daysofourlives wrote:stan wrote:daysofourlives wrote:I guess well have to wait for Stan to clear it up, English isnt a strong point of this site, i personally dont like using apostrophes. Context of the previous quotes tells me Stan is not suggesting anything sinister, just agreeing
Ok well there is no hidden meaning. Brad Crouch most likely has a niggle really and I agreed that they also chose not to risk him on the Etihad deck. Similar to how Port didn't risk Polec on the deck.
Just my opinion and nothing else implied. Would probably play this week unless they go with an unchanged side that touched up Richmond.
Oh so i was right, again!! Apology accepted MW
Gets a bit awkward now when the crows come out and say hes out for anotjer 2 - 3. Lol