by Tassie Blues » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:09 pm
by Pag » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:12 pm
by Dutchy » Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:12 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:34 pm
Dutchy wrote:Richmond have too many plodders and few stars, Cotchin is massively over rated
by Brad » Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:45 pm
by GWW » Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:24 am
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:57 am
Q. wrote:If Port beat us I'll have to disappear for the week.
by daysofourlives » Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:00 am
GWW wrote:Richmond appeared to lack leadership yesterday, no one stepped up when required.
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:09 am
daysofourlives wrote:GWW wrote:Richmond appeared to lack leadership yesterday, no one stepped up when required.
They also appear to be obsessed with not kicking it to Jack and making him play as a decoy. Which would be fine if it wasnt Vickery or Edwards that they then directed the ball through.
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:37 am
by Pag » Mon Sep 09, 2013 11:51 am
by David Brent » Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:27 pm
Dutchy wrote:Richmond have too many plodders and few stars, Cotchin is massively over rated
by Banker » Mon Sep 09, 2013 3:06 pm
by hearts on fire » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:18 pm
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:29 pm
by David Brent » Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:09 pm
Booney wrote:Chaplin, Pettard, Edwards, Maric, Houli, Grigg.
There are 6 blokes who were, at best, mid-range players in mid-range sides before joining Richmond. Now was the side mid-range because of the players, or were the players mentioned mid-range because of the teams they were in? Either way, there is half a dozen blokes who wont be in a team going deep into the finals anytime soon.
Perhaps Richmond thought their core group was better than it actually is and figured they only needed a few top-ups here and there.
It didn't / hasn't worked so far.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:10 pm
Booney wrote:Chaplin, Pettard, Edwards, Maric, Houli, Grigg.
There are 6 blokes who were, at best, mid-range players in mid-range sides before joining Richmond. Now was the side mid-range because of the players, or were the players mentioned mid-range because of the teams they were in? Either way, there is half a dozen blokes who wont be in a team going deep into the finals anytime soon.
Perhaps Richmond thought their core group was better than it actually is and figured they only needed a few top-ups here and there.
It didn't / hasn't worked so far.
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:39 pm
David Brent wrote:Booney wrote:Chaplin, Pettard, Edwards, Maric, Houli, Grigg.
There are 6 blokes who were, at best, mid-range players in mid-range sides before joining Richmond. Now was the side mid-range because of the players, or were the players mentioned mid-range because of the teams they were in? Either way, there is half a dozen blokes who wont be in a team going deep into the finals anytime soon.
Perhaps Richmond thought their core group was better than it actually is and figured they only needed a few top-ups here and there.
It didn't / hasn't worked so far.
Harsh on Houli & Maric both have improved a huge amount since joining the tigers.
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:45 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:19 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Serious question - can Port give Geelong a shake this Friday night?
Also must say i had a chuckle when Richmond lost, thinking back to Chaplin declaring he wanted to move on to play finals and now he gets to sit back and watch Port this Friday
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |