SA Footy

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

Spargo wrote:Free kicks 30-14
Including an advantage which was clearly taken in front of goal, subsequently missed, but called back by the umpire.
Then the no score review which was blatantly touched.
It was like watching West Coast in Perth.

It was disgraceful, but nobody will care because it's only GWS

No one usually cares if the umpiring is bad against nsw teams

woodublieve12 wrote:

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

Spargo wrote:Free kicks 30-14
Including an advantage which was clearly taken in front of goal, subsequently missed, but called back by the umpire.
Then the no score review which was blatantly touched.
It was like watching West Coast in Perth.

It was disgraceful, but nobody will care because it's only GWS

No one usually cares if the umpiring is bad against nsw teams

One person is guaranteed to care
#2016 #robbed #tainted #letitgobigfella

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

MW wrote:

mighty hounds wrote:How was that Mckernen goal not reviewed? GWS defenders pinky finger clearly flicks back. Use it or piss it off

All goals are reviewed

They are reviewed by junior AFL staff who get paid $250 per game. I don't think they know what they are doing. Either get the right people using the technology or get rid of it.

All reviews should be done by this site. Not one bad call in living memory is a track record second to none.

******* wanker goal reviewers killing my multi before it even gets started.

Booney wrote:******* wanker goal reviewers killing my multi before it even gets started.

I’m hearing you. Thursday night footy sucks [emoji17]

Booney wrote:******* wanker goal reviewers killing my multi before it even gets started.

Damn AFL and their Jaycar budget camera packs

Either a coach or captain has to cop a fine from the AFL and on behalf of everyone in club and supporter land call the goal review out for what it is, an absolute farce.

Leon Cameron should have given it "Enough is enough, if this costs us a top 2 or top 4 spot it will be on the AFL's head".

Was touched 100% but after ANZAC Day and Rampe’s King Kong impersonation I’ll take it.
If the roles were reversed everyone would be saying suck shite Essendon [emoji23]

so the bombers get a win due to dodgy circumstances. I look forward everyone on here ripping into bombers supporters about this.

woodublieve12 wrote:so the bombers get a win due to dodgy circumstances. I look forward everyone on here ripping into bombers supporters about this.

They have, go back a page or 2

woodublieve12 wrote:so the bombers get a win due to dodgy circumstances. I look forward everyone on here ripping into bombers supporters about this.

Bombers got the win because GWS are front runners and shit away from home.

woodublieve12 wrote:so the bombers get a win due to dodgy circumstances. I look forward everyone on here ripping into bombers supporters about this.

I think the comments about blatant cheating by the umpires and the inability to get a score review right cover that off.

#dogs16

MW wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:so the bombers get a win due to dodgy circumstances. I look forward everyone on here ripping into bombers supporters about this.

Bombers got the win because GWS are front runners and shit away from home.

After watching the replay it’s pretty clear we had a bit of assistance in the final 10-15 minutes. I think most of them were technically frees or atleast 50/50’s that we were on the right side of. The mark to the GWS big fella on the wing and the non HTB against Heppell were glaring mistakes our way.
Maybe they felt sorry for us after GWS had a good run early

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:so the bombers get a win due to dodgy circumstances. I look forward everyone on here ripping into bombers supporters about this.

I think the comments about blatant cheating by the umpires and the inability to get a score review right cover that off.

#dogs16

29-14 free kicks in favour of the bombers. Funnily enough, very similar free kick ratio to the 2016 gf. Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

What a beautiful morning.

Just before half time Bellchambers is running defensively through the middle of the ground as Hurley gathers the ball, gives it to Francis, Francis dishes off to Bellchambers who may/may not have had prior but gets tackled, he goes to ground and the ball bobbles out, he pulls it back in, the tackler goes in again and in a union style "release" Bellchambers pushes the ball out the back to a teammate who takes the ball away.

It's those sorts of decisions that have me turn the TV off. I did.

What about this phantom mark to GWS that cost us a goal!

[img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190628/147f6261092493997a044121bd9cb67e.gif[/img]

Attention "Tapatalk" users, your gifs and emojis do not show up for the rest of us.

Booney wrote:Attention "Tapatalk" users, your gifs and emojis do not show up for the rest of us.

They have been playing up whilst trying to load them.


Anyway this is the incident

woodublieve12 wrote:Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

Except when Rampe climbed & shook the post which should’ve been a 50m penalty to Essendon which would have won them the game or except when Goldstein was blatantly held in a ruck contest in the forward pocket which should’ve been paid & would’ve resulted in North goal & win - but hey, it’s “Vic bias”...