by jakovasaurus » Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:16 am
by jakovasaurus » Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:17 am
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:20 am
by cracka » Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:45 am
by MW » Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:48 am
by cracka » Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:51 am
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:03 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:bennymacca wrote:If you look at overseas comps it is pretty normal for players to announce they will be playing somewhere else next year.
Tbh i think it is just one of those things that will come with increased professionalism of the game, and with free agency. Players move around more, club loyalty becomes a rarity rather than the norm. It is only beginning to happen in the AFL but i think we will see it soon enough.
Being open and honest about it seems much better than secretly signing halfway through a season
I'd sooner go out to battle with those who I think have plans of sticking around for the next season, it would be left second guessing their efforts at times if I knew their intentions were to leave our group.
Just my take on it.
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:06 am
MW wrote:Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
by carey » Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:20 am
bennymacca wrote:MW wrote:Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
Danger is a restricted free agent, so can the crows choose to match Geelongs offer then trade him!
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:27 am
by MW » Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:36 am
bennymacca wrote:MW wrote:Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
Danger is a restricted free agent, so can the crows choose to match Geelongs offer then trade him!
by JK » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:02 am
carey wrote:bennymacca wrote:MW wrote:Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
Danger is a restricted free agent, so can the crows choose to match Geelongs offer then trade him!
Crows have no chance of matching the offer. Not enough salary cap room to match that offer.
by Jim05 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:10 am
MW wrote:Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
by Q. » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:16 am
Jim05 wrote:Im still not sure its down to 2 only.
Collingwood are rumoured to have a 1.4m x 5 year deal being worked on and the Hawks have quite a bit of room to manouvre with a big back ended contract, wouldnt be surprised if he ends up at either
by stan » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:17 am
Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
Im still not sure its down to 2 only.
Collingwood are rumoured to have a 1.4m x 5 year deal being worked on and the Hawks have quite a bit of room to manouvre with a big back ended contract, wouldnt be surprised if he ends up at either
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:22 am
Q. wrote:Jim05 wrote:Im still not sure its down to 2 only.
Collingwood are rumoured to have a 1.4m x 5 year deal being worked on and the Hawks have quite a bit of room to manouvre with a big back ended contract, wouldnt be surprised if he ends up at either
With Paddy, Tay Adams and Swanny running through the mids, we may struggle to hit the side of a barn with our kicks
by Fricky » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:26 am
stan wrote:Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
Im still not sure its down to 2 only.
Collingwood are rumoured to have a 1.4m x 5 year deal being worked on and the Hawks have quite a bit of room to manouvre with a big back ended contract, wouldnt be surprised if he ends up at either
The Hawks have been very quiet on this but I still think they are in with a chance.
by stan » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:30 am
Suri wrote:stan wrote:Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
Im still not sure its down to 2 only.
Collingwood are rumoured to have a 1.4m x 5 year deal being worked on and the Hawks have quite a bit of room to manouvre with a big back ended contract, wouldnt be surprised if he ends up at either
The Hawks have been very quiet on this but I still think they are in with a chance.
I've always considered Hawthorn and Collingwood as the front runners for Danger's signature if he doesn't sign on at the Crows. Both in great spots for tilts at the flag in the coming years and could both over him a nice pay packet.
Danger out, Aish in?
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:37 am
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:38 am
stan wrote:Suri wrote:stan wrote:Jim05 wrote:[quote="MW"]Why would Geelong deal for him when they get him for free? His manager has already said it's between Adelaide and Geelong. Adelaide have no bargaining power. The only way the Crows might get a trade from Geelong is if Danger cannot accept leaving Adelaide for nothing and requests a trade otherwise he will stay at Adelaide, which is highly unlikely.
Im still not sure its down to 2 only.
Collingwood are rumoured to have a 1.4m x 5 year deal being worked on and the Hawks have quite a bit of room to manouvre with a big back ended contract, wouldnt be surprised if he ends up at either
The Hawks have been very quiet on this but I still think they are in with a chance.
I've always considered Hawthorn and Collingwood as the front runners for Danger's signature if he doesn't sign on at the Crows. Both in great spots for tilts at the flag in the coming years and could both over him a nice pay packet.
Danger out, Aish in?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |