Page 3 of 116

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 7:59 am
by Ruben Carter
And so often the little brother is more successful...

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:32 am
by stan
Ruben Carter wrote:And so often the little brother is more successful...


No hes not. ;-)

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:35 pm
by Fricky
Psyber wrote:Is this the Crows claim to a history? http://www.afc.com.au/news/2014-01-20/p ... entury-afc
I guess it is about as valid as the Power and the Magpies both claiming the 1870 link... ;)


This is so pathetic by the club ](*,) Its small minded crap like this that's makes the whole league laugh at us. I don't know if the current AFC is trying to associate itself with the 19th Century AFC, but it just reeks of desperation. Especially when they put this in the article
Part two of a three-part series about the original Adelaide Football Club, formed in 1860. A major development in SA football occurred a decade after Adelaide became the State’s first club. The Port Adelaide Football Club was formed in 1870

Grow up FFS. Who cares who has been around longer. I care about what the team does on the field and (after the Tippett/Trigg crap) that the club admins don't stuff the club up off field.

Just get on with playing footy instead of participating in this childish garbage.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:55 pm
by bennymacca
Suri wrote:
Psyber wrote:Is this the Crows claim to a history? http://www.afc.com.au/news/2014-01-20/p ... entury-afc
I guess it is about as valid as the Power and the Magpies both claiming the 1870 link... ;)


This is so pathetic by the club ](*,) Its small minded crap like this that's makes the whole league laugh at us. I don't know if the current AFC is trying to associate itself with the 19th Century AFC, but it just reeks of desperation. Especially when they put this in the article
Part two of a three-part series about the original Adelaide Football Club, formed in 1860. A major development in SA football occurred a decade after Adelaide became the State’s first club. The Port Adelaide Football Club was formed in 1870

Grow up FFS. Who cares who has been around longer. I care about what the team does on the field and (after the Tippett/Trigg crap) that the club admins don't stuff the club up off field.

Just get on with playing footy instead of participating in this childish garbage.


massive crows fan, and wholeheartedly agree with all of this. we have no connection whatsoever to the old adelaide football club.

and for the record, both port power and the SANFL team can claim the pre 1997 sanfl history, i really dont see the fuss about that either.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 7:55 am
by stan
Suri wrote:
Psyber wrote:Is this the Crows claim to a history? http://www.afc.com.au/news/2014-01-20/p ... entury-afc
I guess it is about as valid as the Power and the Magpies both claiming the 1870 link... ;)


This is so pathetic by the club ](*,) Its small minded crap like this that's makes the whole league laugh at us. I don't know if the current AFC is trying to associate itself with the 19th Century AFC, but it just reeks of desperation. Especially when they put this in the article
Part two of a three-part series about the original Adelaide Football Club, formed in 1860. A major development in SA football occurred a decade after Adelaide became the State’s first club. The Port Adelaide Football Club was formed in 1870

Grow up FFS. Who cares who has been around longer. I care about what the team does on the field and (after the Tippett/Trigg crap) that the club admins don't stuff the club up off field.

Just get on with playing footy instead of participating in this childish garbage.


Fair point buy really the club has learnt nothing. Trigg still on board makes that very clear.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:38 pm
by Rik E Boy
LMFAO. 1859 FTW.

regards,

REB

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:41 pm
by heater31
Suri wrote:
Psyber wrote:Is this the Crows claim to a history? http://www.afc.com.au/news/2014-01-20/p ... entury-afc
I guess it is about as valid as the Power and the Magpies both claiming the 1870 link... ;)


This is so pathetic by the club ](*,) Its small minded crap like this that's makes the whole league laugh at us. I don't know if the current AFC is trying to associate itself with the 19th Century AFC, but it just reeks of desperation. Especially when they put this in the article
Part two of a three-part series about the original Adelaide Football Club, formed in 1860. A major development in SA football occurred a decade after Adelaide became the State’s first club. The Port Adelaide Football Club was formed in 1870

Grow up FFS. Who cares who has been around longer. I care about what the team does on the field and (after the Tippett/Trigg crap) that the club admins don't stuff the club up off field.

Just get on with playing footy instead of participating in this childish garbage.



Shit like this is why I no longer identify myself as an AFC follower.

Sturt first, then the Gold Coast for the AFL.....

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:43 pm
by Rik E Boy
Ablett help you all when Booney lobs....

regards,

REB

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:18 pm
by Booney
Rik E Boy wrote:Ablett help you all when Booney lobs....

regards,

REB


Goes a long way to explaining why half of the Ad-el-aide *clap clap clap* Ad-el-aide *clap clap clap* brigade look as weathered as they do.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 3:04 pm
by Wedgie
stan wrote:
Ruben Carter wrote:And so often the little brother is more successful...


No hes not. ;-)

Darren Jarman says Hi. ;)

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:07 pm
by stan
Wedgie wrote:
stan wrote:
Ruben Carter wrote:And so often the little brother is more successful...


No hes not. ;-)

Darren Jarman says Hi. ;)


Thought Darren was older?

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:10 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
Wedgie wrote:
stan wrote:
Ruben Carter wrote:And so often the little brother is more successful...


No hes not. ;-)

Darren Jarman says Hi. ;)


Nathan says hello also.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:28 pm
by Squids
Shaun McKernan.......

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:32 pm
by Mr Beefy
Gazza Snr

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:33 pm
by Ruben Carter
Travis Cloke Wayne Carey Shaun Burgoyne...

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 6:47 am
by Wedgie
stan wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
stan wrote:
Ruben Carter wrote:And so often the little brother is more successful...


No hes not. ;-)

Darren Jarman says Hi. ;)


Thought Darren was older?

Nup

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:16 am
by stan
Squids wrote:Shaun McKernan.......


Lol that will hurt...

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:56 am
by tigerhutch
Tony snr

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:37 pm
by scoob
Mark Waugh

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:28 pm
by Rik E Boy
scoob wrote:Mark Waugh


Dean Waugh. :)

regards,

REB