by FlyingHigh » Sun May 23, 2010 10:17 am
Last week was meant to be "Umpires Appreciation Round".
Fair enough, some people seem to go to the footy to just criticise the umpires, and the umpires deserve more respect than this.
BUT, if the AFL want us to respect the umpires, why don't those that run the game put in place rules that the footy supporters want to see and instinctively know how the game should be played.
The rules committee is just there for its own importance. How many of the rule changes going back to the mid-90's when they changed the time-off for out of bounds, have actually enhanced the game? Compare this to cricket, where there have probably been three major rule changes over the past 40 years, one to the games benefit, one so-so, and one rescinded as soon as they realised the mistake. Otherwise, despite the bagging some ex-players give them, the cricket administrators seem to let the game evolve as a game by itself.
This week will be all about Barry Hall. Sure, the headlock wasn't good. But compare the instances where players get right into his face (Mitchell in that 3 50's in a row last year, four Collingwood players going at him when the ball is no where near him in Round 1, several North Melbourne players lining up at him as he was dragged yesterday). In these instances, the players have no reason to go near him and aren't "in the contest" and he's meant to put up with that crap, yet if you're "not in the contest" and instinctively lightly grab a players guernsey after he marks, it's fifty metre penalty.
So, i agree, the AFL can get stuffed, but I don't solely blame the umpires.