Booney wrote:mots02 wrote:Booney wrote:I can only think this is why Davies has called for the AFL to educate all within the industry further on these matters.
The "Walk a mile in their shoes" comes to mind here, we can think or feel what we want but ultimately it's the person taking the comments to heart who needs to educate us on why it's taken that way, to help us understand why.
Feels like this is just the beginning of something far greater.
Thanks CD

This place really has a finite timeline on mature conversations.
Hardly.
No offence, but you’re a white anglo-saxon who, on the balance of probabilities and by your own admission, has not suffered personally from racism.
I, as someone of southern European descent, have been racially vilified for much of my life … not only by those ugly southern European sledges, but also, ironically, indigenous vilification as well due to my skin complexion.

I’ve walked in the shoes that you have stated that you, in your own words, say that you haven't.
Rioli has been afforded more opportunities than arguably he hasn't deserved to still be in the AFL system. Everyone is different, but as a few have already mentioned, if he has been racially vilified on field then why hasn’t this been reported if it (understandably) affects him so much?
No doubt it's been difficult for him on occasions, but he has some problems that he, and the club, seem to be avoiding by casting him as a victim which apparently justifies his poor actions.
As I’ve previous stated, at Glenelg he was a shy, modest and impressive young man … this has seemingly changed since becoming an AFL footballer.
A mature and robust discussion takes in all angles, not just a narrative to avoid taking responsibility.
No opinion is right or wrong. Whether you, I or others agree or disagree is actually irrelevant.
Play on.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.