by fish » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:29 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".
by dedja » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:45 pm
Booney wrote:I think he should be in more trouble for trafficking that bloody moustache.
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:51 pm
rod_rooster wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".
ROFLMAO![]()
![]()
![]()
Yep, good mate that is.
by fish » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:53 pm
dedja wrote:Booney wrote:I think he should be in more trouble for trafficking that bloody moustache.
Mistaken identity perhaps?
by Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:07 pm
by Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:08 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:rod_rooster wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".
ROFLMAO![]()
![]()
![]()
Yep, good mate that is.
Don't you have choir practice? You can put ya head back in the sand and pretend drugs aren't everywhere. If all the footballers that had taken illicit drugs were banned for life, you would have to lace up the boots for Hawthorn.
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:11 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:
I think you would just wind up the AFL and every other league of every other code
by dedja » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:12 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:
I think you would just wind up the AFL and every other league of every other code
Yes but some live with the fairies and think it doesn't happen. The youth of today are taking lots of drugs, and it ain't pot.
by Rik E Boy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:13 pm
SJABC wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Interesting that some Cats supporters are seemingly brushing this aside and suggesting this isn't that bad yet when other high profile players from other clubs are not charged with any offence or have been proven to have done anything wrong they jump all over it like a dog with a bone![]()
Wedgie i am not referring to you for what it's worth.
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Rik E Boy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:14 pm
Bum Crack wrote:He may get delisted and his career may be in jeopardy, but I still feel sorry for the poor bugger. Coke is no worse than an ecky and if the afl found out about all of the players that took ecky's, there wouldn't be many players left running around.
by Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:19 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Bum Crack wrote:He may get delisted and his career may be in jeopardy, but I still feel sorry for the poor bugger. Coke is no worse than an ecky and if the afl found out about all of the players that took ecky's, there wouldn't be many players left running around.
Um, no it's a bit more serious than that.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:24 pm
by Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:30 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:My head isn't in the sand cracker but perhaps yours is. Some of your comments tend to suggest that Coke and Ekky use is a bit of harmless fun. This has little to do with my understanding that yes, the issue is obviously more prevelant than is publicly known *injunction cough*.
I have lost a mate and nearly lost a relative to drug use, hardly harmless fun in my book. I'm pretty disappointed in Matty Stokes at the moment. To me it's a worry that he has already been charged.
regards,
REB
by rod_rooster » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:33 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:rod_rooster wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".
ROFLMAO![]()
![]()
![]()
Yep, good mate that is.
Don't you have choir practice? You can put ya head back in the sand and pretend drugs aren't everywhere. If all the footballers that had taken illicit drugs were banned for life, you would have to lace up the boots for Hawthorn.
by Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:37 pm
by Bum Crack » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:39 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:My head isn't in the sand cracker but perhaps yours is. Some of your comments tend to suggest that Coke and Ekky use is a bit of harmless fun. This has little to do with my understanding that yes, the issue is obviously more prevelant than is publicly known *injunction cough*.
I have lost a mate and nearly lost a relative to drug use, hardly harmless fun in my book. I'm pretty disappointed in Matty Stokes at the moment. To me it's a worry that he has already been charged.
regards,
REB
by dedja » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:47 pm
Bum Crack wrote: I'm just saying a lot of you don't realise how prevelant it is.
by rod_rooster » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm
Bum Crack wrote:Hahaha. Disgruntled Hawks supporter. If he is guilty, he will go. I'm just saying a lot of you don't realise how prevelant it is.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:08 am
rod_rooster wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:rod_rooster wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sounds to me like he was just being a "good mate".
ROFLMAO![]()
![]()
![]()
Yep, good mate that is.
Don't you have choir practice? You can put ya head back in the sand and pretend drugs aren't everywhere. If all the footballers that had taken illicit drugs were banned for life, you would have to lace up the boots for Hawthorn.
So suggesting that a person helping another person to obtain and either consume or distribute illicit drugs makes me a choirboyFFS It's a strange world.
Feel free to list all the drug offences that Hawthorn players have been charged with if that makes you feel better. Oh that's right, that's all heresay and conjecture. Not suggesting for one second that Hawthorn or any club is completely clean of these sort of things but after all the crap that has come Hawthorn's way from Geelong supporters it's interesting to see the reaction to this to say the least.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |