Match Review Panel

[D14]

You don't need to lift someones arm to stop them from handballing, just hold it.

[overloaded]

[
Very low act on a bloke who was defenceless, that is my biggest issue, Adams could offer no resistence and Judd knew it.

I thinks this sums it up. Wasnt looking and had no resistance!

Where was that brain fade thread?

[CUTTERMAN]

It will be interesting if the MRP has the balls to judge this as intentional and send it straight to the tribunal, if they don't deem it intentional (how could they not), their language and excuses will be just as interesting if not comical.

[Turbo]

It will be interesting if the MRP has the balls to judge this as intentional and send it straight to the tribunal, if they don't deem it intentional (how could they not), their language and excuses will be just as interesting if not comical.

Pretty sure Jackson from the tigers dislocated Harvey's arm in the same sort of incident 'described as a chicken wing tackle'. MRP said he had no case to answer. The precedent has been set and should be followed.

[Booney]

His report has been changed to "Rough conduct" not "misconduct".

Misconduct would be straight to the tribunal.

Rough conduct will be given a penalty by the MRP.

Pretty sure Jackson from the tigers dislocated Harvey's arm in the same sort of incident 'described as a chicken wing tackle'. MRP said he had no case to answer. The precedent has been set and should be followed.

Thats a set up for "watch me cry out loud" if I've ever seen one.

[CUTTERMAN]

It will be interesting if the MRP has the balls to judge this as intentional and send it straight to the tribunal, if they don't deem it intentional (how could they not), their language and excuses will be just as interesting if not comical.

Pretty sure Jackson from the tigers dislocated Harvey's arm in the same sort of incident 'described as a chicken wing tackle'. MRP said he had no case to answer. The precedent has been set and should be followed.

Precedent? MRP? Got no idea what you're talking about!
On a slightly more serious note, I don't think the MRP is allowed to look at precedents in their judgements.

[Turbo]

His report has been changed to "Rough conduct" not "misconduct".

Misconduct would be straight to the tribunal.

Rough conduct will be given a penalty by the MRP.

Pretty sure Jackson from the tigers dislocated Harvey's arm in the same sort of incident 'described as a chicken wing tackle'. MRP said he had no case to answer. The precedent has been set and should be followed.

Thats a set up for "watch me cry out loud" if I've ever seen one.

Well we all talk about consistency. That is all I'm after

[Booney]

When was the Jackson incident?

[the milky bar kid]

His report has been changed to "Rough conduct" not "misconduct".

Misconduct would be straight to the tribunal.

Rough conduct will be given a penalty by the MRP.

Pretty sure Jackson from the tigers dislocated Harvey's arm in the same sort of incident 'described as a chicken wing tackle'. MRP said he had no case to answer. The precedent has been set and should be followed.

Thats a set up for "watch me cry out loud" if I've ever seen one.

Well we all talk about consistency. That is all I'm after

30 years ago Wellingham wouldn't have been sighted, where's the consistency???

[Lightning McQueen]

It will be interesting if the MRP has the balls to judge this as intentional and send it straight to the tribunal, if they don't deem it intentional (how could they not), their language and excuses will be just as interesting if not comical.

Pretty sure Jackson from the tigers dislocated Harvey's arm in the same sort of incident 'described as a chicken wing tackle'. MRP said he had no case to answer. The precedent has been set and should be followed.

Ease up Turbo! I'm a Judd lover but that was disgraceful, 2 minimum regardless of carry overs etc.

[HH3]

If the medical report stats his arm was dislocated from Juddy twisting it (which it is rumoured to), he should be out for at least 3. Very malicious and there was no other reason to do it besides trying to take him out of the game.

[Turbo]

When was the Jackson incident?

2009. It's on the afl website. Can't link it on my phone

[dee man]

There was no real malice in it. Was smart actually, since he could not get release the ball, IIRC Judd got a free for holding the ball. Not Judds problem the Adams has weak shoulders.

YOU ARE KIDDING ME MATE
THAT IS THE WORST POST I HAVE EVER READ

[Turbo]

His report has been changed to "Rough conduct" not "misconduct".

Misconduct would be straight to the tribunal.

Rough conduct will be given a penalty by the MRP.

Pretty sure Jackson from the tigers dislocated Harvey's arm in the same sort of incident 'described as a chicken wing tackle'. MRP said he had no case to answer. The precedent has been set and should be followed.

Thats a set up for "watch me cry out loud" if I've ever seen one.

Well we all talk about consistency. That is all I'm after

30 years ago Wellingham wouldn't have been sighted, where's the consistency???

Stupid comment

[Mythical Creature]

If the medical report stats his arm was dislocated from Juddy twisting it (which it is rumoured to), he should be out for at least 3. Very malicious and there was no other reason to do it besides trying to take him out of the game.

This. Juddy WADH

[Lightning McQueen]

There was no real malice in it. Was smart actually, since he could not get release the ball, IIRC Judd got a free for holding the ball. Not Judds problem the Adams has weak shoulders.

YOU ARE KIDDING ME MATE
THAT IS THE WORST POST I HAVE EVER READ

cue overloaded!

[the milky bar kid]

30 years ago Wellingham wouldn't have been sighted, where's the consistency???

Stupid comment

Come on Turbo,
It has some relevance.
We all want some consistency from the tribunal (which has been terribly inconsistent of late, especially with the new points system, different argument).
However times have changed & anything that is deemed dangerous should be removed from the game like the AFL are currently attempting to do. Haven’t seen the example from the past, but there is no need to justify a mistake that was made in the past, two wrongs don’t make a right…
This was dangerous & rightly should have an example made of it, no matter who committed the offence.

Maybe he could use the “I didn’t mean to grab his arm & twist it dangerously defense”, similar to the “I didn’t mean to elbow him in the head defense” that got him off the striking charge against Pavlich

[Sorry Dude]

If the medical report stats his arm was dislocated from Juddy twisting it (which it is rumoured to), he should be out for at least 3. Very malicious and there was no other reason to do it besides trying to take him out of the game.

This. Juddy WADH

Adams is likely to play this week (on the AFL website (North Melbourne Chief), "Although McDonald refused to comment on what North's medical report would reveal about Judd's role in Adams' injury, AFL.com.au understands the report will reveal Adams' shoulder was dislocated in the incident.
However, McDonald said Adams remained a chance to play against Richmond this Sunday".

I think with just this information alone he will get off, and because the MRP are inconsistent!

[overloaded]

There was no real malice in it. Was smart actually, since he could not get release the ball, IIRC Judd got a free for holding the ball. Not Judds problem the Adams has weak shoulders.

YOU ARE KIDDING ME MATE
THAT IS THE WORST POST I HAVE EVER READ

cue overloaded!

I agree

[Booney]

CARLTON captain Chris Judd will face the AFL Tribunal over his controversial 'chicken-wing' tackle on North Melbourne's Leigh Adams after the match review panel chose to send the case straight to the judiciary.

Judd was reported by a boundary umpire and charged with rough conduct over for the second-quarter incident on Friday night in which he wrenched Adams' arm back while the Kangaroos midfielder lay on the ground with Andrew Carrazzo on top of him.

The medical report tabled by North Melbourne to the MRP is understood to have said that the tackle dislocated Adams' shoulder

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

No penalty by the MRP then, straight to the tribunal...