by Ron Burgundy » Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:18 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:55 pm
Ron Burgundy wrote:Considering SC takes into account the how efficient possessions are, whether a possession won is contested, and doesnt reward ineffective possessions and clangers it gives a pretty good indication of how well a player is going i would have though.
by bloods08 » Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:01 pm
by JK » Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:39 pm
by OnSong » Sat Mar 19, 2011 11:24 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Gray, Tippett and Vince are picked more on potential (which I can understand, particularly for the first 2 of those), Pearce for entertainment I guess (although he doesn't rate that high for mine).
I loathe Rucci, but I dont think he's actually done too bad here.
by Wedgie » Sat Mar 19, 2011 11:38 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Mar 20, 2011 1:15 am
Wedgie wrote:Yeah except for his No 1
by Booney » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:32 am
Wedgie wrote:Yeah except for his No 1 and some Adelaide and Port players who shouldn't be there I much preferred Rucci's effort, don't say that too often.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:52 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Wedgie wrote:Yeah except for his No 1
I actually think Goddard is the best player in the competition. Who do you think should be there?
by Bag The Points » Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:55 am
by CK » Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:09 am
by catchisthecry » Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:59 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |