on the rails wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:The hypocrisy of Eagles fans booing Watson isn't really surprising I guess.
I see your Watson and raise you a Cousins!
One is a drug cheat, one is a drug addict. Whats your point
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:43 pm
on the rails wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:The hypocrisy of Eagles fans booing Watson isn't really surprising I guess.
I see your Watson and raise you a Cousins!
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:43 pm
on the rails wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:The hypocrisy of Eagles fans booing Watson isn't really surprising I guess.
I see your Watson and raise you a Cousins!
by whufc » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:46 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:50 pm
whufc wrote:Is it correct to say one is a player who used performance enhancing drugs, the other is a player who was addicted to more than likely a performance decreasing drug.
I would say there is a tad of difference between the two.
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:55 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:Is it correct to say one is a player who used performance enhancing drugs, the other is a player who was addicted to more than likely a performance decreasing drug.
I would say there is a tad of difference between the two.
Banned substance is a banned substance. One was found guilty, one is yet to, and may not be.
by Johno6 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:00 pm
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:06 pm
by Johno6 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:08 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:08 pm
helicopterking wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:Is it correct to say one is a player who used performance enhancing drugs, the other is a player who was addicted to more than likely a performance decreasing drug.
I would say there is a tad of difference between the two.
Banned substance is a banned substance. One was found guilty, one is yet to, and may not be.
Cant remember anything at the time saying he was guilty?
by Johno6 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:12 pm
by on the rails » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:13 pm
whufc wrote:Is it correct to say one is a player who used performance enhancing drugs, the other is a player who was addicted to more than likely a performance decreasing drug.
I would say there is a tad of difference between the two.
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:14 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:helicopterking wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:Is it correct to say one is a player who used performance enhancing drugs, the other is a player who was addicted to more than likely a performance decreasing drug.
I would say there is a tad of difference between the two.
Banned substance is a banned substance. One was found guilty, one is yet to, and may not be.
Cant remember anything at the time saying he was guilty?
Got banned for nothing did he?
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:15 pm
Johno6 wrote:Lings comment amused me when he said Ryder had been good in the ruck. Especially against NIC NAT and cox.
Who else is he rucking against?
by Johno6 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:21 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:21 pm
helicopterking wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:helicopterking wrote:At the time, the evidence said not guilty, pulled over by Police for drug possession, got banned, was not charged by police.
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:26 pm
by Johno6 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:28 pm
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:30 pm
by JK » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:31 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |