Why oh why?

Talk on the national game

Why oh why?

Postby JK » Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:15 pm

2 Free kicks Ive seen this weekend that I was just gobsmacked about ..

1. Hall jogging back to position past Thompson gives a short forearm jab to Thompson's bicep - Whistle blows, no bounce up but free kick in the centre to the Roo's.

2. Skipper and Trengrove at AAMI on Saturday .. Skipper gives a small warning, slap, insignificant whatever, so Trengrove responds with the most minor of slaps/whatever - Result free-kick and The Hawks get a shot on goal.

The contested footy in the game today as the hardest I've ever seen it, so Im certainly not labelling the game soft, but why oh why do the law makers have to take everything to the nth degree??? :(
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37459
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Interceptor » Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:49 pm

You're right, the directives the umpires are now given by that muppett Gieschen are just a joke.

At least with the second case there, the commentators were unified in their condemnation of the decision.
Maybe the umpiring fraternity will get the message...

There was another really soft free given in the Brisbane-Melbourne where Rockliff gave his opponent a slight shove after a contest and a free was given, with a goal resulting. It's true it was undisciplined, but didn't warrant a free in my opinion.
User avatar
Interceptor
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2987
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: London, UK
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby FlyingHigh » Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:39 am

Or how about the reversal against Rioli in the old scoreboard pocket (the original free to Franklin for HTB was a joke anyway) where he leant on the Power players' shoulder to steady himself getting up off the ground?
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4909
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Drop Bear » Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:04 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:2 Free kicks Ive seen this weekend that I was just gobsmacked about ..

1. Hall jogging back to position past Thompson gives a short forearm jab to Thompson's bicep - Whistle blows, no bounce up but free kick in the centre to the Roo's.


I saw that one against Hall. The umps continue to think it's all about them. Disgraceful.
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:10 pm

Drop Bear wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:2 Free kicks Ive seen this weekend that I was just gobsmacked about ..

1. Hall jogging back to position past Thompson gives a short forearm jab to Thompson's bicep - Whistle blows, no bounce up but free kick in the centre to the Roo's.


I saw that one against Hall. The umps continue to think it's all about them. Disgraceful.


That's my complaint about umpires, they appear to think the crowd is only there to watch them umpire. I watch little AFL, but when I do tune in, I see umpires confusing the hell out of the players, the spectators, etc, and if I watch long enough I will hear some rule I've never heard before in my 40 plus years in the game.

I'm still getting over Osborne's "unrealistic leap", when the guy who was penalised was the only player to get his hands on the ball. Watching AFL is the only time I wished I took drugs or drank heavily, because you need them to enjoy the game.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:43 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:I'm still getting over Osborne's "unrealistic leap", when the guy who was penalised was the only player to get his hands on the ball.


That was the worst decision I have ever seen. A joke.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28527
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1769 times
Been liked: 1881 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby MAY-Z » Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:13 pm

Drop Bear wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:2 Free kicks Ive seen this weekend that I was just gobsmacked about ..

1. Hall jogging back to position past Thompson gives a short forearm jab to Thompson's bicep - Whistle blows, no bounce up but free kick in the centre to the Roo's.


I saw that one against Hall. The umps continue to think it's all about them. Disgraceful.


that was one of the best decisions of the season - this prevented another situation like what happened when the teams met earlier this season and another baker / s johnson incident
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Drop Bear » Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:14 pm

MAY-Z wrote:
Drop Bear wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:2 Free kicks Ive seen this weekend that I was just gobsmacked about ..

1. Hall jogging back to position past Thompson gives a short forearm jab to Thompson's bicep - Whistle blows, no bounce up but free kick in the centre to the Roo's.


I saw that one against Hall. The umps continue to think it's all about them. Disgraceful.


that was one of the best decisions of the season - this prevented another situation like what happened when the teams met earlier this season and another baker / s johnson incident


Contact, pass or shot.
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Why oh why?

Postby MAY-Z » Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:18 pm

Drop Bear wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:
Drop Bear wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:2 Free kicks Ive seen this weekend that I was just gobsmacked about ..

1. Hall jogging back to position past Thompson gives a short forearm jab to Thompson's bicep - Whistle blows, no bounce up but free kick in the centre to the Roo's.


I saw that one against Hall. The umps continue to think it's all about them. Disgraceful.


that was one of the best decisions of the season - this prevented another situation like what happened when the teams met earlier this season and another baker / s johnson incident


Contact, pass or shot.


so you think wacthing baker vs johnson was good for the game? there is nothing tough about hitting an opponent 100m behind teh play
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby JK » Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:24 pm

MAY-Z wrote:
Drop Bear wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:2 Free kicks Ive seen this weekend that I was just gobsmacked about ..

1. Hall jogging back to position past Thompson gives a short forearm jab to Thompson's bicep - Whistle blows, no bounce up but free kick in the centre to the Roo's.


I saw that one against Hall. The umps continue to think it's all about them. Disgraceful.


that was one of the best decisions of the season - this prevented another situation like what happened when the teams met earlier this season and another baker / s johnson incident


I can appreciate your point mate, but I don't agree with it .. There was nothing further coming from that incident, and even if there was (or something developed later), then by all means be heavy handed with the whistle and notepad if required.

If that penalty was consistently applied (begs the question of why isn't is consistently applied then?) then there would be 20+ free-kicks per game for that sort of thing alone.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37459
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Why oh why?

Postby MAY-Z » Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:29 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:
Drop Bear wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:2 Free kicks Ive seen this weekend that I was just gobsmacked about ..

1. Hall jogging back to position past Thompson gives a short forearm jab to Thompson's bicep - Whistle blows, no bounce up but free kick in the centre to the Roo's.


I saw that one against Hall. The umps continue to think it's all about them. Disgraceful.


that was one of the best decisions of the season - this prevented another situation like what happened when the teams met earlier this season and another baker / s johnson incident


I can appreciate your point mate, but I don't agree with it .. There was nothing further coming from that incident, and even if there was (or something developed later), then by all means be heavy handed with the whistle and notepad if required.

If that penalty was consistently applied (begs the question of why isn't is consistently applied then?) then there would be 20+ free-kicks per game for that sort of thing alone.


all incidents start somewhere - baker only hit johnson once to start with, thompson only hit barry once, the best way to deal with this is to give a free at the start and then pretty soon the players will stop it
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby JK » Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:34 pm

MAY-Z wrote:all incidents start somewhere - baker only hit johnson once to start with, thompson only hit barry once, the best way to deal with this is to give a free at the start and then pretty soon the players will stop it


And not all niggle leads to an "incident" ... Why are players not penalised every time they slap/ bump/knock/niggle an opponent as Hall was?

The Baker/Johnson incidents could have easily been reduced by applying free kick and report if necessary after the first infringement, but I can't see it helping the game if the umps award a free for very little just on the "chance" it could escalate further, how can they ever accurately estimate or judge what will or won't escalate?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37459
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Booney » Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:59 pm

Why is it that when Rioli had a brain snap on Saturday at Footy Park the first thing that the media make metion of is Racial Vilification when there was not a scrap of evidence to suggest this, nor any sort of accusation from Rioli himself. If I were Broadbent and Salter I would be mighty pissed off and would be considering following up those media outlets, for IMO they basically questioned the intentions and actions of Salts and Broady.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61177
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8103 times
Been liked: 11802 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Rik E Boy » Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:07 pm

Why oh why?

1. The proposed introduction of shorter quarters 'driven by the fans' says Anderson.
2. Changing the rules every year. Give it a rest!
3. The expansion. GWS in particular is a joke, Gold Coast might work but GWS never.
4. Tassie being left of the map. If we must expand do it here.
5. Pay TV and FTA showing the same match at the same time.
6. The rule of the week umpiring interpretations. If they aren't directed by a failed Richmond coach why are the doing this?
7. The Eithiad surface. It's crap. Move the games and get your heads out of the Eithad sand.
8. SA vs. Vic. The fans want it. Why isn't it on.
9. NAB Cup. It's crap. Get rid of it.
10. The MRP points system. Complete failure.
11. Too many footy shows. More angles = more controversies and less analysis of the game

GIVE OUR GAME BACK TO US.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28527
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1769 times
Been liked: 1881 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby goraw » Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:37 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:Why oh why?

1. The proposed introduction of shorter quarters 'driven by the fans' says Anderson.
2. Changing the rules every year. Give it a rest!
3. The expansion. GWS in particular is a joke, Gold Coast might work but GWS never.
4. Tassie being left of the map. If we must expand do it here.
5. Pay TV and FTA showing the same match at the same time.
6. The rule of the week umpiring interpretations. If they aren't directed by a failed Richmond coach why are the doing this?
7. The Eithiad surface. It's crap. Move the games and get your heads out of the Eithad sand.
8. SA vs. Vic. The fans want it. Why isn't it on.
9. NAB Cup. It's crap. Get rid of it.
10. The MRP points system. Complete failure.
11. Too many footy shows. More angles = more controversies and less analysis of the game

GIVE OUR GAME BACK TO US.

regards,

REB


best post ive seen all year. agree with every 11 points but particulary points 2,4 and most of all point 8. we have an opportunity to pit most of the best of the best against eachother, and we dont? think its because of injurys to players that teams wont risk ?injurys can happen anytime and i think its stupid its not SA VS VIC every year.
goraw
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:16 am
Location: prospect
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Why oh why?

Postby White Line Fever » Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:43 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:Why oh why?

1. The proposed introduction of shorter quarters 'driven by the fans' says Anderson.
2. Changing the rules every year. Give it a rest!
3. The expansion. GWS in particular is a joke, Gold Coast might work but GWS never.
4. Tassie being left of the map. If we must expand do it here.
5. Pay TV and FTA showing the same match at the same time.
6. The rule of the week umpiring interpretations. If they aren't directed by a failed Richmond coach why are the doing this?
7. The Eithiad surface. It's crap. Move the games and get your heads out of the Eithad sand.
8. SA vs. Vic. The fans want it. Why isn't it on.
9. NAB Cup. It's crap. Get rid of it.
10. The MRP points system. Complete failure.
11. Too many footy shows. More angles = more controversies and less analysis of the game

GIVE OUR GAME BACK TO US.

regards,

REB


Great post
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Why oh why?

Postby CoverKing » Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:53 pm

Booney wrote:Why is it that when Rioli had a brain snap on Saturday at Footy Park the first thing that the media make metion of is Racial Vilification when there was not a scrap of evidence to suggest this, nor any sort of accusation from Rioli himself. If I were Broadbent and Salter I would be mighty pissed off and would be considering following up those media outlets, for IMO they basically questioned the intentions and actions of Salts and Broady.


think u mean Paul Stewart who was on rioli at the time not brogsy!
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Drop Bear » Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:01 pm

MAY-Z wrote:
Drop Bear wrote:
MAY-Z wrote: that was one of the best decisions of the season - this prevented another situation like what happened when the teams met earlier this season and another baker / s johnson incident


Contact, pass or shot.


so you think wacthing baker vs johnson was good for the game? there is nothing tough about hitting an opponent 100m behind teh play


Fair exaggeration comparing Hall's nudge to Baker purposefully targetting Johnson on multiple occasions. And that incident is just one in a game which is continually being made into a non contact endurance sport.
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Why oh why?

Postby Drop Bear » Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:02 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:Why oh why?

1. The proposed introduction of shorter quarters 'driven by the fans' says Anderson.
2. Changing the rules every year. Give it a rest!3. The expansion. GWS in particular is a joke, Gold Coast might work but GWS never.
4. Tassie being left of the map. If we must expand do it here.
5. Pay TV and FTA showing the same match at the same time.
6. The rule of the week umpiring interpretations. If they aren't directed by a failed Richmond coach why are the doing this?7. The Eithiad surface. It's crap. Move the games and get your heads out of the Eithad sand.
8. SA vs. Vic. The fans want it. Why isn't it on.
9. NAB Cup. It's crap. Get rid of it.
10. The MRP points system. Complete failure.
11. Too many footy shows. More angles = more controversies and less analysis of the game

GIVE OUR GAME BACK TO US.
regards,

REB


Well said.
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Why oh why?

Postby saintal » Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:22 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:Why oh why?

1. The proposed introduction of shorter quarters 'driven by the fans' says Anderson.
2. Changing the rules every year. Give it a rest!
3. The expansion. GWS in particular is a joke, Gold Coast might work but GWS never.
4. Tassie being left of the map. If we must expand do it here.
5. Pay TV and FTA showing the same match at the same time.
6. The rule of the week umpiring interpretations. If they aren't directed by a failed Richmond coach why are the doing this?
7. The Eithiad surface. It's crap. Move the games and get your heads out of the Eithad sand.
8. SA vs. Vic. The fans want it. Why isn't it on.
9. NAB Cup. It's crap. Get rid of it.
10. The MRP points system. Complete failure.
11. Too many footy shows. More angles = more controversies and less analysis of the game

GIVE OUR GAME BACK TO US.

regards,

REB


Spot on with those REB. On #10, C. Rioli only copping two weeks, in light of some of the other decisions this season (Baker, Cotchin, Motlop even..) is bewildering.

#11- According to the AFLPA, in 2009 there were 760 accredited journalists covering the AFL. Seems a little over the top doesn't it?

And on #5, give us back live footy on EVERY sunday arvo, not a 3pm reply.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
saintal
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5794
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has liked: 367 times
Been liked: 455 times

Next

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |