by woodublieve12 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:20 pm
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:22 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:36 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:I am not terribly fussed that Schulz got off either, maybe you should think back to when Gray was tackled... Fair few tears from port supporters than but I question the issue with the rule and I am one eyed. Rightio
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:37 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Did Gray come back on? Did Richards?
by Jim05 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:38 pm
saintal wrote:Essendon's Baguley copping a week for striking Lonie is rubbish. Nothing more than a hit to the upper arm/chest.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:43 pm
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:43 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:I am not terribly fussed that Schulz got off either, maybe you should think back to when Gray was tackled... Fair few tears from port supporters than but I question the issue with the rule and I am one eyed. Rightio
I think neither should have got games but the Gibbs tackle looked a hell of a lot worse than the Schulz one, you can't untackle someone while you are both falling to the ground sideways.
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:44 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:I reckon Broadbent should've got a game for being a dickhead.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:45 pm
Jim05 wrote:saintal wrote:Essendon's Baguley copping a week for striking Lonie is rubbish. Nothing more than a hit to the upper arm/chest.
Bags contesting it tonight. Risks getting 2 for it
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:46 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I reckon Broadbent should've got a game for being a dickhead.
We finally agree on something
by MW » Tue Jul 07, 2015 4:22 pm
Jim05 wrote:saintal wrote:Essendon's Baguley copping a week for striking Lonie is rubbish. Nothing more than a hit to the upper arm/chest.
Bags contesting it tonight. Risks getting 2 for it
by stan » Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:16 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:I reckon Broadbent should've got a game for being a dickhead.
by daysofourlives » Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:04 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Not at all LM... Just want consistency with the MRP! The fact players are getting games for a tackling is a disgrace. The double movement argument is a joke...
by RustyCage » Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:48 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:I reckon Broadbent should've got a game for being a dickhead.
by daysofourlives » Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:59 pm
RustyCage wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I reckon Broadbent should've got a game for being a dickhead.
Yep, was a bit of a dog act
by daysofourlives » Tue Jul 07, 2015 8:16 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 8:35 pm
daysofourlives wrote:So it seems Watson was injured against the Hawks the week before.
Does anyone else get the feeling that either Essendon or himself wanted to get him or himself to 200 games last weekend knowing that it may be his last game if the players get 2 years from WADA?
by Jim05 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 8:47 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Jim05 wrote:saintal wrote:Essendon's Baguley copping a week for striking Lonie is rubbish. Nothing more than a hit to the upper arm/chest.
Bags contesting it tonight. Risks getting 2 for it
Should get off.
by saintal » Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:27 pm
Jim05 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Jim05 wrote:saintal wrote:Essendon's Baguley copping a week for striking Lonie is rubbish. Nothing more than a hit to the upper arm/chest.
Bags contesting it tonight. Risks getting 2 for it
Should get off.
Baguley cleared.
Lonie basically accused of staging for the free by the tribunal
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:05 pm
daysofourlives wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Not at all LM... Just want consistency with the MRP! The fact players are getting games for a tackling is a disgrace. The double movement argument is a joke...
Start with Franklin getting what he deserved then if you want consistency
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |