by lesthemechanic » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:26 am
by Voice » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:17 am
Turbo wrote:Disagree. We should have probably won. The only real difference was we kicked inaccurately and J Brown. Other than that it was a tough fought match where both sides showed plenty.
It shows Carlton aren't far off. The inclusion of Judd and Bower will help. I do agree that we need more depth but there would also a majority of teams that would say the same.
by gadj1976 » Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:48 pm
by Voice » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:53 pm
by gadj1976 » Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:50 am
Voice wrote:I expected to see a team that going forward after 7 years of rebuilding. This year we look to be going backward again.
by whufc » Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:31 am
gadj1976 wrote:Voice wrote:I expected to see a team that going forward after 7 years of rebuilding. This year we look to be going backward again.
You're kidding? So you lose a near 100 goal full forward and you expect to go forward?
Voice, I just think your expectations are way more than most of the rest of the football world. We ALMOST beat Brisbane up there in our second game without our full forward of the previous 10 years, which was a great effort.
In the cold heart of day I agree with most of your points (not Browne/Armfield/Anderson nor Russell), but I can't work out why you'd reckon we'll go forward this year without Fev, that's all.
Remember when they were winning flags, we were the equivalent of a Melbourne or Richmond now. Hopeless, no spirit, no idea and no draft picks. Our base at that time was deplorable. To compare the two clubs will make you go crazy. If you try and do that, I could say "why aren't we better than Adelaide every year", cos they've never had a decent draft pick but they've hardly ever been outside the top 8. Why compare, it'll do your head in. It's not just about accruing no1 draft picks. No success has ever been attributed to having x amount of no1 draft picks.
Of course I don't want mediocrity, but for 11 years our guys have looked up and kicked it to Fev. Give them some time to get used to having Henderson, Kreuzer or Warnock up there.
by gadj1976 » Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:35 am
whufc wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Voice wrote:I expected to see a team that going forward after 7 years of rebuilding. This year we look to be going backward again.
You're kidding? So you lose a near 100 goal full forward and you expect to go forward?
Voice, I just think your expectations are way more than most of the rest of the football world. We ALMOST beat Brisbane up there in our second game without our full forward of the previous 10 years, which was a great effort.
In the cold heart of day I agree with most of your points (not Browne/Armfield/Anderson nor Russell), but I can't work out why you'd reckon we'll go forward this year without Fev, that's all.
Remember when they were winning flags, we were the equivalent of a Melbourne or Richmond now. Hopeless, no spirit, no idea and no draft picks. Our base at that time was deplorable. To compare the two clubs will make you go crazy. If you try and do that, I could say "why aren't we better than Adelaide every year", cos they've never had a decent draft pick but they've hardly ever been outside the top 8. Why compare, it'll do your head in. It's not just about accruing no1 draft picks. No success has ever been attributed to having x amount of no1 draft picks.
Of course I don't want mediocrity, but for 11 years our guys have looked up and kicked it to Fev. Give them some time to get used to having Henderson, Kreuzer or Warnock up there.
I think Vocie means after 7 years of rebuilding we really should be a top 4 contender, instead we will be lucky to make the top 8, you can only rebuild for so long before your players should start taking resposnibilty.
There are players that have been on the Carlton list for 4-5 years and are still rubbish wtf.
by whufc » Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:40 am
gadj1976 wrote:whufc wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Voice wrote:I expected to see a team that going forward after 7 years of rebuilding. This year we look to be going backward again.
You're kidding? So you lose a near 100 goal full forward and you expect to go forward?
Voice, I just think your expectations are way more than most of the rest of the football world. We ALMOST beat Brisbane up there in our second game without our full forward of the previous 10 years, which was a great effort.
In the cold heart of day I agree with most of your points (not Browne/Armfield/Anderson nor Russell), but I can't work out why you'd reckon we'll go forward this year without Fev, that's all.
Remember when they were winning flags, we were the equivalent of a Melbourne or Richmond now. Hopeless, no spirit, no idea and no draft picks. Our base at that time was deplorable. To compare the two clubs will make you go crazy. If you try and do that, I could say "why aren't we better than Adelaide every year", cos they've never had a decent draft pick but they've hardly ever been outside the top 8. Why compare, it'll do your head in. It's not just about accruing no1 draft picks. No success has ever been attributed to having x amount of no1 draft picks.
Of course I don't want mediocrity, but for 11 years our guys have looked up and kicked it to Fev. Give them some time to get used to having Henderson, Kreuzer or Warnock up there.
I think Vocie means after 7 years of rebuilding we really should be a top 4 contender, instead we will be lucky to make the top 8, you can only rebuild for so long before your players should start taking resposnibilty.
There are players that have been on the Carlton list for 4-5 years and are still rubbish wtf.
I think under normal circumstances we would be pushing top 4. But we won't. We've lost our leading goalkicker, so let's be realistic.
by Bladder » Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:41 pm
by Turbo » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:16 pm
lesthemechanic wrote:Fevola - 3, Henderson - 3. The trade is a draw so far.
I agree, Johnathon Brown was the difference, a great game by the captain, showed great leadership.
by Turbo » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:17 pm
Voice wrote:Turbo wrote:Disagree. We should have probably won. The only real difference was we kicked inaccurately and J Brown. Other than that it was a tough fought match where both sides showed plenty.
It shows Carlton aren't far off. The inclusion of Judd and Bower will help. I do agree that we need more depth but there would also a majority of teams that would say the same.
Not the good teams though. How many years of draft picks and building a group do we need before we get that depth, we should be at that stage now.
That first line is an interesting statement. What I get from that is we should have probably won even though The Lions kicking was better, they had a match winner etc, so they were the better team. How does that mean we should of won? We didn't just kick inaccurately for goal. We kicked inaccurately everywhere on the field. I don't think there is any way we should have even been in that game, let alone win.
Just a question. You don't think it was some of the worst footy you've seen in the first half? I watched it twice now and it is cringeworthy to me.
I understand we were still in it and that is all you can ask but I think that was more a reflection on Brisbanes mids than any good play from us (except for the 10 minute patch where we looked fantastic).
Another question, did you see all the ducking and pants shitting that was going on in the first half? How many years until we get bigger bodies. Joey Anderson ducked and spilled marks numerous times, Murphy watched players come at him and moved out of the way.
I'm not having a crack at you Turbo, it's interesting how people see things differently.
You got any comments on my assessment of the players and which to keep and which we still need to dump?
by Voice » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:16 pm
Turbo wrote:lesthemechanic wrote:Fevola - 3, Henderson - 3. The trade is a draw so far.
I agree, Johnathon Brown was the difference, a great game by the captain, showed great leadership.
Henderson is having a dip, and will only get better
by Voice » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:18 pm
Turbo wrote:Voice wrote:Turbo wrote:Disagree. We should have probably won. The only real difference was we kicked inaccurately and J Brown. Other than that it was a tough fought match where both sides showed plenty.
It shows Carlton aren't far off. The inclusion of Judd and Bower will help. I do agree that we need more depth but there would also a majority of teams that would say the same.
Not the good teams though. How many years of draft picks and building a group do we need before we get that depth, we should be at that stage now.
That first line is an interesting statement. What I get from that is we should have probably won even though The Lions kicking was better, they had a match winner etc, so they were the better team. How does that mean we should of won? We didn't just kick inaccurately for goal. We kicked inaccurately everywhere on the field. I don't think there is any way we should have even been in that game, let alone win.
Just a question. You don't think it was some of the worst footy you've seen in the first half? I watched it twice now and it is cringeworthy to me.
I understand we were still in it and that is all you can ask but I think that was more a reflection on Brisbanes mids than any good play from us (except for the 10 minute patch where we looked fantastic).
Another question, did you see all the ducking and pants shitting that was going on in the first half? How many years until we get bigger bodies. Joey Anderson ducked and spilled marks numerous times, Murphy watched players come at him and moved out of the way.
I'm not having a crack at you Turbo, it's interesting how people see things differently.
You got any comments on my assessment of the players and which to keep and which we still need to dump?
No comments about your player assessments. Too early in the season to judge
by Turbo » Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:19 am
Voice wrote:Turbo wrote:Voice wrote:Turbo wrote:Disagree. We should have probably won. The only real difference was we kicked inaccurately and J Brown. Other than that it was a tough fought match where both sides showed plenty.
It shows Carlton aren't far off. The inclusion of Judd and Bower will help. I do agree that we need more depth but there would also a majority of teams that would say the same.
Not the good teams though. How many years of draft picks and building a group do we need before we get that depth, we should be at that stage now.
That first line is an interesting statement. What I get from that is we should have probably won even though The Lions kicking was better, they had a match winner etc, so they were the better team. How does that mean we should of won? We didn't just kick inaccurately for goal. We kicked inaccurately everywhere on the field. I don't think there is any way we should have even been in that game, let alone win.
Just a question. You don't think it was some of the worst footy you've seen in the first half? I watched it twice now and it is cringeworthy to me.
I understand we were still in it and that is all you can ask but I think that was more a reflection on Brisbanes mids than any good play from us (except for the 10 minute patch where we looked fantastic).
Another question, did you see all the ducking and pants shitting that was going on in the first half? How many years until we get bigger bodies. Joey Anderson ducked and spilled marks numerous times, Murphy watched players come at him and moved out of the way.
I'm not having a crack at you Turbo, it's interesting how people see things differently.
You got any comments on my assessment of the players and which to keep and which we still need to dump?
No comments about your player assessments. Too early in the season to judge
Fair enough. I am going on the last 4 years when I make those assessments though. Not just on how they've performed this year. I just reckon there's too many that just aren't up to it and would struggle to make any other list except Richmond and Melbourne.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Apr 06, 2010 1:35 pm
by The Jack » Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:02 pm
Turbo wrote:
Big game against the Bombers. We'll see how well some of the so called depth players go in a blockbuster
by overloaded » Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:21 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Turbo » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:22 pm
The Jack wrote:Turbo wrote:
Big game against the Bombers. We'll see how well some of the so called depth players go in a blockbuster
And how did that pan out for you Turbo??? So-called pretty well on the money do you think?
by Turbo » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:25 pm
overloaded wrote:carlton are week, 6 losses in a row coming up. no forward line. over reated midfielders
by Turbo » Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:38 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |