by Booney » Mon May 16, 2016 9:49 am
bennymacca wrote:Was talking about Dixon as well actually. And Ah so port actually expected to capitulate against any team that puts the slightest modicum of pressure on them. Gotcha.
by Booney » Mon May 16, 2016 9:51 am
bennymacca wrote:That article was a year ago too booney.
by Booney » Mon May 16, 2016 9:53 am
bennymacca wrote:Sounds like ken is trying to rewrite history there. They are still sitting surprisingly well for how they are travelling but everyone thought they would be doing better. Everyone.
So booney before you go calling people fools tell me what you expected from the power this year?
by MW » Mon May 16, 2016 9:55 am
by Booney » Mon May 16, 2016 9:57 am
MW wrote:Take a deep breath guys...
Crows were above expectations early in 2016 but have come back to the field with some weak midfield and defence performances of late. Think we will still be in the 8-12 range.
Port are below expectations for 2016 but given the injuries and suspensions and lack of depth now exposed, not too far off the mark I wouldn't have thought. Again, think they will finish 8-12 range.
Arguing about who is going better is a wasted exercise.
by bennymacca » Mon May 16, 2016 10:07 am
by Booney » Mon May 16, 2016 10:51 am
bennymacca wrote:Jesus boon has a sandy vagina lately.
You just said yourself that you didn't think they can challenge without Ryder.
Also who else are we supposed to do when we want to read about the afl. Not read the media?
Calling someone a fool because they think the media has more credibility than someone who sits in the outer is the height of arrogance.
by am Bays » Mon May 16, 2016 10:59 am
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:Jesus boon has a sandy vagina lately.
You just said yourself that you didn't think they can challenge without Ryder.
Also who else are we supposed to do when we want to read about the afl. Not read the media?
Calling someone a fool because they think the media has more credibility than someone who sits in the outer is the height of arrogance.
Sandy vagina? No, just saying it as I see it.
Read the media, for sure, I do, but when a ridiculous statement is made by the media don't attribute it to the club, as you did with your "missing puzzle piece" crap.
I stand as often as I sit, thank you.
by bennymacca » Mon May 16, 2016 11:09 am
by Booney » Mon May 16, 2016 11:13 am
bennymacca wrote:Not attributing it to the club at all. But you have to wonder whether they overestimated their list when they sell off all of their good draft picks to bring in Ryder and Dixon.
by bennymacca » Mon May 16, 2016 11:15 am
by Corona Man » Mon May 16, 2016 11:16 am
by Booney » Mon May 16, 2016 11:18 am
bennymacca wrote:So due to injuries and suspensions your list is now not good enough to beat Carlton?
Has to be more to it than that.
Reckon your midfield has all taken a step back and that's the real issue. How many of them can say they have even stayed the same as last year? Not too many.
Gray is about the only one that can hold his head high in that group.
by bennymacca » Mon May 16, 2016 11:19 am
by cracka » Mon May 16, 2016 11:24 am
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:So due to injuries and suspensions your list is now not good enough to beat Carlton?
Has to be more to it than that.
Reckon your midfield has all taken a step back and that's the real issue. How many of them can say they have even stayed the same as last year? Not too many.
Gray is about the only one that can hold his head high in that group.
Ryder, Monfries, Lobbe, Schulz, Gray and Carlile missing.
Two lead ruckman, full forward, full back, best on baller.
by bennymacca » Mon May 16, 2016 11:24 am
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:So due to injuries and suspensions your list is now not good enough to beat Carlton?
Has to be more to it than that.
Reckon your midfield has all taken a step back and that's the real issue. How many of them can say they have even stayed the same as last year? Not too many.
Gray is about the only one that can hold his head high in that group.
Ryder, Monfries, Lobbe, Schulz, Gray and Carlile missing.
Two lead ruckman, full forward, full back, best on baller.
by cracka » Mon May 16, 2016 11:29 am
by The Bedge » Mon May 16, 2016 11:31 am
bennymacca wrote:
Lobbe got dropped and Carlisle is average at best. Same with monfries. Good player but not a world beater.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by JK » Mon May 16, 2016 11:32 am
bennymacca wrote:Carlton don't have the talent this year.
On form so far this year the crows look easily the best out of those teams you mentioned.
If Melbourne can start getting consistent they could easily make it. But I reckon they are 1 year away.
Port look in terrible form but being 4-4 and not playing well has to be cause for optimism, as it is a good base for them to launch from. Last year they came from too far back.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |