Rik E Boy wrote:You comedy showed promise but the crowd started leaving when you said you wanted Collingwood to win the premiership.
regards,
REB
It was the hardest part to type thats for sure
.Buckley wont be at the Roos
26 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Buckley wont be at the Roos
by wycbloods » Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:13 pm
It was the hardest part to type thats for sure
."Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.
CoverKing said what?
Agree with AF on this one!
CoverKing said what?
Agree with AF on this one!
- wycbloods
- Coach
-
- Posts: 7006
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
- Location: WYC or Westies
- Has liked: 13 times
- Been liked: 20 times
Re: Buckley wont be at the Roos
by dedja » Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:52 pm
Congratulations to the eternal non-achievers of the VFL/AFL with one premiership in 50 years who have a President who thinks with his dick more that his head to create such an unlikely and stupid coaching truce.
Toss out a successful, hardened coach with a untried novice after 2 years ... only Eddie could come up with that one. If Malthouse is successful in the next 2 years, then what?
May this embelish the mediocrity that your club deserves.
Toss out a successful, hardened coach with a untried novice after 2 years ... only Eddie could come up with that one. If Malthouse is successful in the next 2 years, then what?
May this embelish the mediocrity that your club deserves.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Re: Buckley wont be at the Roos
by Gingernuts » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:34 pm
dedja wrote:Congratulations to the eternal non-achievers of the VFL/AFL with one premiership in 50 years who have a President who thinks with his dick more that his head to create such an unlikely and stupid coaching truce.
Toss out a successful, hardened coach with a untried novice after 2 years ... only Eddie could come up with that one. If Malthouse is successful in the next 2 years, then what?
May this embelish the mediocrity that your club deserves.
lol. Don't hold back there dedja, tell us what you really think.
-
Gingernuts - League - Top 5
-
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek
Re: Buckley wont be at the Roos
by dedja » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:53 pm
Gingernuts wrote:lol. Don't hold back there dedja, tell us what you really think.
did I go too far?
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Re: Buckley wont be at the Roos
by Dutchy » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:25 pm
I can see the Collingwood thing ending in tears, Eddie is trying to create a fairytale in the future which is over 2 years away, probably looks and sounds good in theory but lets see how practical it is...
Anyone with any business sense knows you cant plan down to this much detail, something will go wrong and it will blow up in their face with a good chance Buckley will be the loser out of it all
Anyone with any business sense knows you cant plan down to this much detail, something will go wrong and it will blow up in their face with a good chance Buckley will be the loser out of it all
Re: Buckley wont be at the Roos
by Booney » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:57 pm
Dutchy wrote:I can see the Collingwood thing ending in tears, Eddie is trying to create a fairytale in the future which is over 2 years away, probably looks and sounds good in theory but lets see how practical it is...
Anyone with any business sense knows you cant plan down to this much detail, something will go wrong and it will blow up in their face with a good chance Buckley will be the loser out of it all
Buckley will lose, he'll end up at the Roos....
PAFC. Forever.
LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
26 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Football AFL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management