That's not a bad policy assuming the player's club is in the know at stage one and involved of the warning and support programme process. I think one warning with no secrecy from the club is reasonable.the joker wrote:..The NRL imposes a suspended fine of five per cent of a player's salary for a first offence. There is an official written employment warning and three months' compulsory attendance at counselling. The player is suspended for 12 weeks for a second positive test and the first fine is payable
That way the first timer gets a chance to straighten out with full support from all involved parties, but those that don't want to change get a substantial negative reinforcement the second time.
I assume a third time would mean out for keeps.