Page 1 of 1
Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Sun May 22, 2011 7:53 pmby Mr66
St Kilda or the Western Bulldogs
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Sun May 22, 2011 8:24 pmby gadj1976
The Bullies by a fair margin
They topped up leading into this year, Sherman, Everitt and I really thought they were in for a tilt. They're inconsistent (which in itself is ok) but they're best is good, their worst is terrible and their injury list is bad, cos it's all in the wrong places (FB, FF, midfield (Cooney not fit etc, etc)).
The Saints at least have the structure and I can still see them making the 8. Bullies, not sure if they can make it now.
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Sun May 22, 2011 9:45 pmby westozfalcon
The Western Bulldogs have been easily the more disappointing of the two.
St Kilda lost Lenny Hayes to a season-ending injury and had some pre-season 'issues' that were eating away at morale yet they are still hanging in there.
The Bulldogs beat up on weak sides Gold Coast and Brisbane early in the season yet have been found wanting against only half-decent opposition.
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Sun May 22, 2011 11:39 pmby CoverKing
gadj1976 wrote:The Bullies by a fair margin
They topped up leading into this year, Sherman, Everitt and I really thought they were in for a tilt. They're inconsistent (which in itself is ok) but they're best is good, their worst is terrible and their injury list is bad, cos it's all in the wrong places (FB, FF, midfield (Cooney not fit etc, etc)).
The Saints at least have the structure and I can still see them making the 8. Bullies, not sure if they can make it now.
Everitt left them, not joined them this year mate.
They picked up Barlow, Sherman, Djekkura and Vezspremi from what i remember
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 8:53 amby Rik E Boy
CoverKing wrote:gadj1976 wrote:The Bullies by a fair margin
They topped up leading into this year, Sherman, Everitt and I really thought they were in for a tilt. They're inconsistent (which in itself is ok) but they're best is good, their worst is terrible and their injury list is bad, cos it's all in the wrong places (FB, FF, midfield (Cooney not fit etc, etc)).
The Saints at least have the structure and I can still see them making the 8. Bullies, not sure if they can make it now.
Everitt left them, not joined them this year mate.
They picked up Barlow, Sherman, Djekkura and Vezspremi from what i remember
None of those blokes are any good......
regards,
REB
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 2:25 pmby CoverKing
Rik E Boy wrote:CoverKing wrote:gadj1976 wrote:The Bullies by a fair margin
They topped up leading into this year, Sherman, Everitt and I really thought they were in for a tilt. They're inconsistent (which in itself is ok) but they're best is good, their worst is terrible and their injury list is bad, cos it's all in the wrong places (FB, FF, midfield (Cooney not fit etc, etc)).
The Saints at least have the structure and I can still see them making the 8. Bullies, not sure if they can make it now.
Everitt left them, not joined them this year mate.
They picked up Barlow, Sherman, Djekkura and Vezspremi from what i remember
None of those blokes are any good......
regards,
REB
sherman is the only quality one in that lot IMO
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 2:43 pmby Rik E Boy
Sherman is rubbish.
regards,
REB
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 2:46 pmby Baron Greenback
Na I agree with REB. None of them are much chop.
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 3:50 pmby CoverKing
He is quality compared to that lot. I think Sherman is alright, although has a bit of Marc Murphy, Brad Johnson and Brent Harvey about him. Once near goals, a pass to a teammate is never going to happen
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 4:19 pmby Rik E Boy
Yeah he is just like those blokes you mentioned.....minus the talent.
regards,
REB
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 5:09 pmby gadj1976
CoverKing wrote:gadj1976 wrote:The Bullies by a fair margin
They topped up leading into this year, Sherman, Everitt and I really thought they were in for a tilt. They're inconsistent (which in itself is ok) but they're best is good, their worst is terrible and their injury list is bad, cos it's all in the wrong places (FB, FF, midfield (Cooney not fit etc, etc)).
The Saints at least have the structure and I can still see them making the 8. Bullies, not sure if they can make it now.
Everitt left them, not joined them this year mate.
They picked up Barlow, Sherman, Djekkura and Vezspremi from what i remember
Vezspremi was the one I was thinking of. Cheers CK.
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 5:12 pmby CoverKing
gadj1976 wrote:CoverKing wrote:gadj1976 wrote:The Bullies by a fair margin
They topped up leading into this year, Sherman, Everitt and I really thought they were in for a tilt. They're inconsistent (which in itself is ok) but they're best is good, their worst is terrible and their injury list is bad, cos it's all in the wrong places (FB, FF, midfield (Cooney not fit etc, etc)).
The Saints at least have the structure and I can still see them making the 8. Bullies, not sure if they can make it now.
Everitt left them, not joined them this year mate.
They picked up Barlow, Sherman, Djekkura and Vezspremi from what i remember
Vezspremi was the one I was thinking of. Cheers CK.
Think it was a straight swap from memory? everitt for vezspremi?
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 5:52 pmby Dog_ger
Would have to be the Saints for mine
Re: Who has has fallen further?
Posted:
Tue May 24, 2011 9:43 pmby bayman
after watching the wce v wb match last week i'd say wb as they looked like a rabble