by sydney-dog » Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:20 pm
Blue Boy
As I said in the previous thread... your question
Why have the Crows used there top pick on someone who will not play league football next year.
why do you take such a narrow view ??
It's not just about next season, it's about the next 10 season, I honestly believe Dangerfield has more to offer the AFC and the modern game than Ebert..
Ebert will become a solid AFL player, however, he will always have a strong lure to return to the Power, he said this in an interview earlier in the year....
Dangerfield, has the courage and discipline to play as a defensive or inside midfielder or as a defender, he also has blistering speed to play as an outside midfielder, most importantly his stoppage and clearance work is Judd like, most importantly he takes the game on, he runs the lines and carries the ball and is very strong over head
The Geelong Falcon's have a fantastic football development program, and a reputation at producing Elite players "Judd", Dangerfield won their Best Player in 2007
The safe decision was to take Ebert, the AFC has shown some courage in drafting Dangerfield, I have no doubt, Dangerfield will reward the club and supporters, IMO, this kid is a Gun and a better footballer than Ebert, lets remember the AFC were not the only club to pass on Ebert.....
Most importantly, 8 seasons ago the crows passed on the big Pav, reason was, as a 17 year Pav decisded he would not play the following season, now the club is still paying for that decision....
the AFC is not the first club to recruit a 17 year old high in the draft, and not to have him available the following year due to schooling.....
As a member of the AFC, I am happy with today's draft, I was hoping for speed and players that offer flexibility, Dangerfield, Cook, Otten and Jacky offer these qualities and much more
Well done AFC for not playing safe with Pick 10