SA AFL licences

Talk on the national game

SA AFL licences

Postby stan » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:09 am

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/san ... 6069372668

This is interesting but not really a surpirse. $27Mill of debt will do this to you.

But in my opinion the crows will do well from this, and also Port will probably also be better off. Basically if Port can get hold of the licence and I'm not sure how as they have a cash flow problem, then this would open up an immediate move to Adelaide oval and hence a better stadium "deal".
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15440
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1309 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: SA AFL licences

Postby JK » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:38 am

Good move I reckon
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: SA AFL licences

Postby stan » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:44 am

Constance_Perm wrote:Good move I reckon


Yeah well like I said for the crows this will be exactly what they need to become a finanical powerhouse because they have plenty of members and get great numbers to there games. So you know with some some business development they could really start to build. For Port this would give them a chance to move forward with a move away from the SANFL.

Also other winners will be SACA, football will make its way to Adelaide oval very quickly.

But the big problem is the SANFL will probably need to work out what they are doing wrong to get themselves so badly in debt.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15440
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1309 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: SA AFL licences

Postby Jim05 » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:48 am

About time. Ive said it since day 1, charge the clubs rent at AAMI and live of the profits. The SANFL is in a win/win, wait to port move to AO then they can jack up the stadium deal.
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48093
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3788 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: SA AFL licences

Postby JK » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:52 am

To my simple mind, it should have benefit for the SANFL cometition also .. If the clubs own their own licenses and then need any assistance, that's up to the AFL to provide it and they wont have as much pull over the SANFL (as they currently do as license holders)
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: SA AFL licences

Postby gadj1976 » Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:10 am

Please pardon my ignorance, I haven't followed the licence thing particularly closely.

So currently the SANFL own them and have a huge debt.

If the SANFL sell the licences, what does it gain? (Obviously an injection of cash)

What long term benefits?

If the clubs buy the AFL licences from the clubs, what do they gain?

What long term benefits?
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9260
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 800 times
Been liked: 870 times

Re: SA AFL licences

Postby JK » Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:25 am

gadj1976 wrote:Please pardon my ignorance, I haven't followed the licence thing particularly closely.

So currently the SANFL own them and have a huge debt.

If the SANFL sell the licences, what does it gain? (Obviously an injection of cash)

What long term benefits?

If the clubs buy the AFL licences from the clubs, what do they gain?

What long term benefits?


From my limited understanding mate ...

1. Cash injection, and losing the responsibility for financial assistance/obligation to the clubs (ie, the SANFL loses the need to protect the licenses as they no longer own them)

2. Long term benefits are that the AFL clubs have more financial capacity, as any $ earnt over break even point on matchday (at any stadium) is revenue solely returning to the club (and not a SANFL dividend) ... The money the SANFL would receive for the licenses should fill an interim void until the AO move takes place (at which time $$ are generated and returned to the SANFL and it's clubs via the land at West Lakes, effectively replacing the current dividends).
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: SA AFL licences

Postby FlyingHigh » Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:21 pm

That is staggering if the Power has only collected 20% of it's sponsorship revenue. Why? Who is respnsible for that? No dubt the SANFL's fault too somehow.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: SA AFL licences

Postby Hondo » Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:46 pm

I agree it seems a good move

It seems like the SANFL are too exposed to the financial fortunes of 2 clubs that play in a different competition than the one they control and run. Too exposed and at times too distracted. It's too many layers of management like Councils and the State Govt can end up with on certain issues. Too much cash disappears inadmin costs.

The SANFL have reaped from the good times but now in tougher times it is taking on responsibility for problems that are to some extent out of their control. They can't directly control the on field form of the Crows and Power and have no say on issues like live against the gate TV coverage. Yes, they can appoint directors to the boards of the AFL clubs but then they get into this conflict of interest between looking after the AFL teams and the SANFL comp leading to inevitable criticisms that by trying to manage both they manage neither very well.

The current set up has allowed the AFL to step back from any problems and leave them with the SANFL as license holder.

If the SANFL can get profit out of the redevelopment of the land at West Lakes and a share of the profits from the AO then they can get back to focussing on the SANFL competition and leave the underwriting of the Crows and Power to the AFL, as it should be IMO.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times


Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |