by Brodlach » Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:05 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by amber_fluid » Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:49 pm
Brodlach wrote:Have no issue with Dixon getting 5 years, had to offer them some sort of carrot to get him to move
by Brodlach » Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:13 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Brodlach wrote:Have no issue with Dixon getting 5 years, had to offer them some sort of carrot to get him to move
Time will tell but he was worth the risk...... I'll give Port that one.
One out of four ain't bad!!
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by JK » Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:14 pm
Brodlach wrote:I am no fan at all of Troy Menzel, I think we (the Crows) are in trouble if he plays but I would even take him before Polec. Polec's best games came when Hinkley bought in the run game style but as soon as teams worked that plan out Polec has become null and void.
Not trolling just having a footy discussion
by Ruben Carter » Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:18 pm
Brodlach wrote:Have no issue with Dixon getting 5 years, had to offer them some sort of carrot to get him to move
by Brodlach » Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:23 pm
Ruben Carter wrote:Brodlach wrote:Have no issue with Dixon getting 5 years, had to offer them some sort of carrot to get him to move
Me either. He's not Buddy, but he'll be the no.1 tall forward in SA by the end of this season, I reckon.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by valleys07 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:24 pm
Ruben Carter wrote:Brodlach wrote:Have no issue with Dixon getting 5 years, had to offer them some sort of carrot to get him to move
Me either. He's not Buddy, but he'll be the no.1 tall forward in SA by the end of this season, I reckon.
by Ruben Carter » Thu Mar 16, 2017 8:21 pm
valleys07 wrote:Ruben Carter wrote:Brodlach wrote:Have no issue with Dixon getting 5 years, had to offer them some sort of carrot to get him to move
Me either. He's not Buddy, but he'll be the no.1 tall forward in SA by the end of this season, I reckon.
Christ! There's optimism, then lunacy, then Ruben
He has 1 tall to overtake before he is the #1 forward on Port's list. Then we can work on Adelaide's
by Dutchy » Thu Mar 16, 2017 10:25 pm
Brodlach wrote:Have no issue with Dixon getting 5 years, had to offer them some sort of carrot to get him to move
by Ruben Carter » Fri Mar 17, 2017 7:53 am
Dutchy wrote:Brodlach wrote:Have no issue with Dixon getting 5 years, had to offer them some sort of carrot to get him to move
Averages 13 games a year and was injured again this pre-season....
by GWW » Fri Mar 17, 2017 7:57 am
by stan » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:57 am
GWW wrote:Dixon was a risk Port had to take, because the club's drafting & development of key forwards - eg Harvey & Shaw - has been diabolical.
by Dutchy » Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:06 am
GWW wrote:Dixon was a risk Port had to take, because the club's drafting & development of key forwards - eg Harvey & Shaw - has been diabolical.
by MW » Fri Mar 17, 2017 12:20 pm
by the milky bar kid » Fri Mar 17, 2017 12:37 pm
MW wrote:Kochie just can't stop can he...
by GWW » Fri Mar 17, 2017 12:55 pm
stan wrote:GWW wrote:Dixon was a risk Port had to take, because the club's drafting & development of key forwards - eg Harvey & Shaw - has been diabolical.
What Butcher doesnt get a mention?
by DOC » Fri Mar 17, 2017 1:07 pm
GWW wrote:stan wrote:GWW wrote:Dixon was a risk Port had to take, because the club's drafting & development of key forwards - eg Harvey & Shaw - has been diabolical.
What Butcher doesnt get a mention?
Fair point - yeah, he belongs in the group too.
by am Bays » Fri Mar 17, 2017 1:20 pm
DOC wrote:GWW wrote:stan wrote:GWW wrote:Dixon was a risk Port had to take, because the club's drafting & development of key forwards - eg Harvey & Shaw - has been diabolical.
What Butcher doesnt get a mention?
Fair point - yeah, he belongs in the group too.
If they had been at different (SANFL) clubs (ie the old system), would they have developed better?
by Booney » Fri Mar 17, 2017 1:33 pm
by amber_fluid » Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:20 pm
GWW wrote:stan wrote:GWW wrote:Dixon was a risk Port had to take, because the club's drafting & development of key forwards - eg Harvey & Shaw - has been diabolical.
What Butcher doesnt get a mention?
Fair point - yeah, he belongs in the group too.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |