SA Footy

tigerpie wrote:If Dane beams wants to go back to Melbourne would we be keen?

He didn't leave on bad terms from memory?

He'd be handy.

Bombers are into him big time. Apparently Beams won’t go back to Collingwood whilst Buckley is there

Interesting that its not been discussed in the media.
No one has asked the question at a presser.
No need as everyone in the media knows it won't happen?

tigerpie wrote:Interesting that its not been discussed in the media.
No one has asked the question at a presser.
No need as everyone in the media knows it won't happen?

Both us and North have came out in the last day or so in the Melbourne media and stated we aren’t interested. I believe that is a bit of smoke and mirrors though atleast on our behalf

Jim05 wrote:

tigerpie wrote:Interesting that its not been discussed in the media.
No one has asked the question at a presser.
No need as everyone in the media knows it won't happen?

Both us and North have came out in the last day or so in the Melbourne media and stated we aren’t interested. I believe that is a bit of smoke and mirrors though atleast on our behalf

From a collingwood perspective we are quiet because we aren't interested.....
Or its going to be a bolt from the blue smash and grab mission.

tigerpie wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

tigerpie wrote:Interesting that its not been discussed in the media.
No one has asked the question at a presser.
No need as everyone in the media knows it won't happen?

Both us and North have came out in the last day or so in the Melbourne media and stated we aren’t interested. I believe that is a bit of smoke and mirrors though atleast on our behalf

From a collingwood perspective we are quiet because we aren't interested.....
Or its going to be a bolt from the blue smash and grab mission.

You're getting Lynch, that's why you're not interested.

Booney wrote:

tigerpie wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

tigerpie wrote:Interesting that its not been discussed in the media.
No one has asked the question at a presser.
No need as everyone in the media knows it won't happen?

Both us and North have came out in the last day or so in the Melbourne media and stated we aren’t interested. I believe that is a bit of smoke and mirrors though atleast on our behalf

From a collingwood perspective we are quiet because we aren't interested.....
Or its going to be a bolt from the blue smash and grab mission.

You're getting Lynch, that's why you're not interested.

Are they????

Beams no chance

Lynch won't be at Collingwood next year....

woodublieve12 wrote:Lynch won't be at Collingwood next year....

100% he will.

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:Lynch won't be at Collingwood next year....

100% he will.

78% sure he won't be

woodublieve12 wrote:

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:Lynch won't be at Collingwood next year....

100% he will.

78% sure he won't be

100% that one of you will be right and the other will be wrong

mots02 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:Lynch won't be at Collingwood next year....

100% he will.

78% sure he won't be

100% that one of you will be right and the other will be wrong

We might both be wrong, there's 15 other clubs he could end up at.

( He won't ).

he'll be at Sydney next year... You can quote me on that...

woodublieve12 wrote:he'll be at Sydney next year... You can quote me on that...

Oh we will.
You think another buddy smokescreen?
Won't happen he'll be in black and white next year.

1.4mil a year over 4 years.... Or something similar to that

Booney wrote:

mots02 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Booney wrote:


100% he will.

78% sure he won't be

100% that one of you will be right and the other will be wrong

We might both be wrong, there's 15 other clubs he could end up at.

( He won't ).

If he's at another club then wubbsy will be 100% right.

If he's at collingwood then you're 100% right.

My prediction still stands

woodublieve12 wrote:1.4mil a year over 4 years.... Or something similar to that

"Quote me on that, or something similar"

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:1.4mil a year over 4 years.... Or something similar to that

"Quote me on that, or something similar"

quote me on that he'll be a swan next year, not the financials.

woodublieve12 wrote:

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:1.4mil a year over 4 years.... Or something similar to that

"Quote me on that, or something similar"

quote me on that he'll be a swan next year, not the financials.

Where's he fitting into the cap? or have you guys picked up another sponsorship with either...

Coca..
Pepsi...
RC...
Buzz...

mots02 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:1.4mil a year over 4 years.... Or something similar to that

"Quote me on that, or something similar"

quote me on that he'll be a swan next year, not the financials.

Where's he fitting into the cap? or have you guys picked up another sponsorship with either...

Coca..
Pepsi...
RC...
Buzz...

We have plenty of room...
Barely recruited since buddy, few have retired and a few more moved on. there will be room for Lynch and Moore to waltz straight in...

As long as we can get Blakey in the Draft I will be stoked

lets not forget the swans have probably have one of the best off field teams in the comp...