by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:07 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:24 pm
sapaul wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Is it.
To lead a top 8 side by 6 goals at half time, to push Collingwood for 3 quarters and beat Sydney last start....work it out.
by sapaul » Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:32 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:35 pm
Reddeer wrote:Why are we so good for one half and go to water under the pressure of a challenge.
Are they trained as sprinters and not as stayers.
Trained as thoroughbreds and not as mallee bulls.
The talent is there.
by Gingernuts » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:04 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Reddeer wrote:Why are we so good for one half and go to water under the pressure of a challenge.
Are they trained as sprinters and not as stayers.
Trained as thoroughbreds and not as mallee bulls.
The talent is there.
Nah .. just trained by Neil Craig. As a supporter of another club, they can keep Craig as coach for as long as they like, because he is clearly not the man to be leading this group. He is not inspiring them to play winning footy, and I cannot understand how a board of an AFL club can just leave it up to a coach to decide when he wants to give it away. Couldn't imagine Collingwood doing that. They're about to replace Malthouse who may coach them to back-to-back flags. Craig's had his day, time for a new voice to be heard around the club.
by Sky Pilot » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:41 pm
Jim05 wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Yes, you should've. However you fell over the line against a team who has won only 4 games for the year. Grounds for concern IMO.
We won at a ground we have been pathetic at for years, not concerned at all. Would have won by 10 goal if it was at ethihad. Glad we finally won at that crap hole
by Gingernuts » Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:46 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:Jim05 wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Yes, you should've. However you fell over the line against a team who has won only 4 games for the year. Grounds for concern IMO.
We won at a ground we have been pathetic at for years, not concerned at all. Would have won by 10 goal if it was at ethihad. Glad we finally won at that crap hole
Good post Jim
by Voice » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:26 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Reddeer wrote:Why are we so good for one half and go to water under the pressure of a challenge.
Are they trained as sprinters and not as stayers.
Trained as thoroughbreds and not as mallee bulls.
The talent is there.
Nah .. just trained by Neil Craig. As a supporter of another club, they can keep Craig as coach for as long as they like, because he is clearly not the man to be leading this group. He is not inspiring them to play winning footy, and I cannot understand how a board of an AFL club can just leave it up to a coach to decide when he wants to give it away. Couldn't imagine Collingwood doing that. They're about to replace Malthouse who may coach them to back-to-back flags. Craig's had his day, time for a new voice to be heard around the club.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jul 17, 2011 12:53 am
sapaul wrote:The comment from Reddeer was about having talent, not being a great side.
by sapaul » Sun Jul 17, 2011 12:59 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Is there any talent there? I don't think so.
by Gingernuts » Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:11 am
sapaul wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Is there any talent there? I don't think so.
Do you practice at being a dipshit or does it come naturally?
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:05 am
by stan » Sun Jul 17, 2011 9:21 am
sapaul wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Is there any talent there? I don't think so.
Do you practice at being a dipshit or does it come naturally?
by Media Park » Sun Jul 17, 2011 9:56 am
sapaul wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Is there any talent there? I don't think so.
Do you practice at being a dipshit or does it come naturally?
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by MW » Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:03 am
by Sojourner » Sun Jul 17, 2011 12:03 pm
Gingernuts wrote:One thing is for sure - putting a rookie coach in charge of a rookie team is a recipe for disaster. Unless a coach in the vein of Malthouse or perhaps Clarkson is available, then personally I would stick with Craig for another season at least.
by Psyber » Sun Jul 17, 2011 12:30 pm
I think that is the core issue.Reddeer wrote:Why are we so good for one half and go to water under the pressure of a challenge.
Are they trained as sprinters and not as stayers.
Trained as thoroughbreds and not as mallee bulls.
The talent is there.
by stan » Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:46 pm
Psyber wrote:I think that is the core issue.Reddeer wrote:Why are we so good for one half and go to water under the pressure of a challenge.
Are they trained as sprinters and not as stayers.
Trained as thoroughbreds and not as mallee bulls.
The talent is there.
That and the fact that the game plan that depends entirely on being fitter than the opposition worked some years ago when it was new, but doesn't now that the opposition have upped their fitness standards too - with more focus on staying power perhaps.
by redden whites » Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:25 pm
redden whites wrote:Absolute leaderless rabble.
by stan » Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:03 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |