Will the Adelaide Oval Redevelopment go ahead?

[AFLflyer]

lol @ people telling Dutchy with 21st century thoughts to move on and that times have changed when they're stuck in the 20th century, if not further back.
Yeah move on Dutchy, move on to 1960 and before and have the same thoughts as these people!
SA The Backward State.

Not everyone is thinking like it is 1960.

Can I ask though, why the interest in this? You dont go to Footy Park, you think Adelaide Oval is a hole and proudly proclaim your last vote at the State election. I'd figure you would have no interest in this debate at all.

Do you think a purpose built, covered ( or not ) stadium is the way to go, or just keep what we already have. I'll be interested to hear what the best outcome in your opinion is?

he has been asked this twice before, maybe you will have a better shot in getting something from him?

[Royal City]

Thought it was a good debate being one of the most important decisions our city has had to make for quite a while, many pro AO posters are getting very defensive when the questions have been asked. Now Im being told to stop debating/discussing?

I actually work 2 floors above the SMA, maybe Ill go have a coffee with them and stop any discussion on here....

Dont take it personally Dutchy. Just state your position and move on mate.

This is not a debate. Its an attack SACA members for not having the same priorities as the caring for everyone elses needs not their own football fans.

These are the same people that label their own supporters as selfish for putting their families finances ahead of the ridiculous price increase facing AFl fans. Simply cos they wont sacrifice themselves for the bigger picture.

DISGRACEFUL!!!!!

[Royal City]

lol @ people telling Dutchy with 21st century thoughts to move on and that times have changed when they're stuck in the 20th century, if not further back.
Yeah move on Dutchy, move on to 1960 and before and have the same thoughts as these people!
SA The Backward State.

Not everyone is thinking like it is 1960.

Can I ask though, why the interest in this? You dont go to Footy Park, you think Adelaide Oval is a hole and proudly proclaim your last vote at the State election. I'd figure you would have no interest in this debate at all.

Do you think a purpose built, covered ( or not ) stadium is the way to go, or just keep what we already have. I'll be interested to hear what the best outcome in your opinion is?

he has been asked this twice before, maybe you will have a better shot in getting something from him?

i thought this was an important topic for all and its imperative we think of the bigger picture for this state when discussing this proposal.

Is Wedgie not allowed to have an opinion on the bigger picture for the state ???

Just you blokes.

You AFL fans love your contradictions dont you.

Next youll be as bad as Rucci and making out the only reason Wedgie is against this. Is due to blind loytalty to an X SANFL President that hasnt had anything to do with the league in how many years ?????

[OnSong]

Thought it was a good debate being one of the most important decisions our city has had to make for quite a while, many pro AO posters are getting very defensive when the questions have been asked. Now Im being told to stop debating/discussing?

I actually work 2 floors above the SMA, maybe Ill go have a coffee with them and stop any discussion on here....

Dont take it personally Dutchy. Just state your position and move on mate.

This is not a debate. Its an attack SACA members for not having the same priorities as the caring for everyone elses needs not their own football fans.

These are the same people that label their own supporters as selfish for putting their families finances ahead of the ridiculous price increase facing AFl fans. Simply cos they wont sacrifice themselves for the bigger picture.

DISGRACEFUL!!!!!

I'm almost convinced you're just trolling for a response now.

[Q.]

Thought it was a good debate being one of the most important decisions our city has had to make for quite a while, many pro AO posters are getting very defensive when the questions have been asked. Now Im being told to stop debating/discussing?

I actually work 2 floors above the SMA, maybe Ill go have a coffee with them and stop any discussion on here....

Dont take it personally Dutchy. Just state your position and move on mate.

This is not a debate. Its an attack SACA members for not having the same priorities as the caring for everyone elses needs not their own football fans.

These are the same people that label their own supporters as selfish for putting their families finances ahead of the ridiculous price increase facing AFl fans. Simply cos they wont sacrifice themselves for the bigger picture.

DISGRACEFUL!!!!!

I'm almost convinced you're just trolling for a response now.

Well known for his anti-AFL rants elsewhere, I think it's best to ignore RC and his obvious bias.

[Booney]

lol @ people telling Dutchy with 21st century thoughts to move on and that times have changed when they're stuck in the 20th century, if not further back.
Yeah move on Dutchy, move on to 1960 and before and have the same thoughts as these people!
SA The Backward State.

Not everyone is thinking like it is 1960.

Can I ask though, why the interest in this? You dont go to Footy Park, you think Adelaide Oval is a hole and proudly proclaim your last vote at the State election. I'd figure you would have no interest in this debate at all.

Do you think a purpose built, covered ( or not ) stadium is the way to go, or just keep what we already have. I'll be interested to hear what the best outcome in your opinion is?

Hasnt Wedgie stated his position on the second stadium 10 times on this debate already,
Or am I imaging it.
This move is important to all SANFL supporters IMHO. A lot of ramificiations to SANFL clubs if the SA-AFl clubs keep failing the way they are.

He may have, but once I see you looking for an argument in a thread I dont tend to read it too closely. Just gloss over it to be honest.

[AFLflyer]

haha, RC's credibilty is glowing at the moment on this thread.

[Royal City]

lol @ people telling Dutchy with 21st century thoughts to move on and that times have changed when they're stuck in the 20th century, if not further back.
Yeah move on Dutchy, move on to 1960 and before and have the same thoughts as these people!
SA The Backward State.

Not everyone is thinking like it is 1960.

Can I ask though, why the interest in this? You dont go to Footy Park, you think Adelaide Oval is a hole and proudly proclaim your last vote at the State election. I'd figure you would have no interest in this debate at all.

Do you think a purpose built, covered ( or not ) stadium is the way to go, or just keep what we already have. I'll be interested to hear what the best outcome in your opinion is?

Hasnt Wedgie stated his position on the second stadium 10 times on this debate already,
Or am I imaging it.
This move is important to all SANFL supporters IMHO. A lot of ramificiations to SANFL clubs if the SA-AFl clubs keep failing the way they are.

He may have, but once I see you looking for an argument in a thread I dont tend to read it too closely. Just gloss over it to be honest.

So the guy that just jumped into a 22 page debate without reading any of it and starts questioning wedgies clearlystated stance and why he even cares.

Just honestly wanted to add to the debate.

And didnt want to argue with anyone.

The ego on some people.

[Royal City]

Thought it was a good debate being one of the most important decisions our city has had to make for quite a while, many pro AO posters are getting very defensive when the questions have been asked. Now Im being told to stop debating/discussing?

I actually work 2 floors above the SMA, maybe Ill go have a coffee with them and stop any discussion on here....

Dont take it personally Dutchy. Just state your position and move on mate.

This is not a debate. Its an attack SACA members for not having the same priorities as the caring for everyone elses needs not their own football fans.

These are the same people that label their own supporters as selfish for putting their families finances ahead of the ridiculous price increase facing AFl fans. Simply cos they wont sacrifice themselves for the bigger picture.

DISGRACEFUL!!!!!

I'm almost convinced you're just trolling for a response now.

Well known for his anti-AFL rants elsewhere, I think it's best to ignore RC and his obvious bias.

What a surprise for the 50th time "we cant argue with facts so lets just make up his motivation".

Another woeful attempt.

Im very surprised Quichey felt it necessary to jump on this debate. No way he is a AFL dream team/super coach playing tragic. Best we just ignore him so he can work out if Robbie Nahas is a good buy.

[Booney]

Ill let you know what we decide.

The ego on some people.

Hard to fathom. Isn't it?

[Q.]

Well known for his anti-AFL rants elsewhere, I think it's best to ignore RC and his obvious bias.

What a surprise for the 50th time "we cant argue with facts so lets just make up his motivation".

Another woeful attempt.

Im very surprised Quichey felt it necessary to jump on this debate. No way he is a AFL dream team/super coach playing tragic. Best we just ignore him so he can work out if Robbie Nahas is a good buy.

I've been reading the whole thread, attempting to make sense of valuable information versus that which is clearly tainted.

And it's Supercoach. My obsession with ball-use efficiency among AFL players is nerd-like, but probably not relevant here.

[Hondo]

What a surprise for the 50th time "we cant argue with facts so lets just make up his motivation".

I can't believe you just said that!

Mate, that's your standard modus operandi

Why do the moderators let you on this site? Banned before under 2 other usernames and now back again to stalk us and waste our time with your ridiculous posts

[Royal City]

Ill let you know what we decide.

The ego on some people.

Hard to fathom. Isn't it?

so you aren't only writing to add to the debate.

Gee what a surprise it only took two minutes to prove that claim was false.

[Royal City]

What a surprise for the 50th time "we cant argue with facts so lets just make up his motivation".

I can't believe you just said that!

Mate, that's your standard modus operandi

Why do the moderators let you on this site? Banned before under 2 other usernames and now back again to stalk us and waste our time with your ridiculous posts

I'll refer you to whufc summary On you hondo.You need to make it less obvious champ.

Let me guess not any clearer on the proposed rise on afl membership costs emailed to saca members at Adelaide oval ??? Still an irrelevant issue to sa families ?!! still willing to commit all without knowing this vital bit of info.

I wonder if you'll pathetically back peddle on this attack like you did with your feeble attack on dutchys knowledge yesterday.

I have the same opinion on this project as Dutchy and wedgie.

Let me guess we are all just afl haters ??

Well I'll leave you cricket haters to continue your version of a debate.

[AFLflyer]

What a surprise for the 50th time "we cant argue with facts so lets just make up his motivation".

I can't believe you just said that!

Mate, that's your standard modus operandi

Why do the moderators let you on this site? Banned before under 2 other usernames and now back again to stalk us and waste our time with your ridiculous posts

I'll refer you to whufc summary On you hondo.You need to make it less obvious champ.

Let me guess not any clearer on the proposed rise on afl membership costs emailed to saca members at Adelaide oval ??? Still an irrelevant issue to sa families ?!! still willing to commit all without knowing this vital bit of info.

I wonder if you'll pathetically back peddle on this attack like you did with your feeble attack on dutchys knowledge yesterday.

I have the same opinion on this project as Dutchy and wedgie.

Let me guess we are all just afl haters ??

Well I'll leave you cricket haters to continue your version of a debate.

i love cricket

[Wedgie]

I love the AFL, I hate cricket. Dutchy loves both, RC loves cricket and not AFL.

Kind of stuffs up any argument along those lines.

In the 60s we had one oval with footy and cricket that held 50,000 on occasions.

With population growth and 50 years of progression with plans in the meanwhile of bigger and better stadiums where do some people want to be over 50 years later. In the same place but probably worse when it comes to the actual stadium.

Hondo's on one of his off topic anti RC stalking rants he starts when he has nothing and is the stalker, and others are just clutching at straws or can't read. I'll go back to just making the occasional humerous post because apparantley we can't discuss our point of view and have to move on. Anyone have the owners of this site's emails so Dutchy and I can discuss with them being allowed to have an opinion?

Imagine a Sturt and Port supporter discussing this at half time of the 76 Grand Final. "do you know in 35 years time we'll have people wanting to play footy at Adelaide Oval to a smaller crowd than this?" "Turn it up, next you'll tell me Port will have less supporters then than they do now!"

You backward dinosaurs from the middle of last century can continue to swap knitting and war stories now. Carry on George's and Mildreds.

FWIW I don't think Nahas is a good buy this year in Supercoach

Hondo's best post on the debate yet!

Quick DELETE Hondo!

[Hondo]

Hondo's on one of his off topic anti RC stalking rants he starts when he has nothing and is the stalker,

Post reported mate, well done. Not just this sentence, the entire rant.

Now I am anti-Royal City stalker am I? I have "nothing" do I? I am off topic am I?

That's a discraceful post from a moderator. You know he's been banned several times before and yet you paint me as the villian.

You criticise us for questioning if you can have an opinion, yet at the same time you mock ours.

[Royal City]

I love the AFL, I hate cricket. Dutchy loves both, RC loves cricket and not AFL.

Kind of stuffs up any argument along those lines.

In the 60s we had one oval with footy and cricket that held 50,000 on occasions.

With population growth and 50 years of progression with plans in the meanwhile of bigger and better stadiums where do some people want to be over 50 years later. In the same place but probably worse when it comes to the actual stadium.

Hondo's on one of his off topic anti RC stalking rants he starts when he has nothing and is the stalker, and others are just clutching at straws or can't read. I'll go back to just making the occasional humerous post because apparantley we can't discuss our point of view and have to move on. Anyone have the owners of this site's emails so Dutchy and I can discuss with them being allowed to have an opinion?

Imagine a Sturt and Port supporter discussing this at half time of the 76 Grand Final. "do you know in 35 years time we'll have people wanting to play footy at Adelaide Oval to a smaller crowd than this?" "Turn it up, next you'll tell me Port will have less supporters then than they do now!"

You backward dinosaurs from the middle of last century can continue to swap knitting and war stories now. Carry on George's and Mildreds.

FWIW I don't think Nahas is a good buy this year in Supercoach

Hondo's best post on the debate yet!

Quick DELETE Hondo!

Well said!!!!!

You need to make your stalking less obvious Hondo!!!!

[JK]

C'mon lads, let's all take a deep breath .. A lot of you blokes are passionate about your stance on this issue (which is brilliant), but let's not play the man instead of the ball.

[AFLflyer]

"With population growth and 50 years of progression with plans in the meanwhile of bigger and better stadiums where do some people want to be over 50 years later. In the same place but probably worse when it comes to the actual stadium. "

Wedgie this quote is definitley amusing.

you think the stadium will be worse??? Please look through the below link in detail:
http://www.adelaideovalredevelopment.com.au/
why dont you want to accept this just might be a great stadium?