by bennymacca » Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:39 pm
cracka wrote:They only did a top 8 in the herald sun.
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:41 pm
cracka wrote:So 6/10 experts from the most crows bias paper (according to user from this forum) said they'd make the 8. Well that's it then compelling evidence. When I get the chance I'll check the herald sun.
by cracka » Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:47 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:cracka wrote:So 6/10 experts from the most crows bias paper (according to user from this forum) said they'd make the 8. Well that's it then compelling evidence. When I get the chance I'll check the herald sun.
The Advertiser is definately a very Crows bias paper. I remember the Power beating the Crows in the showdown last year and the Advertiser was littered with articles about how the Crows lost and about their finals hopes etc and still being alive.. very little attention given to the Power on their win
by Sheik Yerbouti » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:21 pm
Hefty wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:Don't really agree with crows bias in the tiser - their chief football writer is a huge port man.
Contrary to what idiots like jim think I haven't seen anyone rate the crows that highly. Bottom half of the eight if we play well has always been the best case scenario
Jenkins played really well today, forward line looked much better with him giving a contest and betts and pods also looked dangerous
Eddie Betts manager is truly a genius. He must be the only AFL footballer with a clause in his contract that states "At no time shall it be expected Betts place his head over the ball in the event of an opposition player being within 10 metres"
Kane Cornes says Hi....
by Chuck Wepner » Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:40 pm
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:Hefty wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:Don't really agree with crows bias in the tiser - their chief football writer is a huge port man.
Contrary to what idiots like jim think I haven't seen anyone rate the crows that highly. Bottom half of the eight if we play well has always been the best case scenario
Jenkins played really well today, forward line looked much better with him giving a contest and betts and pods also looked dangerous
Eddie Betts manager is truly a genius. He must be the only AFL footballer with a clause in his contract that states "At no time shall it be expected Betts place his head over the ball in the event of an opposition player being within 10 metres"
Kane Cornes says Hi....
Chee Cockatoo Collins jumps up & down waving madly.
by Lethal Dose » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:31 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:cracka wrote:So 6/10 experts from the most crows bias paper (according to user from this forum) said they'd make the 8. Well that's it then compelling evidence. When I get the chance I'll check the herald sun.
The Advertiser is definately a very Crows bias paper. I remember the Power beating the Crows in the showdown last year and the Advertiser was littered with articles about how the Crows lost and about their finals hopes etc and still being alive.. very little attention given to the Power on their win
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:09 am
Lethal Dose wrote:Kidding aren't you, Rucci is the biggest port supporter going around, and he writes like it too, biased. Tredrea and Riccutio are they only ones i like to read
by stan » Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:45 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Lethal Dose wrote:Kidding aren't you, Rucci is the biggest port supporter going around, and he writes like it too, biased. Tredrea and Riccutio are they only ones i like to read
Rucci is just an out and out knob
by woodublieve12 » Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:56 am
Lethal Dose wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:cracka wrote:So 6/10 experts from the most crows bias paper (according to user from this forum) said they'd make the 8. Well that's it then compelling evidence. When I get the chance I'll check the herald sun.
The Advertiser is definately a very Crows bias paper. I remember the Power beating the Crows in the showdown last year and the Advertiser was littered with articles about how the Crows lost and about their finals hopes etc and still being alive.. very little attention given to the Power on their win
Kidding aren't you, Rucci is the biggest port supporter going around, and he writes like it too, biased. Tredrea and Riccutio are they only ones i like to read
by bennymacca » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:13 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:20 am
bennymacca wrote:yes but as opposed to what. the power? or the rest of the AFL? you can understand the second one given it is an adelaide paper, and the first one im not sure i agree with, but there is a fair chance i am biased in that regards.
by Footy Smart » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:22 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:bennymacca wrote:yes but as opposed to what. the power? or the rest of the AFL? you can understand the second one given it is an adelaide paper, and the first one im not sure i agree with, but there is a fair chance i am biased in that regards.
How about just reporting the truth instead of trying to put a positive spin on everything and make the Crows seem like an almighty powerhouse when they are struggling
by bennymacca » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:29 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:bennymacca wrote:yes but as opposed to what. the power? or the rest of the AFL? you can understand the second one given it is an adelaide paper, and the first one im not sure i agree with, but there is a fair chance i am biased in that regards.
How about just reporting the truth instead of trying to put a positive spin on everything and make the Crows seem like an almighty powerhouse when they are struggling
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:30 am
Footy Smart wrote:cmon PG your a glass half full kind of guy arent ya?
I think the paper is 2 articles each today - but hey, who's counting
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:32 am
bennymacca wrote:because as a paper, they are trying to sell papers, not sell the truth.
so if they continually rubbished both teams when they were doing crap nobody would buy the paper. as this forum shows, people like to whinge about anything, but they whinge much more about bad coverage, even if it is true.
by Footy Smart » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:35 am
I haven't read the paper today, but i'll do my best to find more than two
by bennymacca » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:48 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:bennymacca wrote:because as a paper, they are trying to sell papers, not sell the truth.
so if they continually rubbished both teams when they were doing crap nobody would buy the paper. as this forum shows, people like to whinge about anything, but they whinge much more about bad coverage, even if it is true.
Got to be a healthy balance, i know plenty that dont buy the paper now because it's a waste of money so may as well print something insightful and accurate
by cracka » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:03 am
stan wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Lethal Dose wrote:Kidding aren't you, Rucci is the biggest port supporter going around, and he writes like it too, biased. Tredrea and Riccutio are they only ones i like to read
Rucci is just an out and out knob
Pretty sure Rucci hates everyone. Hes one of those bring down journo's that need bad news to make a story.
by woodublieve12 » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:29 am
bennymacca wrote:yes but as opposed to what. the power? or the rest of the AFL? you can understand the second one given it is an adelaide paper, and the first one im not sure i agree with, but there is a fair chance i am biased in that regards.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |