Ben Cousins

Talk on the national game

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby the joker » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:21 pm

Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins
I love vegatarian food. It goes great with steak.
User avatar
the joker
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4687
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby A Mum » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:23 pm

:oops: Ooops.

Just posted that in another thread.
Didn't realise there were sooooo many threads getting around about Ben :D
You get what you give....
User avatar
A Mum
Coach
 
 
Posts: 10111
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:32 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby BALLHOG » Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:50 pm

the joker wrote:Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins


Don't Richmond need permission from the AFL first to put Polak on the rookie list?
User avatar
BALLHOG
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby A Mum » Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:51 pm

You get what you give....
User avatar
A Mum
Coach
 
 
Posts: 10111
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:32 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Dirko » Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:55 pm

BALLHOG wrote:
the joker wrote:Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins


Don't Richmond need permission from the AFL first to put Polak on the rookie list?



Reckon the other 15 clubs may kick up a fuss about this one, but the AFL will let it through if it guarantees Cousin's getting picked up.

Why didn't Richmond put Polak on the Rookie list BEFORE final list lodgement ? It's not as if they didn't know his condition. Totally different to the Rama case too IMO.

If they get Polak through to the rookie list, can of worms opened.....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:42 pm

when i popped into cafe de villi after work for something to eat on the drive home i saw the pic of cousins in the richmond jumper and thought at the quick glance it was the glenelg jumper and started getting excited...............but then i realised :(
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60561
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13280 times
Been liked: 4564 times

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby wycbloods » Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:19 pm

SJABC wrote:
BALLHOG wrote:
the joker wrote:Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins


Don't Richmond need permission from the AFL first to put Polak on the rookie list?



Reckon the other 15 clubs may kick up a fuss about this one, but the AFL will let it through if it guarantees Cousin's getting picked up.

Why didn't Richmond put Polak on the Rookie list BEFORE final list lodgement ? It's not as if they didn't know his condition. Totally different to the Rama case too IMO.

If they get Polak through to the rookie list, can of worms opened.....


I agree next thing clubs will be wanting to put those with serious injuries, such as knees, on the rookie list to pick up players in the PSD to cover the loss. I feel for Polak but they needed to either chop him or do this much earlier as they have known for a while it will be a long road to recovery for him.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby NO-MERCY » Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:57 pm

The League will do all they can to get Cousins to a club even if that means bending the rules.
The League aint happy with the criticism they've copped in the handling the Cousins case thus far, with that the legal ramifications they may face if he doesn't ( get drafted )
NO-MERCY
Coach
 
Posts: 5336
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:21 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby CoverKing » Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:37 pm

wycbloods wrote:
SJABC wrote:
BALLHOG wrote:
the joker wrote:Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins


Don't Richmond need permission from the AFL first to put Polak on the rookie list?



Reckon the other 15 clubs may kick up a fuss about this one, but the AFL will let it through if it guarantees Cousin's getting picked up.

Why didn't Richmond put Polak on the Rookie list BEFORE final list lodgement ? It's not as if they didn't know his condition. Totally different to the Rama case too IMO.

If they get Polak through to the rookie list, can of worms opened.....


I agree next thing clubs will be wanting to put those with serious injuries, such as knees, on the rookie list to pick up players in the PSD to cover the loss. I feel for Polak but they needed to either chop him or do this much earlier as they have known for a while it will be a long road to recovery for him.


It's not everyday a bloke gets hit by a tram Bloods, this circumstance is completely different to a person doing a knee injury which happens to around 5-10 people per year...IT is an extra-ordinary circumstance like that of Rama's, and richmond should be allowed to have Polak on there rookie list IMO... BRing on cousins though.
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Dirko » Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:46 pm

CoverKing wrote:It's not everyday a bloke gets hit by a tram Bloods, this circumstance is completely different to a person doing a knee injury which happens to around 5-10 people per year...IT is an extra-ordinary circumstance like that of Rama's, and richmond should be allowed to have Polak on there rookie list IMO... BRing on cousins though.


BULLSHIT. When did he get hit by a tram ? When was the final list due ? What a crock of shit. Richmond could've done this BEFORE the the due dates. Richmond could've had Polak on the rookie list IF they did it before due date..... :roll:
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Real McCoy » Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:46 am

Not 100% sure here, but don't the Bombers get a pick before Richmond,that being the case would Knights take him to piss off his old club.
Would love to see him in a Red & Black jumper.
Real McCoy
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:55 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:13 am

This is so "Richmond" isn't it? They have this compulsion to make adhoc decisions all the time which land them in hot water. Here we are, months and months after other clubs have done a host of checks and balances resulting in a resounding strike against Cousins .. and then along comes Richmond.

Sheedy speaks with Cousins last weekend, then suggests to Wallace they should take him, and suddenly it's a great idea. No consideration given as to why other clubs weren't interested. I've heard the Richmond president approached Collingwood wanting to know what they paid big bucks finding out .. and Collingwood told them to work it out for themselves.

I agree totally with Dermott Brereton here, Richmond have done a great job over the past couple of years bringing the kids through, why would they even consider doing this? Total mystery .. but then again, that's Richmond.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby THE MOLE » Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:48 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:This is so "Richmond" isn't it? They have this compulsion to make adhoc decisions all the time which land them in hot water. Here we are, months and months after other clubs have done a host of checks and balances resulting in a resounding strike against Cousins .. and then along comes Richmond.

Sheedy speaks with Cousins last weekend, then suggests to Wallace they should take him, and suddenly it's a great idea. No consideration given as to why other clubs weren't interested. I've heard the Richmond president approached Collingwood wanting to know what they paid big bucks finding out .. and Collingwood told them to work it out for themselves.

I agree totally with Dermott Brereton here, Richmond have done a great job over the past couple of years bringing the kids through, why would they even consider doing this? Total mystery .. but then again, that's Richmond.


If i am right Wallace is in the 5th year of his 5 year contract and he said they werent making the finals by the end of his 5th year that he wasnt a success............. Maybe hes thinking of his next contract and is trying to get cousins to give him his best chance
THE MOLE
Under 18s
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:14 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Booney » Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:30 pm

Parhaps Richmond are onto something.

For a moment,forget what sponsors,fans and the playing group think,if your club was to pick up a player of Ben Cousins on field qualities next year,would it improve your teams chances of winning games/playing finals?

A resounding yes must be the only answer.

So perhaps Richmond are focussing on football,which primarily,is the business they are in,winning football games.

(Well,Richmond aren't actually in this business ;) )
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61121
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8080 times
Been liked: 11778 times

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Dirko » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:01 pm

Booney wrote:Parhaps Richmond are onto something.

For a moment,forget what sponsors,fans and the playing group think,if your club was to pick up a player of Ben Cousins on field qualities next year,would it improve your teams chances of winning games/playing finals?

A resounding yes must be the only answer.

So perhaps Richmond are focussing on football,which primarily,is the business they are in,winning football games.

(Well,Richmond aren't actually in this business ;) )


The issue IMO isn't whether they get Cousins or not, it's the way the morons are doing it. The whole Polak thing on the rookie list is just plain ignorance and stupidity. How much time did it take for Sheedy to arrive and declare his hand.
Sheed to Wallace - "Yep better get Benny over ".
Wallace and others - "But we have no room on our list".
Sheeds - "Hang on we had Rama at Essendon, the AFL allowed him on the rookie list, due to exceptional circumstance"
Wallace - "Ohh yeah, um, but Polak got hit by the Tram 6 months ago, umm you think the AFL will let us, if we're too stupid to have done it before list lodgement dates"
Sheeds "Shit yeah, just tell 'em Sheeds said so"
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Booney » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:08 pm

Bit of a narrow minded view IMO.

Have you considered Richmond were not in a position to make a decision on Polak's long term future before now?

They would have waited as long as possible before they made a decision like this.(To place him back on the rookie list)
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61121
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8080 times
Been liked: 11778 times

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Dirko » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:30 pm

Booney wrote:Bit of a narrow minded view IMO.

Have you considered Richmond were not in a position to make a decision on Polak's long term future before now?

They would have waited as long as possible before they made a decision like this.(To place him back on the rookie list)



So they didn't know before what two weeks ago ? All the medical assistance and information presented to them BEFORE he started pre-season wouldn't have been enough to make a informed decision. Hell when he was hit it was doubtful whether he'd play again, so that was what 6 months ago, so unless you totally ignore the doctors and medical staff, you'd know his status for season 2009 would be doubtful at best.
Why wouldn't they approach the AFL before the list was due and raise the issue that perhaps Polak may be out for the whole year, and ask then ?

It's not as if Polak was in danger of losing his spot. He is contracted for 2009, unlike Rama who came out of contract when the cancer hit.

Piss poor planing by Richmond IMO, and I hope the AFL don't let them get away with it......
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby SCD » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:34 pm

IMO Richmond should be given special consideration here..

They are standing by a player who clearly will not be well enough to play AFL or any level of football next year as he recovers from head injuries.

Collingwood / Geelong and every other team had an oportunity to pick him in the draft and choose not to - where is their issue.. that Richmond will have 40 fit blokes to play next year.. FFS - get over it.. they will only finish 9th anyway ;) ;)
Port Power has 16 years history at Football Park...

The Port Magpies have 40 years history and the two shall never be confused or combined
User avatar
SCD
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1743
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: At the Track
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Booney » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:32 pm

I agree,it is typically 'Richmondesque',however,IMO they have done what they can to give Polak a chance to :

1 : Get fit for 2009

2 : When they realised it would not be in Polak's best interest to 'push' him to be near playing in 2009 they have made adjustments accordingly.

As I said,very Richmond like,but they are acting now on what they think is best for them.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61121
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8080 times
Been liked: 11778 times

Re: Ben Cousins

Postby Hondo » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:46 pm

According to Adrian Barich on 5AA last night, this opportunity at Richmond has only just cropped up and it (allegedly) followed Sheedy speaking to Ben, after the draft, and basically telling him to swallow his pride and start again with a new approach to make it as easy as possible for a new club to want to pick him up, rather than making it as hard as possible as Ben seemingly had been trying to do before the ND.

I think Barich said that Sheeds told Ben to go to Richmond and plead his case while he and the club planned how to make it happen via the the Polak arrangement. To cut a long story short, it seems entirely feasible that Richmond have only considered Cousins and the Polak option in the last week or so. Hence the answer to the question of why Richmond didn't do anything earlier.

As I have said before, I'd like to see him get a second crack and restore some of his reputation, on the field at least. If that means a special arrangement for Polak then I don't have an issue with it. I don't want to see administrative red tape getting in the way.
Last edited by Hondo on Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |