NO-MERCY wrote:Who was runner up last year?
Mitchell or Cotchin I believe?
by valleys07 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 6:53 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Who was runner up last year?
by kickinit » Tue Jun 25, 2013 7:05 pm
pafc1870 wrote:They said on the news this morning on 7 that the drug he took was banned when he took it, and banned world wide, so he should have known. Even if the club said it was ok, the player is responsible for what's in his body
by cripple » Tue Jun 25, 2013 8:50 pm
by kickinit » Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:31 pm
cripple wrote:Should make watson play for the demons for 2 years as punishment.
by Jim05 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:45 pm
Johno6 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Jobe was one of the handfull of players who didnt take part in the supplement program, he has no case to answer with ASADA
ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS STATEMENT.
by daysofourlives » Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:54 am
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:43 am
by GWW » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:00 am
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:08 am
GWW wrote:There's been some recent talk in the media - perhaps not credible - that he will have to hand in the Brownlow.
So I wonder if second place would get it (anyone know who came 2nd?).
by Brodlach » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:11 am
woodublieve12 wrote:GWW wrote:There's been some recent talk in the media - perhaps not credible - that he will have to hand in the Brownlow.
So I wonder if second place would get it (anyone know who came 2nd?).
wasn't it cotchin???
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Banker » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:24 am
Brodlach wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:GWW wrote:There's been some recent talk in the media - perhaps not credible - that he will have to hand in the Brownlow.
So I wonder if second place would get it (anyone know who came 2nd?).
wasn't it cotchin???
Mentioned on 5AA it was Cotchin and Mitchell tied for second. I think Mitchell was not able to win due to suspension?
by Booney » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:41 am
by smac » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:58 am
Booney wrote:If the ban is 2 years and (potentially) Essendon has had 30+ players take the banned drug. ASADA rub them out* for two years, what of Essendon/AFL TV rights? etc etc
I simply cant wait for this to all come out....
by Booney » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:28 am
smac wrote:Booney wrote:If the ban is 2 years and (potentially) Essendon has had 30+ players take the banned drug. ASADA rub them out* for two years, what of Essendon/AFL TV rights? etc etc
I simply cant wait for this to all come out....
Whilst getting offended at those cackling at Port's possible demise? Nice set of double standards you've got there.
by smac » Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:04 pm
by Booney » Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:22 pm
smac wrote:Sorry, thoughtmeant you were laughing. Not sure what made me think that.
by Killa » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:35 pm
by NO-MERCY » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:29 pm
Killa wrote:Expect a team penalty due to multiple players involved.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |