Sack Craig

Talk on the national game

Re: Sack Craig

Postby tiger07andbeyond » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:57 pm

F.O.F.

work out what that stands for and get back to me you weak troll.
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.

tiger07andbeyond
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:12 pm
Location: Holden Hill
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Greenacres

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Felch » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:05 am

tiger07andbeyond wrote:F.O.F.

work out what that stands for and get back to me you weak troll.


Not sure how asking for facts is trolling, or weak... :?
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Jimmy Ricard » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:08 am

And Leigh Brown couldnt get a game at the Kangers, but played in a flag for the Magpies...

What about the recruiting of Dangerfield when everyone else overlooked him ?

Injuries are the no. 1 reason for our predicament - a reason, not an excuse either. Lets get 100 games into guys like Sloane, Dangerfield, Wright, Jacobs, Petrenko, Otten, and see where we are. Put McKay, Davis, Porps, Walker (even if its only this year) and things get better.

FFS, stop being the whinging, immature, uneducated, stereo-typical Crows supporters that everyone talks about and start backing your footy team ! Its frustrating at the moment, i know but things will turn - the club has too many good people involved to not turn things around.[/quote]

Every team has injuries and and any educated footy fan knows that to blame injuries is the number 1 cop out! All injuries do is uncover a lack of depth and possibly a problem with the work load or preparation of players.

As for the recruiting of Dangerfield, has shown glimpses that he will be a good player but hasn't exactly set the comp alight. Will be a good player eventually, but where is the next Thompson or Johncock to help him out? Sloane is probably the hardest we have but he just has a crack and is unlikely to ever worry opposition teams.

And anyone that can't see that there are problems with that list and think things will miraculously turn for the better with the inclusion of McKay and Davis are immature and uneducated in the football basics.
Jimmy Ricard
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:19 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Henley

Re: Sack Craig

Postby bulldogs » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:10 am

Felch wrote:
tiger07andbeyond wrote:
bulldogs wrote:, Craig needs to waken up and the best thing for these players is for him to walk.


=D> =D>

How long is it going to take?

How long do we put up with these soft performances?

How long do we keep going until breaking point?

When is breaking point?

If we beat Brisbane and the Gold Coast will the great NC think he is on the right track?

Someone tell him FFS


Not sure how much footy you have played or coached mate, but if a there are continuous soft performances, then the players in question usually are to blame. If i wasnt prepared to keep my head over the footy when i played, i couldnt blame the coach !


its not only about the head over the ball , there soft in there work rate, soft in the mind to keep going there mentally soft and the coach can play a role in that. craig sprouted they are a exciting young squad well show me the excitment, these players are goin backwards and i am afraid the coach must take the blame
Last edited by bulldogs on Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
bulldogs
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Felch » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:13 am

They wont miraculously turn for the better, but they will get better. Its not rocket science, you put your better players back in, you generally play better footy.

BTW, the uneducated supporter comment wasnt directed at you JR, it was at some of the comments in general - i agree with some of your points.

Sloane will worry opposition sides though, he is the pick of the bunch.

Anyone involved with a footy club, at any level know that injuries can sabotage seasons - its not an excuse, it is a reason. Only very, very good sides can cover injuries and there are only a couple of them in the AFL at the moment.
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Sack Craig

Postby bulldogs » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:19 am

Felch wrote:They wont miraculously turn for the better, but they will get better. Its not rocket science, you put your better players back in, you generally play better footy.

BTW, the uneducated supporter comment wasnt directed at you JR, it was at some of the comments in general - i agree with some of your points.

Sloane will worry opposition sides though, he is the pick of the bunch.

Anyone involved with a footy club, at any level know that injuries can sabotage seasons - its not an excuse, it is a reason. Only very, very good sides can cover injuries and there are only a couple of them in the AFL at the moment.

no doubt felch, a full squad of players and the crows team is far better but that aint goin to happen. who in the side or squad has improved in the last 2 yrs.
bulldogs
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Felch » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:23 am

bulldogs wrote:
Felch wrote:
tiger07andbeyond wrote:
bulldogs wrote:, Craig needs to waken up and the best thing for these players is for him to walk.


=D> =D>

How long is it going to take?

How long do we put up with these soft performances?

How long do we keep going until breaking point?

When is breaking point?

If we beat Brisbane and the Gold Coast will the great NC think he is on the right track?

Someone tell him FFS


Not sure how much footy you have played or coached mate, but if a there are continuous soft performances, then the players in question usually are to blame. If i wasnt prepared to keep my head over the footy when i played, i couldnt blame the coach !


its not only about the head over the ball , there soft in there work rate, soft in the mind to keep going there mentally soft and the coach can play a role in that. craig sprouted they are a eciting young squad well show me the excitment, these players are goin backwards and i am afraid the coach must take the blame


Yeah, i agree with some of that. Craig never should have spruked like he did in hindsight. But guys are saying on here that he accepts mediocrity, but i would argue that by spruking like he did, he set the bar very, very high - maybe too high. Is that a sackable offence ? We, as Crows supporters, have extremely high standards and expectations - we have been very lucky, supporting a club who has been around the mark for a long time. The system is set up for clubs to have peaks and troughs, and we bucked that system for a long time. The bloke we have coaching now deserves some credit for that.
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Felch » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:28 am

bulldogs wrote:
Felch wrote:They wont miraculously turn for the better, but they will get better. Its not rocket science, you put your better players back in, you generally play better footy.

BTW, the uneducated supporter comment wasnt directed at you JR, it was at some of the comments in general - i agree with some of your points.

Sloane will worry opposition sides though, he is the pick of the bunch.

Anyone involved with a footy club, at any level know that injuries can sabotage seasons - its not an excuse, it is a reason. Only very, very good sides can cover injuries and there are only a couple of them in the AFL at the moment.

no doubt felch, a full squad of players and the crows team is far better but that aint goin to happen. who in the side or squad has improved in the last 2 yrs.


Dangerfield, Sloane, Tippett, McKernan, Jaensch, Scott Thompson, Walker, Petrenko, Douglas, Davis are all better than they were 2 years ago. And a couple of others like Otten and Martin have been set back by injury.
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Sack Craig

Postby bulldogs » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:31 am

thats right felch thats what made the crows such a good unit in his and ayres rein, they have lost that. Caig has done some good things and yes he should take some credit for that trait he implied but now is time to go
bulldogs
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby tiger07andbeyond » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:34 am

bulldogs wrote: yes he should take some credit for that trait he implied but now is time to go


He should take some credit but should also know when to walk
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.

tiger07andbeyond
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:12 pm
Location: Holden Hill
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Greenacres

Re: Sack Craig

Postby bulldogs » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:37 am

Felch wrote:
bulldogs wrote:
Felch wrote:They wont miraculously turn for the better, but they will get better. Its not rocket science, you put your better players back in, you generally play better footy.

BTW, the uneducated supporter comment wasnt directed at you JR, it was at some of the comments in general - i agree with some of your points.

Sloane will worry opposition sides though, he is the pick of the bunch.

Anyone involved with a footy club, at any level know that injuries can sabotage seasons - its not an excuse, it is a reason. Only very, very good sides can cover injuries and there are only a couple of them in the AFL at the moment.

no doubt felch, a full squad of players and the crows team is far better but that aint goin to happen. who in the side or squad has improved in the last 2 yrs.


Dangerfield, Sloane, Tippett, McKernan, Jaensch, Scott Thompson, Walker, Petrenko, Douglas, Davis are all better than they were 2 years ago. And a couple of others like Otten and Martin have been set back by injury.

yes i would agree on most, Petrenko not up to it and walker well he should be better same with Dangerfield, mckernan dont do enough/ tippett well lets bomb the ball on his head with 3 players jumpn on his back,Jaensch just, davis well his injury hurt,sloane good and thompson has stepped up. But really who is going fwd this year certainly not many out of those names
bulldogs
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Hondo » Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:03 pm

Dangerfield was hardly "overlooked" by the other clubs ! :o

In that draft the experts had him expected to go at around pick 13 or 14 and we got him at around pick 12.

I know this is a tough year but I think this is our most inexperienced team on the field for possibly ever in our history thanks to retirements and injuries. While it's a tough year for Craigy I don't think every single thing that is going wrong ON the field is his fault and that there is some alternative guru coach out there that can magically add 3 years' experience to our first and second year players.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Mad Mat » Sat Jun 18, 2011 10:53 pm

I pledge to only point out the positives for the remainder of the year.

Positive/s from the game:
1. Andy Otten
User avatar
Mad Mat
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:29 am
Location: SA - this year
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Farmy » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:06 pm

If Craig honestly thinks that what the Crows dished up in the first quarter against the Bulldogs was actually good, then he has clearly lost it.
Farmy
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:50 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Felch » Sun Jun 19, 2011 10:32 pm

Farmy wrote:If Craig honestly thinks that what the Crows dished up in the first quarter against the Bulldogs was actually good, then he has clearly lost it.


Weren't they leading ??? :?

Im taking that as good...
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Felch » Sun Jun 19, 2011 10:36 pm

Hondo wrote:Dangerfield was hardly "overlooked" by the other clubs ! :o

In that draft the experts had him expected to go at around pick 13 or 14 and we got him at around pick 12.

I know this is a tough year but I think this is our most inexperienced team on the field for possibly ever in our history thanks to retirements and injuries. While it's a tough year for Craigy I don't think every single thing that is going wrong ON the field is his fault and that there is some alternative guru coach out there that can magically add 3 years' experience to our first and second year players.


If he hadnt of made everyone aware of his intention to stay and finish his schooling regardless, then he would have gone earlier. Surely you arent forgeting all the hoo-haa about us picking him up, instead of Ebert or any other South Aussie kid ? I think we need to give the AFC recruiting staff some credit for sticking to their guns.
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Sack Craig

Postby bloods08 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:11 pm

Farmy wrote:If Craig honestly thinks that what the Crows dished up in the first quarter against the Bulldogs was actually good, then he has clearly lost it.


I think you may have lost it. 4 goals up iirc.
Go you Redbacks!
User avatar
bloods08
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4818
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: right here
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Hondo » Mon Jun 20, 2011 3:20 pm

Felch wrote:If he hadnt of made everyone aware of his intention to stay and finish his schooling regardless, then he would have gone earlier. Surely you arent forgeting all the hoo-haa about us picking him up, instead of Ebert or any other South Aussie kid ? I think we need to give the AFC recruiting staff some credit for sticking to their guns.


There's also other lads on the list that for whom we haven't yet seen their true capabilities from the recent drafts. Talia among others. As supporters I think we either swallow our own heads in anger at the injustice of it all and the incompetence of our coaches or we have some patience and ride it out. Regardless of whether NC walks there are some really good kids on our list to be developed by someone.

We were already a young team and then we lost Porps, Vince was injured, Stevens injured, Otten out for 9 weeks, etc, etc. Excuses? To some extent but they are also reasons why we have had an inconsistent performance level.

Mark Harvey had that shocking year in 2009 I think it was when all he did was play kids. Now look at them. I still back them our lads in. Remember it's NC's "fault" that we expect to make finals every year.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Farmy » Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:39 pm

bloods08 wrote:
Farmy wrote:If Craig honestly thinks that what the Crows dished up in the first quarter against the Bulldogs was actually good, then he has clearly lost it.


I think you may have lost it. 4 goals up iirc.


No the Crows lost it, the game that is.

Honestly if anyone let alone the coach thinks that quarter was something to be proud of, well its clear they are lying or they know nothing about football.

A quarter of soft football with cheap and easy goals against a shit side, who then worked the Crows out, applied a little pressure and the Crows went to water.

Get back to me when the Crows are 4 goals up in spite of desperate intense pressure, not with a complete absence of it like the first quarter last night.

Oh wait, hang on. That has not happened once this year, and it won't happen while Neil "Finals losing uncontested football" Craig is in charge. And the Collingwood game doesn't count, Collingwood were not on, as evidenced by the fact they switched it on and smashed the pathetic Crows by 60 points in half a quarter.
Farmy
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:50 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Footy Smart » Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:40 am

Farmy wrote:
bloods08 wrote:
Farmy wrote:If Craig honestly thinks that what the Crows dished up in the first quarter against the Bulldogs was actually good, then he has clearly lost it.


I think you may have lost it. 4 goals up iirc.


No the Crows lost it, the game that is.

Honestly if anyone let alone the coach thinks that quarter was something to be proud of, well its clear they are lying or they know nothing about football.

A quarter of soft football with cheap and easy goals against a **** side, who then worked the Crows out, applied a little pressure and the Crows went to water.

Get back to me when the Crows are 4 goals up in spite of desperate intense pressure, not with a complete absence of it like the first quarter last night.

Oh wait, hang on. That has not happened once this year, and it won't happen while Neil "Finals losing uncontested football" Craig is in charge. And the Collingwood game doesn't count, Collingwood were not on, as evidenced by the fact they switched it on and smashed the pathetic Crows by 60 points in half a quarter.


:lol: You are an imbecile Farmy, a ****** of the highest order. You are so anti-NC that you will never give the 'players' any credit. You will always find a factor that minimises their effort. If you think the boys are going out there and not trying you are as you put it "lying or no nothing about football". The players are preparing themselves as best they can and while things aren’t working they are trying that you cant take away from them. You can only play against the team that is out there.

You are a supporter that AFC doesn’t want or need. So do the rest of the AFC supporter base a favour and **** the hell off because you are giving us a bad name and the rest of the crow hating/bashing supporters out there love it and it does no good what so ever.
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:16 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 118 times
Grassroots Team: Modbury

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |