by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:53 pm
by Brodlach » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:11 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:16 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:I can only find black rectangles covering good bits, my friend is going to be annoyed with me.
by Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:20 pm
by Magellan » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:28 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:I can only find black rectangles covering good bits
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:44 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I can only find black rectangles covering good bits, my friend is going to be annoyed with me.
Are you, kind of, wondering what's the point?
by bennymacca » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:45 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Very silly this young lady would pose for such a photo.
Very, very silly the player would share it around.
by MW » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:48 pm
bennymacca wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Very silly this young lady would pose for such a photo.
Very, very silly the player would share it around.
I’m struggling to see why it’s a big deal.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:49 pm
bennymacca wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Very silly this young lady would pose for such a photo.
Very, very silly the player would share it around.
I’m struggling to see why it’s a big deal.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:49 pm
MW wrote:bennymacca wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Very silly this young lady would pose for such a photo.
Very, very silly the player would share it around.
I’m struggling to see why it’s a big deal.
Seriously? distributed without her consent is not a big deal?
by MW » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:51 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:54 pm
MW wrote:That's the alleged case yes.
Apparently it was taken by the player, and requested to be deleted after which he apparently told her it was deleted.
Stupid and naïve of the girl to not check, and to pose like that in the first place TBH
by bennymacca » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:56 pm
MW wrote:That's the alleged case yes.
Apparently it was taken by the player, and requested to be deleted after which he apparently told her it was deleted.
Stupid and naïve of the girl to not check, and to pose like that in the first place TBH
by Magellan » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:58 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I can only find black rectangles covering good bits, my friend is going to be annoyed with me.
Are you, kind of, wondering what's the point?
Not sure, quite titillating.
by bennymacca » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:00 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:bennymacca wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Very silly this young lady would pose for such a photo.
Very, very silly the player would share it around.
I’m struggling to see why it’s a big deal.
Yeah, really, it's not as though she was violated or anything, it seems in good taste.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:06 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:14 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:44 pm
by morell » Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:49 pm
by carey » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:13 pm
morell wrote:Yeah that's a crime. No sympathy for whoever distributed it. Ought to face the full force of the law.
This shit has to stop.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |