by The Sleeping Giant » Thu May 09, 2013 5:01 pm
by Squids » Thu May 09, 2013 6:42 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:How about Carltank.
by Jim05 » Thu May 09, 2013 6:50 pm
Squids wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:How about Carltank.
When you don't get an extra million dollars in the cap its a necessity.
by Squids » Thu May 09, 2013 6:52 pm
Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:How about Carltank.
When you don't get an extra million dollars in the cap its a necessity.
How so?
Plenty of other sides have rebounded after poor seasons without resorting to deliberate tanking
by Jim05 » Thu May 09, 2013 7:07 pm
Squids wrote:Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:How about Carltank.
When you don't get an extra million dollars in the cap its a necessity.
How so?
Plenty of other sides have rebounded after poor seasons without resorting to deliberate tanking
Like?
by Squids » Thu May 09, 2013 7:10 pm
Jim05 wrote:Hawthorn, Geelong, West Coast, they all bottomed out but didnt throw games
Even Port last year, didnt see them turn up their toes to lose deliberately to gain picks and look at their turn around this year. It can be done
by Jim05 » Thu May 09, 2013 7:14 pm
Squids wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hawthorn, Geelong, West Coast, they all bottomed out but didnt throw games
Even Port last year, didnt see them turn up their toes to lose deliberately to gain picks and look at their turn around this year. It can be done
My lord...if you don't think West Coast were tanking then you really don't have a clue. Port were clearly not trying last year. Geelong have a huge asterix and have had luck with father-son selections. I remember Hawthorn being crud for a very long time.
by Jim05 » Thu May 09, 2013 7:21 pm
by whufc » Thu May 09, 2013 7:21 pm
Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hawthorn, Geelong, West Coast, they all bottomed out but didnt throw games
Even Port last year, didnt see them turn up their toes to lose deliberately to gain picks and look at their turn around this year. It can be done
My lord...if you don't think West Coast were tanking then you really don't have a clue. Port were clearly not trying last year. Geelong have a huge asterix and have had luck with father-son selections. I remember Hawthorn being crud for a very long time.
My memory of West Coasts season was they had a heap of injuries, lost a few to retirement and had some bad luck.
I thought they were still competitive that season. Maybe im wrong but I dont think they tanked.
Port were just coached by a crap coach, they were better than they showed last year
by Squids » Thu May 09, 2013 7:23 pm
Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hawthorn, Geelong, West Coast, they all bottomed out but didnt throw games
Even Port last year, didnt see them turn up their toes to lose deliberately to gain picks and look at their turn around this year. It can be done
My lord...if you don't think West Coast were tanking then you really don't have a clue. Port were clearly not trying last year. Geelong have a huge asterix and have had luck with father-son selections. I remember Hawthorn being crud for a very long time.
My memory of West Coasts season was they had a heap of injuries, lost a few to retirement and had some bad luck.
I thought they were still competitive that season. Maybe im wrong but I dont think they tanked.
Port were just coached by a crap coach, they were better than they showed last year
by Jim05 » Thu May 09, 2013 7:25 pm
Squids wrote:Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hawthorn, Geelong, West Coast, they all bottomed out but didnt throw games
Even Port last year, didnt see them turn up their toes to lose deliberately to gain picks and look at their turn around this year. It can be done
My lord...if you don't think West Coast were tanking then you really don't have a clue. Port were clearly not trying last year. Geelong have a huge asterix and have had luck with father-son selections. I remember Hawthorn being crud for a very long time.
My memory of West Coasts season was they had a heap of injuries, lost a few to retirement and had some bad luck.
I thought they were still competitive that season. Maybe im wrong but I dont think they tanked.
Port were just coached by a crap coach, they were better than they showed last year
Well looking at the FACTS again shows they copped a few 60 points hidings and many 5 goals losses.
by Squids » Thu May 09, 2013 8:00 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu May 09, 2013 8:08 pm
by Squids » Thu May 09, 2013 8:44 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Does that last post make sense to anyone?
by stan » Thu May 09, 2013 9:53 pm
Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hawthorn, Geelong, West Coast, they all bottomed out but didnt throw games
Even Port last year, didnt see them turn up their toes to lose deliberately to gain picks and look at their turn around this year. It can be done
My lord...if you don't think West Coast were tanking then you really don't have a clue. Port were clearly not trying last year. Geelong have a huge asterix and have had luck with father-son selections. I remember Hawthorn being crud for a very long time.
My memory of West Coasts season was they had a heap of injuries, lost a few to retirement and had some bad luck.
I thought they were still competitive that season. Maybe im wrong but I dont think they tanked.
Port were just coached by a crap coach, they were better than they showed last year
by Squids » Thu May 09, 2013 10:06 pm
stan wrote:Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hawthorn, Geelong, West Coast, they all bottomed out but didnt throw games
Even Port last year, didnt see them turn up their toes to lose deliberately to gain picks and look at their turn around this year. It can be done
My lord...if you don't think West Coast were tanking then you really don't have a clue. Port were clearly not trying last year. Geelong have a huge asterix and have had luck with father-son selections. I remember Hawthorn being crud for a very long time.
My memory of West Coasts season was they had a heap of injuries, lost a few to retirement and had some bad luck.
I thought they were still competitive that season. Maybe im wrong but I dont think they tanked.
Port were just coached by a crap coach, they were better than they showed last year
Geez you thought that we were tanking in 2010 I assume? To gain what exactly? Finish with a spoon and only pick 4?
Probably not the best year to tank now is it.
Are we tanking this year? Sure bloody seems like it.
by Turbo » Thu May 09, 2013 10:09 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:How about Carltank.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu May 09, 2013 10:35 pm
by gadj1976 » Fri May 10, 2013 7:19 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Squids has confirmed it.
by Squids » Fri May 10, 2013 10:26 pm
gadj1976 wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Squids has confirmed it.
so it's coming from a reliable source then
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |