RustyCage wrote:Two weeks for Masten
Disgraceful, they obviously only found him half guilty and half believed his fabricated story. He either bit him or he didnt. Way too lenient
by daysofourlives » Tue Aug 18, 2015 10:14 pm
RustyCage wrote:Two weeks for Masten
by helicopterking » Tue Aug 18, 2015 10:19 pm
daysofourlives wrote:helicopterking wrote:Masten found guilty.
AFL setting a dangerous precedent allowing players can accuse others of anything,without conclusive footage and they get punished.
lel
by Spargo » Tue Aug 18, 2015 10:27 pm
daysofourlives wrote:RustyCage wrote:Two weeks for Masten
Disgraceful, they obviously only found him half guilty and half believed his fabricated story. He either bit him or he didnt. Way too lenient
by Booney » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:22 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:36 am
RustyCage wrote:Two weeks for Masten
by stan » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:40 am
Booney wrote:Suban should get 1 week for forcing his arm into some poor unsuspecting blokes mouth.
by stan » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:41 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:46 am
stan wrote:Definitely surprised at the result for only 2 weeks. Seems very strange but what we all expecting? A reasonable and logical decision from the the tribunal? Come on guys.
by MJ_23 » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:50 am
by Spargo » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:55 am
MJ_23 wrote:Should have been 0, there was not enough evidence to give him weeks IMO.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:56 am
MJ_23 wrote:Should have been 0, there was not enough evidence to give him weeks IMO.
by Rik E Boy » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:40 pm
daysofourlives wrote:RustyCage wrote:Two weeks for Masten
Disgraceful, they obviously only found him half guilty and half believed his fabricated story. He either bit him or he didnt. Way too lenient
by bennymacca » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:45 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:MJ_23 wrote:Should have been 0, there was not enough evidence to give him weeks IMO.
He should've shown the umpire the teeth marks if he was fair dinkum about it, the umpire would've looked and made a quick assessment.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:48 pm
bennymacca wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:MJ_23 wrote:Should have been 0, there was not enough evidence to give him weeks IMO.
He should've shown the umpire the teeth marks if he was fair dinkum about it, the umpire would've looked and made a quick assessment.
The footage I saw pretty clearly showed him going up to the umpire straight away and showing him
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |