Dutchy wrote:Kane said there were 5 players who weren't AFL standard last week, so who are they?
Narkle, F Evans, McEntee, DBJ ?
Granted I was at the pub and didn’t scrutinize, but I thought DBJ was alright tonight?
by JK » Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:32 am
Dutchy wrote:Kane said there were 5 players who weren't AFL standard last week, so who are they?
Narkle, F Evans, McEntee, DBJ ?
by helicopterking » Sat Sep 21, 2024 4:00 am
Armchair expert wrote:Dutchy wrote:Kane said there were 5 players who weren't AFL standard last week, so who are they?
Narkle, F Evans, McEntee, DBJ ?
Jones just fumbles all the time
by Dutchy » Sat Sep 21, 2024 11:29 pm
JK wrote:Dutchy wrote:Kane said there were 5 players who weren't AFL standard last week, so who are they?
Narkle, F Evans, McEntee, DBJ ?
Granted I was at the pub and didn’t scrutinize, but I thought DBJ was alright tonight?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Sep 22, 2024 2:33 pm
Dutchy wrote:JK wrote:Dutchy wrote:Kane said there were 5 players who weren't AFL standard last week, so who are they?
Narkle, F Evans, McEntee, DBJ ?
Granted I was at the pub and didn’t scrutinize, but I thought DBJ was alright tonight?
Talking about the week before JK
by Booney » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:31 pm
helicopterking wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Dutchy wrote:Kane said there were 5 players who weren't AFL standard last week, so who are they?
Narkle, F Evans, McEntee, DBJ ?
Jones just fumbles all the time
Zerk Thatcher isn’t very good
by helicopterking » Sun Sep 22, 2024 5:42 pm
Booney wrote:helicopterking wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Dutchy wrote:Kane said there were 5 players who weren't AFL standard last week, so who are they?
Narkle, F Evans, McEntee, DBJ ?
Jones just fumbles all the time
Zerk Thatcher isn’t very good
So many ordinary players in a team that finished top 4. So many.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:31 am
helicopterking wrote:
Zerk Thatcher isn’t very good
by Booney » Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:56 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:helicopterking wrote:
Zerk Thatcher isn’t very good
I thought he improved considerably over the year.
by Jim05 » Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:50 am
He does his job most weeks with a minimum of fuss but he still has days where he just looks like a space cadet out there but that’s what you will get with him. Thought he had a pretty solid seasonLightning McQueen wrote:helicopterking wrote:
Zerk Thatcher isn’t very good
I thought he improved considerably over the year.
by woodublieve12 » Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:54 am
Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:helicopterking wrote:
Zerk Thatcher isn’t very good
I thought he improved considerably over the year.
Saying he's not very good just means you haven't watched enough of Port play this year which is fair enough if you're not a Port fan. He, like Ratugolea, looked out of sorts when there were three talls in defence and it's no coincidence Port's fortunes particularly defensively improved when it went to Aliir and BZK back there. Zerk-Thatcher proved his worth.
by amber_fluid » Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:58 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:helicopterking wrote:
Zerk Thatcher isn’t very good
I thought he improved considerably over the year.
Saying he's not very good just means you haven't watched enough of Port play this year which is fair enough if you're not a Port fan. He, like Ratugolea, looked out of sorts when there were three talls in defence and it's no coincidence Port's fortunes particularly defensively improved when it went to Aliir and BZK back there. Zerk-Thatcher proved his worth.
Ratugolea, i feel is being unfairly criticised regarding the prelim. The bloke had no chance. Up against not only multiple swans defenders but he was also competing with his own players. Would have been a horrible night to be a forward for port with the delivery they had.
by Booney » Mon Sep 23, 2024 10:06 am
woodublieve12 wrote:
Ratugolea, i feel is being unfairly criticised regarding the prelim. The bloke had no chance. Up against not only multiple swans defenders but he was also competing with his own players. Would have been a horrible night to be a forward for port with the delivery they had.
by The Bedge » Mon Sep 23, 2024 10:16 am
Booney wrote:Poor movement from the back half, midfield under pressure, forward entries back to our long bomb plan and Ratugolea and Dixon competing with 4 Sydney defenders every time in came back down to earth. Neither of them stood a chance.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by tigerpie » Mon Sep 23, 2024 10:27 am
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:Poor movement from the back half, midfield under pressure, forward entries back to our long bomb plan and Ratugolea and Dixon competing with 4 Sydney defenders every time in came back down to earth. Neither of them stood a chance.
Not right to blame outs, but is anyone actually surprised by that?
Farrell, Houston massive outs in terms of ball use and movement - both can break lines by foot and with precision. Marshall I struggle with each year, but he's a good connect higher up the ground - moves well, leads up, uses the ball well.
McKenzie, SPP, Finlyason also others who if weren't injured would've been in the mix.
I actually would've gambled with Burton as the key forward replacing Marshall. and left Burgoyne at half back.
Don't mind that Lorenz either just quietly, and i'm still scratching my head over Evans being the sub - am I the only one who thinks he's bloody handy? Surely ahead of Narkle?
by Booney » Mon Sep 23, 2024 10:30 am
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:Poor movement from the back half, midfield under pressure, forward entries back to our long bomb plan and Ratugolea and Dixon competing with 4 Sydney defenders every time in came back down to earth. Neither of them stood a chance.
Not right to blame outs, but is anyone actually surprised by that?
Farrell, Houston massive outs in terms of ball use and movement - both can break lines by foot and with precision. Marshall I struggle with each year, but he's a good connect higher up the ground - moves well, leads up, uses the ball well.
McKenzie, SPP, Finlyason also others who if weren't injured would've been in the mix.
I actually would've gambled with Burton as the key forward replacing Marshall. and left Burgoyne at half back.
Don't mind that Lorenz either just quietly, and i'm still scratching my head over Evans being the sub - am I the only one who thinks he's bloody handy? Surely ahead of Narkle?
by Booney » Mon Sep 23, 2024 10:33 am
tigerpie wrote:Your Burton call was the same as mine.
Leave Burgoyne at half back delivering it and Burton complimented Gorgiadis as lead up forward with pace.
I actually felt sorry for Charlie, he struggled to get up off the ground.
Port would be hoping Houston stays and chase forwards at the trade table.
by tigerpie » Mon Sep 23, 2024 1:15 pm
Booney wrote:tigerpie wrote:Your Burton call was the same as mine.
Leave Burgoyne at half back delivering it and Burton complimented Gorgiadis as lead up forward with pace.
I actually felt sorry for Charlie, he struggled to get up off the ground.
Port would be hoping Houston stays and chase forwards at the trade table.
We don't need them, we need the ones on the list fit.
Georgiades, Lord and Finlayson are a much better mix than what we saw in Friday night. Marshall in some doubt with his head knocks and a young Scully ( not coming along as I'd have liked ) in the SANFL. Scully may get cut to make room for another forward, Lukosius may be the one. Add Powell-Pepper back in and Narkle / Evans are out and it's a vastly improved front half.
If Narkle, Evans and Marshall are in the SANFL we've then got some back ups.
by Brodlach » Tue Sep 24, 2024 7:14 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by locky801 » Wed Sep 25, 2024 6:20 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Sep 26, 2024 8:42 am
locky801 wrote:Charlie has also announced his retirement
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |