SA Footy

Dutchy wrote:So Port fans, with Charlie out of contract and will be 30 next year, what term would you be prepared to offer him? Bit of tricky one I would think

2 would be the safe option but would be comfortable with 3. You keen to finally open that war chest?

LMA wrote:

Dutchy wrote:So Port fans, with Charlie out of contract and will be 30 next year, what term would you be prepared to offer him? Bit of tricky one I would think

2 would be the safe option but would be comfortable with 3. You keen to finally open that war chest?

He’s battered and bruised.
You won’t get 3 more years out of him.

amber_fluid wrote:

LMA wrote:

Dutchy wrote:So Port fans, with Charlie out of contract and will be 30 next year, what term would you be prepared to offer him? Bit of tricky one I would think

2 would be the safe option but would be comfortable with 3. You keen to finally open that war chest?

He’s battered and bruised.
You won’t get 3 more years out of him.

Yeah, with his style I reckon he drops off pretty quickly. Maybe 2 with an option for a third incentive based?
Wouldn’t be offering 3 straight out and Port hold the upper hand IMO

Dutchy wrote:So Port fans, with Charlie out of contract and will be 30 next year, what term would you be prepared to offer him? Bit of tricky one I would think

Media throwing it out there this morning that he is being chased by one of the Brisbane Clubs

locky801 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:So Port fans, with Charlie out of contract and will be 30 next year, what term would you be prepared to offer him? Bit of tricky one I would think

Media throwing it out there this morning that he is being chased by one of the Brisbane Clubs

How many Brisbane clubs are there?

Roo stirring the pot saying Brisbane offering 4 years

LMA wrote:

Dutchy wrote:So Port fans, with Charlie out of contract and will be 30 next year, what term would you be prepared to offer him? Bit of tricky one I would think

2 would be the safe option but would be comfortable with 3. You keen to finally open that war chest?

Yeah that's were its going to get tricky, Id say Port would be prepared for 2 years, but Charlie would want 3.

I would think he would be a perfect fit at Collingwood.

I think Port will give him 3yrs, but i'd suspect his 3rd would be worth significantly less.

He may end up opting for 2yrs.

MW wrote:Roo stirring the pot saying Brisbane offering 4 years

Like that meat head could count to 4.

Booney wrote:

MW wrote:Roo stirring the pot saying Brisbane offering 4 years

Like that meat head could count to 4.

Yep, Dixon couldn’t count past two

Booney wrote:

MW wrote:Roo stirring the pot saying Brisbane offering 4 years

Like that meat head could count to 4.

I think he's counted past that with his pub ownerships

Brodlach wrote:

Booney wrote:

MW wrote:Roo stirring the pot saying Brisbane offering 4 years

Like that meat head could count to 4.

Yep, Dixon couldn’t count past two

Well we all know he can't count to 30 after that effort at Geelong a few years back.

MW wrote:

Booney wrote:

MW wrote:Roo stirring the pot saying Brisbane offering 4 years

Like that meat head could count to 4.

I think he's counted past that with his pub ownerships

And 1 club he's ruined.

Sorry daisy, no review this week pal. Got really drunk Saturday away with the mates, don't recall much other than Hawthorn being ugly to watch and Boak being best on. Sorry to disappoint, I know how much you love reading them.

F*** me, I got stuck watching footy classified last night and how the hell do they make such a crap show?? All 4 are plain dopey although 3 of them make Kane look intelligent.

Hutcho: Thinks there's a spot at Port for Walker to resurrect his career..............................And the word "Lordo", WTF, how do you get that out of Lloyd? It kills me on the Sunday show too.
Caro: Just loves to dig at Eddie/Collingwood and thinks whatever she says is correct and the rest of the panel have no idea.
Lloyd: He makes my ears bleed, loved him as a player but the buck stops there.
Kane: They all go to him for back-up.

No shit, I was looking forward to the adverts.

Booney wrote:Sorry daisy, no review this week pal. Got really drunk Saturday away with the mates, don't recall much other than Hawthorn being ugly to watch and Boak being best on. Sorry to disappoint, I know how much you love reading them.

The Oracle is human after all

Dutchy wrote:So Port fans, with Charlie out of contract and will be 30 next year, what term would you be prepared to offer him? Bit of tricky one I would think

Not tricky, career best year turning 30, fit as he's ever been, you get a 2 year deal with an option for a third.

Lightning McQueen wrote:F*** me, I got stuck watching footy classified last night and how the hell do they make such a crap show?? All 4 are plain dopey although 3 of them make Kane look intelligent.

Hutcho: Thinks there's a spot at Port for Walker to resurrect his career..............................And the word "Lordo", WTF, how do you get that out of Lloyd? It kills me on the Sunday show too.
Caro: Just loves to dig at Eddie/Collingwood and thinks whatever she says is correct and the rest of the panel have no idea.
Lloyd: He makes my ears bleed, loved him as a player but the buck stops there.
Kane: They all go to him for back-up.

No shit, I was looking forward to the adverts.

Hutchy's zinger about getting Tasmania into the comp this year trumps his Walker to Port call. Get off the cookies Hutch.

LMA wrote:

Booney wrote:Sorry daisy, no review this week pal. Got really drunk Saturday away with the mates, don't recall much other than Hawthorn being ugly to watch and Boak being best on. Sorry to disappoint, I know how much you love reading them.

The Oracle is human after all

I wasn't even 1% human on Sunday morning.

Port are after Jeremy Cameron I’m hearing.