Page 1 of 1

Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 4:43 pm
by X Runna
Seriously, why would you bother? What a perfect opportunity to get rid of him, even if only for the one week. :-??

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 4:54 pm
by Dirko
Hope he plays. Gives the Blues a better chance.

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 5:18 pm
by saintal
Wont be too upset if he gets rubbed out given his form.

Sam Jacobs very lucky with his hit on Gram I thought.

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 5:47 pm
by Johno6
http://www.afl.com.au/video/tabid/76/co ... fault.aspx


tippets was the same.............................. and he got off..


(it has tippet striking chris knights in the details on video)

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 7:19 pm
by tigerland09
Dawsons appeal was unsuccessful, is only gonna miss this weeks game.

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 7:56 pm
by Brodlach
Johno6 wrote:http://www.afl.com.au/video/tabid/76/contentid/350999/default.aspx


tippets was the same.............................. and he got off..


(it has tippet striking chris knights in the details on video)



Tippet didnt get off, because of his early guilty plea and five year clean record he didnt have enough points to get a game. Carries over 93 points if there is a next time.

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:08 pm
by fish
tigerland09 wrote:Dawsons appeal was unsuccessful, is only gonna miss this weeks game.
He will be missing the rest of the season in my Supercoach team - I'll be trading him out on Thursday night.

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:27 pm
by Rik E Boy
SJABC wrote:Hope he plays. Gives the Blues a better chance.


Knowing the Saints' luck they'll get him off.

regards,

REB

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:22 am
by CUTTERMAN
saintal wrote:Wont be too upset if he gets rubbed out given his form.

Sam Jacobs very lucky with his hit on Gram I thought.

Jacobs' whole arm was tucked into his side, he made initial contact with Gram's side/shoulder which was his intention during this there's unintentional high contact resulting in no injury.
The only reason why he could be seen as being lucky is the outcomes decided on by the Jeckyll and Hyde review committee.

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:47 am
by D14
CUTTERMAN wrote:
saintal wrote:Wont be too upset if he gets rubbed out given his form.

Sam Jacobs very lucky with his hit on Gram I thought.

Jacobs' whole arm was tucked into his side, he made initial contact with Gram's side/shoulder which was his intention during this there's unintentional high contact resulting in no injury.
The only reason why he could be seen as being lucky is the outcomes decided on by the Jeckyll and Hyde review committee.


I guess a ruckman isn't allowed to put on a shepherd anymore... :roll:

Re: Saints challenging Zac Dawson ban

PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:55 am
by Johno6
Brodlach wrote:
Johno6 wrote:http://www.afl.com.au/video/tabid/76/contentid/350999/default.aspx


tippets was the same.............................. and he got off..


(it has tippet striking chris knights in the details on video)



Tippet didnt get off, because of his early guilty plea and five year clean record he didnt have enough points to get a game. Carries over 93 points if there is a next time.



sorry brod i will explain myself better...

what i was trying to say is he did same thing as he punched chris knights aswell... coz that was what was on the MRP video.


i wasnt saying he got off his report.