AFL drugs charge

Talk on the national game

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby fish » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Would an AFL ban cover other leagues such as SANFL, VFL etc?
User avatar
fish
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:28 pm
Has liked: 190 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".


ROFLMAO :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Yep, good mate that is.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby dedja » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:45 pm

Booney wrote:I think he should be in more trouble for trafficking that bloody moustache.


Mistaken identity perhaps?

Image
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23340
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 663 times
Been liked: 1546 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:51 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".


ROFLMAO :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Yep, good mate that is.


Don't you have choir practice? You can put ya head back in the sand and pretend drugs aren't everywhere. If all the footballers that had taken illicit drugs were banned for life, you would have to lace up the boots for Hawthorn.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby fish » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:53 pm

dedja wrote:
Booney wrote:I think he should be in more trouble for trafficking that bloody moustache.


Mistaken identity perhaps?

Image

:lol: :lol:
User avatar
fish
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:28 pm
Has liked: 190 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:07 pm

He may get delisted and his career may be in jeopardy, but I still feel sorry for the poor bugger. Coke is no worse than an ecky and if the afl found out about all of the players that took ecky's, there wouldn't be many players left running around.
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Bum Crack
Coach
 
Posts: 7943
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Here
Has liked: 325 times
Been liked: 909 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:08 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".


ROFLMAO :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Yep, good mate that is.


Don't you have choir practice? You can put ya head back in the sand and pretend drugs aren't everywhere. If all the footballers that had taken illicit drugs were banned for life, you would have to lace up the boots for Hawthorn.


I think you would just wind up the AFL and every other league of every other code
User avatar
Mr Beefy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5128
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:18 pm
Has liked: 411 times
Been liked: 676 times
Grassroots Team: Rosewater

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:11 pm

Mr Beefy wrote:
I think you would just wind up the AFL and every other league of every other code


Yes but some live with the fairies and think it doesn't happen. The youth of today are taking lots of drugs, and it ain't pot.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby dedja » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:12 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
I think you would just wind up the AFL and every other league of every other code


Yes but some live with the fairies and think it doesn't happen. The youth of today are taking lots of drugs, and it ain't pot.


I wouldn't restrict the demographics ... ;)
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23340
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 663 times
Been liked: 1546 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:13 pm

SJABC wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Interesting that some Cats supporters are seemingly brushing this aside and suggesting this isn't that bad yet when other high profile players from other clubs are not charged with any offence or have been proven to have done anything wrong they jump all over it like a dog with a bone :roll: :roll:

Wedgie i am not referring to you for what it's worth.



=D> =D> =D> =D>


If he's guilty, he'll go and rightly so.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:14 pm

Bum Crack wrote:He may get delisted and his career may be in jeopardy, but I still feel sorry for the poor bugger. Coke is no worse than an ecky and if the afl found out about all of the players that took ecky's, there wouldn't be many players left running around.


Um, no it's a bit more serious than that.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:19 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:
Bum Crack wrote:He may get delisted and his career may be in jeopardy, but I still feel sorry for the poor bugger. Coke is no worse than an ecky and if the afl found out about all of the players that took ecky's, there wouldn't be many players left running around.


Um, no it's a bit more serious than that.

regards,

REB

If it is, he deserves to go, but things are often made out to be a lot worse than they actually are a lot of the time. If he was organising some coke for some mates, he is silly, yes. Not enough to get the arse for though. I know a lot of people can't relate to that, but it night be time to get your head out of the sand. It is going on everywhere,
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Bum Crack
Coach
 
Posts: 7943
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Here
Has liked: 325 times
Been liked: 909 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:24 pm

My head isn't in the sand cracker but perhaps yours is. Some of your comments tend to suggest that Coke and Ekky use is a bit of harmless fun. This has little to do with my understanding that yes, the issue is obviously more prevelant than is publicly known *injunction cough*.

I have lost a mate and nearly lost a relative to drug use, hardly harmless fun in my book. I'm pretty disappointed in Matty Stokes at the moment. To me it's a worry that he has already been charged.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:30 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:My head isn't in the sand cracker but perhaps yours is. Some of your comments tend to suggest that Coke and Ekky use is a bit of harmless fun. This has little to do with my understanding that yes, the issue is obviously more prevelant than is publicly known *injunction cough*.

I have lost a mate and nearly lost a relative to drug use, hardly harmless fun in my book. I'm pretty disappointed in Matty Stokes at the moment. To me it's a worry that he has already been charged.

regards,

REB

It's not harmless fun at all. I'm just saying it is more prevelant than some here realise. I can guarantee you, that if the AFL had a no strike rule on positive drug use, there would be a hell of a lot of good AFL players playing country football.
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Bum Crack
Coach
 
Posts: 7943
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Here
Has liked: 325 times
Been liked: 909 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:33 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".


ROFLMAO :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Yep, good mate that is.


Don't you have choir practice? You can put ya head back in the sand and pretend drugs aren't everywhere. If all the footballers that had taken illicit drugs were banned for life, you would have to lace up the boots for Hawthorn.


So suggesting that a person helping another person to obtain and either consume or distribute illicit drugs makes me a choirboy :? FFS It's a strange world.

Feel free to list all the drug offences that Hawthorn players have been charged with if that makes you feel better. Oh that's right, that's all heresay and conjecture. Not suggesting for one second that Hawthorn or any club is completely clean of these sort of things but after all the crap that has come Hawthorn's way from Geelong supporters it's interesting to see the reaction to this to say the least.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:37 pm

Hahaha. Disgruntled Hawks supporter. If he is guilty, he will go. I'm just saying a lot of you don't realise how prevelant it is.
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Bum Crack
Coach
 
Posts: 7943
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Here
Has liked: 325 times
Been liked: 909 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:39 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:My head isn't in the sand cracker but perhaps yours is. Some of your comments tend to suggest that Coke and Ekky use is a bit of harmless fun. This has little to do with my understanding that yes, the issue is obviously more prevelant than is publicly known *injunction cough*.

I have lost a mate and nearly lost a relative to drug use, hardly harmless fun in my book. I'm pretty disappointed in Matty Stokes at the moment. To me it's a worry that he has already been charged.

regards,

REB

And I didn't suggest it was harmless fun. Before you post my first comment, look at my response where I said I was being sarcastic.
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Bum Crack
Coach
 
Posts: 7943
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Here
Has liked: 325 times
Been liked: 909 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby dedja » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:47 pm

Bum Crack wrote: I'm just saying a lot of you don't realise how prevelant it is.


True, we're all old farts who have no idea what people get up to these days ... :roll:

Mate, it doesn't matter how prevalent it is ... I'm not sure how that's relevant to whatever penalty the man should incur if he has a case to answer.

Based on your logic, we should let everyone off who speeds because there's lots out there who do it but don't get caught.

So if he is guilty of a crime, he has to do the time. Pretty simple equation really.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23340
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 663 times
Been liked: 1546 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Bum Crack wrote:Hahaha. Disgruntled Hawks supporter. If he is guilty, he will go. I'm just saying a lot of you don't realise how prevelant it is.


Hmmm, care to list the drug offences any Hawthorn players have been involved in? Prevelant or not your mob are quick to jump on others when there are no facts to support the accusations but get very defensive when a player from Geelong is actually charged by the police.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: AFL drugs charge

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:08 am

rod_rooster wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".


ROFLMAO :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Yep, good mate that is.


Don't you have choir practice? You can put ya head back in the sand and pretend drugs aren't everywhere. If all the footballers that had taken illicit drugs were banned for life, you would have to lace up the boots for Hawthorn.


So suggesting that a person helping another person to obtain and either consume or distribute illicit drugs makes me a choirboy :? FFS It's a strange world.

Feel free to list all the drug offences that Hawthorn players have been charged with if that makes you feel better. Oh that's right, that's all heresay and conjecture. Not suggesting for one second that Hawthorn or any club is completely clean of these sort of things but after all the crap that has come Hawthorn's way from Geelong supporters it's interesting to see the reaction to this to say the least.


Getting a bit defensive there rod. I mentioned Hawthorn 'cause you are a Hawthorn supporter. Maybe read the sentence again. ALL FOOTBALLERS.

And If I was going to obtain drugs, I would obtain them through someone I could trust. Much safer. I'm sure Stokes wasn't pushing drugs on his mate. His mate would of got the drugs from somewhere anyway.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |