by the joker » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:21 pm
by A Mum » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:23 pm
by BALLHOG » Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:50 pm
the joker wrote:Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins
by Dirko » Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:55 pm
BALLHOG wrote:the joker wrote:Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins
Don't Richmond need permission from the AFL first to put Polak on the rookie list?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:42 pm
by wycbloods » Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:19 pm
SJABC wrote:BALLHOG wrote:the joker wrote:Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins
Don't Richmond need permission from the AFL first to put Polak on the rookie list?
Reckon the other 15 clubs may kick up a fuss about this one, but the AFL will let it through if it guarantees Cousin's getting picked up.
Why didn't Richmond put Polak on the Rookie list BEFORE final list lodgement ? It's not as if they didn't know his condition. Totally different to the Rama case too IMO.
If they get Polak through to the rookie list, can of worms opened.....
by NO-MERCY » Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:57 pm
by CoverKing » Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:37 pm
wycbloods wrote:SJABC wrote:BALLHOG wrote:the joker wrote:Richmond are set to put Polak on the Rookie list next year, so they can pick up Cousins
Don't Richmond need permission from the AFL first to put Polak on the rookie list?
Reckon the other 15 clubs may kick up a fuss about this one, but the AFL will let it through if it guarantees Cousin's getting picked up.
Why didn't Richmond put Polak on the Rookie list BEFORE final list lodgement ? It's not as if they didn't know his condition. Totally different to the Rama case too IMO.
If they get Polak through to the rookie list, can of worms opened.....
I agree next thing clubs will be wanting to put those with serious injuries, such as knees, on the rookie list to pick up players in the PSD to cover the loss. I feel for Polak but they needed to either chop him or do this much earlier as they have known for a while it will be a long road to recovery for him.
by Dirko » Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:46 pm
CoverKing wrote:It's not everyday a bloke gets hit by a tram Bloods, this circumstance is completely different to a person doing a knee injury which happens to around 5-10 people per year...IT is an extra-ordinary circumstance like that of Rama's, and richmond should be allowed to have Polak on there rookie list IMO... BRing on cousins though.
by Real McCoy » Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:46 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:13 am
by THE MOLE » Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:48 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:This is so "Richmond" isn't it? They have this compulsion to make adhoc decisions all the time which land them in hot water. Here we are, months and months after other clubs have done a host of checks and balances resulting in a resounding strike against Cousins .. and then along comes Richmond.
Sheedy speaks with Cousins last weekend, then suggests to Wallace they should take him, and suddenly it's a great idea. No consideration given as to why other clubs weren't interested. I've heard the Richmond president approached Collingwood wanting to know what they paid big bucks finding out .. and Collingwood told them to work it out for themselves.
I agree totally with Dermott Brereton here, Richmond have done a great job over the past couple of years bringing the kids through, why would they even consider doing this? Total mystery .. but then again, that's Richmond.
by Booney » Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:30 pm
by Dirko » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:01 pm
Booney wrote:Parhaps Richmond are onto something.
For a moment,forget what sponsors,fans and the playing group think,if your club was to pick up a player of Ben Cousins on field qualities next year,would it improve your teams chances of winning games/playing finals?
A resounding yes must be the only answer.
So perhaps Richmond are focussing on football,which primarily,is the business they are in,winning football games.
(Well,Richmond aren't actually in this business)
by Booney » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:08 pm
by Dirko » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:30 pm
Booney wrote:Bit of a narrow minded view IMO.
Have you considered Richmond were not in a position to make a decision on Polak's long term future before now?
They would have waited as long as possible before they made a decision like this.(To place him back on the rookie list)
by SCD » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:34 pm
by Booney » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:32 pm
by Hondo » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:46 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |