too many foreigners in our plastic teams are the reason for such dismal results. When the fledgling Crows in their very
first battle were thrown up against reigning premier Hawthorn, our locally grown boys stuck it up ‘em like a vet’s
thermometer up a shaky Shih Tzu. The Vic’s didn’t know what hit ‘em, you could hear their clackers clicking at Bordertown.

So that leaves 3 questions …..

1) Do imported players REALLY bleed for the jumper and give 110% at all times for the club AND South Australia ?
2) What is the ratio of home grown/mercenary players in the Crows/Power line-ups ?
3) Could this be the REAL performance problem ?

:-k


How many Qlders were in Brisbanes team 01-03? What about port, syd and west coast in 04-06? I don't think where a player comes from makes any difference. Port Adelaide play for the club and supporters, and Adelaide plays for its club and supporters. The players don't walk off the ground thinking "We have won for our state" and nor should they. Port and the Crows don't represent the state league of the state they play in.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15300
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1267 times
Been liked: 937 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby CK » Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:47 pm

If this scenario was really the case, then the English Premier League would have a fair few issues.
Can you guess where I'm calling from, the Las Vegas Hilton...
CK
Veteran
 
Posts: 3612
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:10 am
Location: At an SANFL game near you.
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby JK » Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:49 pm

CK wrote:If this scenario was really the case, then the English Premier League would have a fair few issues.


NBA, NFL, MLB, NRL, NBL etc, etc.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Mercenaries

Postby Gingernuts » Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:56 pm

I don't think it's necessarily a performance issue, but I do think a 'tool' that could be used to squeeze out an extra 10% for victory has been lost by the dillution of 'local' playing lists.

On a similar note - I think SA born/raised players and coaches have a much better understanding of the place AFC/PAFC has within South Australian culture, and that this would be an advantage to them in dealing with off field pressures (ie - one paper town, increased scrutiny of performance, increased recognition by general public on the street).
User avatar
Gingernuts
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek

Re: Mercenaries

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:11 pm

So a 17 year old kid from Victoria is a mercenary if he gets drafted to an interstate club? I think most of them would prefer playing for a club in their home state.

When players request a transfer, more often than not it's to go back home. Adelaide has a few "back home" in their team.

Every year clubs put up players for trade, or offer players more money to play at their club. So the majority of the time, it's the clubs own doing.

Good on blokes like Ablett jnr, Bock, Krakeur etc for going where the money is good. The AFL has just made 1.5 Billion, (and counting), for TV rights for the next 5 years, thanks to the footballers.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby Hondo » Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:36 pm

If you are drafted to a team outside your home state and paid the basic minimam salary for first year players how does that make you a mercenary?

Also, "mercanaries" played important roles in the Crows and Power premierships: Caven, Stevens, Connell, Johnson, Thiessen (Crows); Hardwick, Carr, Montgomery, Schofield, Bishop, Mahoney, Cassisi (Port).

Chris Judd did reasonably well at West Coast too from memory

Mick O'Loughlin, Fosdike and Crouch bled appropriately for the Swans in their 2005 premiership team despite being SA boys.

There's many other examples I could give.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby Q. » Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:51 pm

This belongs in the 'Regionals' :lol:
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Mercenaries

Postby GWW » Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:53 pm

I think the 2 SA clubs' current lack of success relates to:

- poor list management/drafting
- bad administrative decisions
- limited amount of early draft picks
- unfavourable father-son rule as it applies to them
- low crowds resulting in decreased "crowd factor"
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15675
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 816 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby Hondo » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:28 pm

GWW, I'd add the inability to be able to attract South Australian born players back from interstate clubs via trades

I think since the 90s the overall package of being a footballer in Melbourne is far more attractive (be it media work, sponsorships, being in the centre of the AFL universe, probably other opportunities) than returning to Adelaide to play for the Crows or Power. I don't think a Darren Jarman type would come back home these days.

I know the Crows made a huge play for Ryan Griffin last year. No cigar.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby westozfalcon » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:10 pm

There should be a zonal component in recruiting whereby teams get priority to draft players developed in their state.

Remember the West Coast Eagles in the early 1990's? The team was almost totally made up of Western Australian players. They were playing for Western Australian pride and would crawl over broken glass for the Black Swan. Their performances bore testimony to this too.

The tribal element has been lost in the AFL and and the system should change so that Western Australian, South Australian, Queensland, NSW and Victorian teams get priority access to players from their state.

"But what about Victoria" I hear people say " There are too many teams there to share the Victorian players around"?

And therein lies a problem that blind Freddie has been able to see for years......there are too many AFL teams based in Victoria.
westozfalcon
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Perth WA
Has liked: 113 times
Been liked: 28 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby Q. » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:19 pm

If an AFL coach is relying on emotion to string wins together, he's in the wrong business.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Mercenaries

Postby SABRE » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:57 pm

Please try not to see the word 'mercenary' as having overtly negative connotations.
It is simply a description of a paid professional who goes into battle with or for locals at a price or benefit.
I see the system forced upon us as being at fault, not so much the players who are unfairly told where to go.

Are true blue, heart felt, local talent more effective when push comes to shove and the going gets really tough ?
Personally, I think the old 'State Of Origin' standard proves this point beyond any and all argument.
People loved going to these games to see their very own men do battle with those from other SANFL clubs.
That's where the mega-crowds used to be !

Could more local content help the falling standard of the un-AFL and help positive Crow/Power outcomes ?
At local SANFL clubs, a couple of imports become locals very quickly and often for good. Are there just too many
'ring ins' at un-AFL clubs to get excited about, thus a huge drop in parochial crowd interest and numbers ?

IMHO Victoria simply MUST be made to produce their own talent. With 4 or more times the population of some other states
they have no right whatsoever to pinch interstate players. Indeed, they should be supplying a glut to non Aussie Rules
states in the so-called AFL, with SA and WA only supplying their own player numbers.

Cheers to all responders. Maybe my disgust of all things 'pretend-AFL' suggests I should return to SANFL threads only.
Sorry to impose.
;)
NFC 2021
User avatar
SABRE
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Beyond Redemption
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby Q. » Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:09 am

Why didn't the Crows or Power recognise the talent of Lower, Puopolo, Duigan etc? It's not like those players are rookies.


I think it's funny that SANFL die-hards use terms like 'pretend-AFL' or 'Artificial Football League' when SANFL coaches are using game-plans that AFL coaches have long discarded. SANFL game plans aren't 'real' football, it's just catch-up football.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Mercenaries

Postby SABRE » Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:30 am

Quichey wrote:Why didn't the Crows or Power recognise the talent of Lower, Puopolo, Duigan etc? It's not like those players are rookies.
Agreed 'Q', you betcha, they should have been.

Quichey wrote:I think it's funny that SANFL die-hards use terms like 'pretend-AFL' or 'Artificial Football League' when SANFL coaches are using game-plans that AFL coaches have long discarded. SANFL game plans aren't 'real' football, it's just catch-up football.
Can't apologise for the terminology mate, how many of these game plans were stolen from outside Victoria along with all the players ?
;)
NFC 2021
User avatar
SABRE
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Beyond Redemption
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby JK » Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:10 am

Quichey wrote:I think it's funny that SANFL die-hards use terms like 'pretend-AFL' or 'Artificial Football League' when SANFL coaches are using game-plans that AFL coaches have long discarded. SANFL game plans aren't 'real' football, it's just catch-up football.


In some cases yes, but in some cases SANFL clubs can have a unique aspect to their game because there's things in the SANFL you can get away with, that a team hasn't been able to since the 70's or 80's in the VFL/AFL.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Mercenaries

Postby sapaul » Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:39 am

SABRE wrote:When the fledgling Crows in their very first battle were thrown up against reigning premier Hawthorn, our locally grown boys stuck it up ‘em like a vet’s
thermometer up a shaky Shih Tzu.


Being pedantic as Hawthorn did win alot back then but they didn't in 1990. ;)
sapaul
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2118
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:01 pm
Location: Whyalla
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: South Whyalla

Re: Mercenaries

Postby SABRE » Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:31 am

sapaul wrote:
SABRE wrote:When the fledgling Crows in their very first battle were thrown up against reigning premier Hawthorn, our locally grown boys stuck it up ‘em like a vet’s
thermometer up a shaky Shih Tzu.


Being pedantic as Hawthorn did win alot back then but they didn't in 1990. ;)

Cheers for that 'sapaul'. Quite right. I should have said the club that was the Premier in 1991 shouldn't I.
Time for a quick edit eh?
;)
Done.
Wish I could remember where I left my memory tablets LOL
NFC 2021
User avatar
SABRE
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Beyond Redemption
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Mercenaries

Postby Q. » Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:23 am

JK wrote:
Quichey wrote:I think it's funny that SANFL die-hards use terms like 'pretend-AFL' or 'Artificial Football League' when SANFL coaches are using game-plans that AFL coaches have long discarded. SANFL game plans aren't 'real' football, it's just catch-up football.


In some cases yes, but in some cases SANFL clubs can have a unique aspect to their game because there's things in the SANFL you can get away with, that a team hasn't been able to since the 70's or 80's in the VFL/AFL.


I can only comment on recent seasons. I don't think SANFL coaches are pushing the envelope of revolutionary game plans, however, they are limited by the inferior skills set & fitness base of their playing group (compared to AFL standard). Some do work very well within their means though.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Mercenaries

Postby Q. » Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:31 am

SABRE wrote:
Quichey wrote:I think it's funny that SANFL die-hards use terms like 'pretend-AFL' or 'Artificial Football League' when SANFL coaches are using game-plans that AFL coaches have long discarded. SANFL game plans aren't 'real' football, it's just catch-up football.
Can't apologise for the terminology mate, how many of these game plans were stolen from outside Victoria along with all the players ?
;)


Admittedly I can only get to a few SANFL games a year, but I doubt that AFL coaches are stealing much from their playbooks!

If the SA teams fail to recognise the talent of SANFL players and/or fail to develop SA recruits, then why punish interstate teams who do recognise the talent and are better at developing them into good elite level players.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Next

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |