AFL - Round 3 discussion - (and lives scores)

[the joker]

I would of had tex in my best for the crows. delivery of the ball later in the game wasn't the best for him. it also looked as sanderson was pushing them all up to stop ports ball movement. When he was allowed to sit back in the 50 and the ball was put out in front or to his advantage he was giving us a bath.

He looked good early playing on Trengove but even Jenkins looked good when Trengove went to him
Petrenko and Trengove should of played on each other to see who was worst on ground today.
Jonas looks far better at the back

I've been calling Petrenko a hack for years!

No idea

[Squids]

I would of had tex in my best for the crows. delivery of the ball later in the game wasn't the best for him. it also looked as sanderson was pushing them all up to stop ports ball movement. When he was allowed to sit back in the 50 and the ball was put out in front or to his advantage he was giving us a bath.

He looked good early playing on Trengove but even Jenkins looked good when Trengove went to him
Petrenko and Trengove should of played on each other to see who was worst on ground today.
Jonas looks far better at the back

I've been calling Petrenko a hack for years!

No idea

He is a hack, end of story.

[Johno6]

He's as good as rioli..............................,

[Turbo]

[quote="kickinit"]I would of had tex in my best for the crows. delivery of the ball later in the game wasn't the best for him. it also looked as sanderson was pushing them all up to stop ports ball movement. When he was allowed to sit back in the 50 and the ball was put out in front or to his advantage he was giving us a bath.

He looked good early playing on Trengove but even Jenkins looked good when Trengove went to him
Petrenko and Trengove should of played on each other to see who was worst on ground today.
Jonas looks far better at the back

I've been calling Petrenko a hack for years!

No idea

He is a hack, end of story.[/quote]

Not worthy of his number

[JK]

Crows need a 2nd ruckman instead of using Jenkins which forces Walker up to CHF and makes it easy for defenders to double team him. Leave Walker at FF, Jenkins at CHF and ruck Jacobs and whoever else they pick as second ruck off the bench.

Wise man (not to be confused with the old bloke from Sturt)!

As others have said, Walker is still living on potential - I think most people believe he could be aq 70+ goal Full Forward, but he needs to grow up and deliver some substance and maturity to his game.

Scoreline flattered the Crows in the end - At the game Port just looked too quick and seemed to have a much bigger work-rate, just kept outnumbering the crows at the contest in the 2nd half.

Without jumping on a hype band-wagon Port could be top 8 possibly, but the Crows are in serious strife I reckon.

[Squids]

Crows need a 2nd ruckman instead of using Jenkins which forces Walker up to CHF and makes it easy for defenders to double team him. Leave Walker at FF, Jenkins at CHF and ruck Jacobs and whoever else they pick as second ruck off the bench.

Wise man (not to be confused with the old bloke from Sturt)!

As others have said, Walker is still living on potential - I think most people believe he could be aq 70+ goal Full Forward, but he needs to grow up and deliver some substance and maturity to his game.

Scoreline flattered the Crows in the end - At the game Port just looked too quick and seemed to have a much bigger work-rate, just kept outnumbering the crows at the contest in the 2nd half.

Without jumping on a hype band-wagon Port could be top 8 possibly, but the Crows are in serious strife I reckon.

I'm worried the power will over perform this year and win 8-11 games. This means next year they will get a tougher draw when they are not ready for it and have a shocking year. Getting a soft draw is a double edged sword imo.

Walker needs some help, Johnston has to play next week.

[JK]

I don't even know how the draw works these days - Thought it was based on several years worth of fixturing regardless of where a club finishes?

[Squids]

I don't even know how the draw works these days - Thought it was based on several years worth of fixturing regardless of where a club finishes?

Its rigged to buggery.

Bottom sides playing each other twice and the top teams only playing trash teams once unless they have 'rivalry'.

[JK]

I don't even know how the draw works these days - Thought it was based on several years worth of fixturing regardless of where a club finishes?

Its rigged to buggery.

Bottom sides playing each other twice and the top teams only playing trash teams once unless they have 'rivalry'.

Well it's hard to see either Port or Adelaide being big crowd drawers next season, so if that were the over-riding factor then both would expect soft draws

[Strawb]

security 1
streaker 0

lingy.JPG (22.52 KiB) Viewed 373 times

Channel 7 must not pay much looks like lingy

[Rik E Boy]

security 1
streaker 0

lingy.JPG

Channel 7 must not pay much looks like lingy

I hope he copped an absolute hiding. He cost us a shot at goal.

regards,

REB

[Rik E Boy]

I don't even know how the draw works these days - Thought it was based on several years worth of fixturing regardless of where a club finishes?

$

regards,

Andrew

[JK]

I don't even know how the draw works these days - Thought it was based on several years worth of fixturing regardless of where a club finishes?

$

regards,

Andrew

Yeah OK - And THAT! lol

[Punk Rooster]

Johnston needs to play next week after kicking 7 for North Adelaide. Would be a good Half forward option that may let Walker play closer to goal. Ken would of been laughing when he saw Walker up the ground.

hush...

[JK]

security 1
streaker 0

lingy.JPG

Channel 7 must not pay much looks like lingy

Looks like he's getting a hug for winning a Gold Medal at the Polevault

[Strawb]

security 1
streaker 0

lingy.JPG

Channel 7 must not pay much looks like lingy

Looks like he's getting a hug for winning a Gold Medal at the Polevault

there was more to the pic but yeah see my facebook wall

[stan]

Johnston needs to play next week after kicking 7 for North Adelaide. Would be a good Half forward option that may let Walker play closer to goal. Ken would of been laughing when he saw Walker up the ground.

hush...

There will be alot of talk about this through the week. I believe they need something else. But who knows if he'll play.

[Squids]

Only bad part was we will be missing a few players next week.
Kommer and Ryder will get a couple of games, Ryder may even get more and Hurley looks to have a bad wrist injury

Kommer yes, Ryder no.

You reckon Ryder is safe?
I loved the hit but unfortunately the AFL dont, he will get 4
Kommers was more clumsy than malicious, may get 1-2

Ryder stood his ground. Didn't leave ground to make contact. Seriously, if Thomas gets off for making head contact off the ball, then there's no way Ryder could get done.

Ryder offered 3

good call Q

[CoverKing]

Only bad part was we will be missing a few players next week.
Kommer and Ryder will get a couple of games, Ryder may even get more and Hurley looks to have a bad wrist injury

Kommer yes, Ryder no.

You reckon Ryder is safe?
I loved the hit but unfortunately the AFL dont, he will get 4
Kommers was more clumsy than malicious, may get 1-2

Ryder stood his ground. Didn't leave ground to make contact. Seriously, if Thomas gets off for making head contact off the ball, then there's no way Ryder could get done.

Clear difference IMO.

Thomas was an accidental head clash. Ryder hit McPharlin with his shoulder.

[Q.]

You reckon Ryder is safe?
I loved the hit but unfortunately the AFL dont, he will get 4
Kommers was more clumsy than malicious, may get 1-2

Ryder stood his ground. Didn't leave ground to make contact. Seriously, if Thomas gets off for making head contact off the ball, then there's no way Ryder could get done.

Clear difference IMO.

Thomas was an accidental head clash. Ryder hit McPharlin with his shoulder.

The MRP's stance on head contact was that if you initiated it, you were responsible for it. They didn't apply that to Thomas' case. Ryder's was in play, but obviously not deemed an accident.