NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Talk on the national game

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed May 13, 2009 5:41 pm

Yes, what should the penalty be for consensual sex seven years after the event? If you have gone on to have a successful media career then that penalty is that you lose two jobs and have a bigger media following than Ben Cousins. If you remain an 'unknown Cronulla player' then the penalty apparently is zero.

If the Kiwi woman was so traumatised why wait for that trauma to fester for seven long years before coming forward. Heaven forbid that a media outlet, one of among many trying to get another angle on an over publicised sporting world perhaps sent a few Somolians accross the Tasman to obtain verification of whift of a rumour? Surely not! Whipped up by the media and possibly the coin this woman has found her mark and is now having her 15 minutes of fame for something that traumatised her so much she said nothing for seven years.

Was it rape? Well, I don't recall the court case. If a crime has been committed then let Johns et al stand trial amongst a jury of their peers.

Is it about respect for women? Respect is not handed out but earnt whether you are a male or a female. And like it or not birds that put on a gangbang for the boys might be highly appreciated at the time but it is not something that is likely to gain you respect. If you want respect, start off by respecting yourself.

Opportunism and media hypocrisy and a severly manufactured 'crisis'. Nothing more, nothing less.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28497
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Dog_ger » Wed May 13, 2009 5:49 pm

Tragic case.

He's going to lose everything.

The man will end up having to work for a living. ;)

Kill, Crush, Destroy.
Smile :)

It's only Money $$$ :)

What is happening to our SANFL guys...
User avatar
Dog_ger
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Salisbury Downs
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 19 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Gingernuts » Wed May 13, 2009 6:57 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:Yes, what should the penalty be for consensual sex seven years after the event? If you have gone on to have a successful media career then that penalty is that you lose two jobs and have a bigger media following than Ben Cousins. If you remain an 'unknown Cronulla player' then the penalty apparently is zero.

If the Kiwi woman was so traumatised why wait for that trauma to fester for seven long years before coming forward. Heaven forbid that a media outlet, one of among many trying to get another angle on an over publicised sporting world perhaps sent a few Somolians accross the Tasman to obtain verification of whift of a rumour? Surely not! Whipped up by the media and possibly the coin this woman has found her mark and is now having her 15 minutes of fame for something that traumatised her so much she said nothing for seven years.

Was it rape? Well, I don't recall the court case. If a crime has been committed then let Johns et al stand trial amongst a jury of their peers.

Is it about respect for women? Respect is not handed out but earnt whether you are a male or a female. And like it or not birds that put on a gangbang for the boys might be highly appreciated at the time but it is not something that is likely to gain you respect. If you want respect, start off by respecting yourself.

Opportunism and media hypocrisy and a severly manufactured 'crisis'. Nothing more, nothing less.

regards,

REB


Good post REB. Surely given the lack of charges Johns has a fairly good defamation case against 4 Corners.
User avatar
Gingernuts
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Interceptor » Wed May 13, 2009 8:26 pm

Gingernuts wrote:Good post REB. Surely given the lack of charges Johns has a fairly good defamation case against 4 Corners.

I'm no legal expert, but I'd say he'd probably have more chance of getting Unfair Dismissal against Channel 9.
All 4 Corners really did was to say he was 1 of the 2 players originally with the girl.

Is it fair that the case is brought out in the open 7 years later? Probably not since no charges were ever laid.
It's not clear whether 4 Corners contacted the girl first or vice versa.
The bottom line is that it went to air and Johns is the fall guy.
User avatar
Interceptor
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2987
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: London, UK
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Dutchy » Wed May 13, 2009 9:23 pm

The fact their wernt charges after being investigated by police is good enough for me - if there was any sniff of rape and/or assault they all would have been put in front of courts to make a decision.

Hats off to his wife for being so strong and standing by him - she is the one I feel sorry for
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45971
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 4199 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby MW » Wed May 13, 2009 9:49 pm

Absolute joke the treatment of Matt Johns....absolute joke. Channel 9 and the two clubs he used to coach have no balls whatsoever. Shame. :evil:
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13721
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2748 times
Been liked: 1981 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Thiele » Wed May 13, 2009 10:24 pm

Seems like Johns has been treated unfairly
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28397
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 173 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby redden whites » Thu May 14, 2009 12:59 am

Thiele wrote:Seems like Johns has been treated unfairly

Please elaborate on the unfairness.I would be most interested.
User avatar
redden whites
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:09 am
Location: On the way to Bonnie Doon
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby gadj1976 » Thu May 14, 2009 7:30 am

A mate of mine and I were talking about this and trying to recall what happened when Shane Warne was 'found out'. What did Channel 9 do?

I recall later on in the piece there were moves to reinstate him but can't recall if that ever happened.

I think the penalty in Johns's case is pretty harsh.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9274
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 803 times
Been liked: 871 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Dirko » Thu May 14, 2009 9:37 am

redden whites wrote:
Thiele wrote:Seems like Johns has been treated unfairly

Please elaborate on the unfairness.I would be most interested.


Please elaborate on the treatment given to the other blokes involved ?

Johns has been set up as the fall guy in this one for sure, and Channel 9 & the
Rugby Teams are doing what they think looks good, but in reality is making them look
like over reacting jerks.

Also Channel 9 "bone" him indefinitely, yet they interview him for a Current Affair a night later. Hypocrites.
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby mypaddock » Thu May 14, 2009 10:48 am

Who he sleeps with should have no impact on his employment status one would think.
Clearly this woman is out to make a dollar. :twisted:

IMO honest opinion these sports 'groupies' deserve most of what comes their way. These are loose women who have no self respect and in turn are treated with no respect from these sportsmen.

Think back to the whole fiasco with Kobe Bryant from the LA Lakers- why would someone of his stature (money/fame) need to rape someone?? He could walk into any bar/club in the US and choose from a dozen or so women to sleep with, if he so desires.
mypaddock
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:51 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Dogwatcher » Thu May 14, 2009 10:58 am

Fame and fortune does not preclude a man from raping a woman.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby mypaddock » Thu May 14, 2009 11:00 am

Dogwatcher wrote:Fame and fortune does not preclude a man from raping a woman.


Correct, but it does increase your chances of being sued by loose women.
mypaddock
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:51 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Interceptor » Thu May 14, 2009 11:21 am

mypaddock wrote:Who he sleeps with should have no impact on his employment status one would think.
Clearly this woman is out to make a dollar. :twisted:

Think again. The women hasn't sued Johns or anyone else.
She wasn't interviewed by Today Tonight or another commercial organisation with the cheque book out.
She was interviewed by the ABC with her identity withheld.

Esssentially Nine are to trying protect whatever commercial image they have amongst viewers.
Johns wasn't charged or convicted of a crime, but he did get found out about cheating on his wife and it seems that's enough for the Nine bosses.
User avatar
Interceptor
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2987
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: London, UK
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Hondo » Thu May 14, 2009 12:06 pm

mypaddock wrote:Who he sleeps with should have no impact on his employment status one would think.
Clearly this woman is out to make a dollar. :twisted:

IMO honest opinion these sports 'groupies' deserve most of what comes their way. These are loose women who have no self respect and in turn are treated with no respect from these sportsmen.


Come on, think about what you're saying. No-one 'deserves' any sort of bad treatment. Even if someone had no self respect that doesn't mean they shouldn't be shown any. Just because you CAN do something, when you are in a group with your mates, doesn't mean you SHOULD.

1 - don't generalise women, you don't know how this specific event unfolded
2 - don't defend poor behaviour towards women by men on the grounds that it's deserved. There's a massive power imbalance, both physically and psychologically, when it comes to well-known sportsmen meeting young women, particularly when alcohol is involved. Even the most self respecting woman can be induced into a bad situation if she meets one of her "heroes". It's about how the sportmen choose to use, or abuse, their "chick pulling" power.

In this case, I don't think 12 guys in the room with 1 women can be defended on the grounds that she wanted that to happen. Consent may have been given on the basis of some number smaller than 12, then things probably got out of hand. Is she making up the trauma she claims she feels? Well, none of us know for sure but I think she deserves to not be dismissed out of hand just because one of our favourite sportsmen has lost his job over it.

Should he have lost job over it? TBH, I don't know.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Dogwatcher » Thu May 14, 2009 12:22 pm

I'd be really interested to hear the thoughts of female posters about this.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby JK » Thu May 14, 2009 12:59 pm

hondo71 wrote:
mypaddock wrote:Who he sleeps with should have no impact on his employment status one would think.
Clearly this woman is out to make a dollar. :twisted:

IMO honest opinion these sports 'groupies' deserve most of what comes their way. These are loose women who have no self respect and in turn are treated with no respect from these sportsmen.


Come on, think about what you're saying. No-one 'deserves' any sort of bad treatment. Even if someone had no self respect that doesn't mean they shouldn't be shown any. Just because you CAN do something, when you are in a group with your mates, doesn't mean you SHOULD.


All things being equal then, Fev shouldn't be on the footy show because he assaulted someone in an Irish bar?

I know that's not the world we live in (where everything is equal), but does an immoral act against a male hold less weight than an immoral act against a female?

It's a tricky situation.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby silicone skyline » Thu May 14, 2009 1:15 pm

Pretty funny cartoon in Today's 'Tiser
Ruthless and Relentless
User avatar
silicone skyline
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6329
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Amsterdam
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Hondo » Thu May 14, 2009 1:55 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:All things being equal then, Fev shouldn't be on the footy show because he assaulted someone in an Irish bar?


Dunno on Fev. I'm not sure either way on the responses of Ch9 and the club in sacking Johns. I am was just responding to the "loose women" comment.

Constance_Perm wrote:I know that's not the world we live in (where everything is equal), but does an immoral act against a male hold less weight than an immoral act against a female?


No
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: NRL and group sex - implications for AFL

Postby Dirko » Thu May 14, 2009 1:58 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:All things being equal then, Fev shouldn't be on the footy show because he assaulted someone in an Irish bar?


As opposed to Bickley assaulting someone on the Footy oval....

Where do you want to draw the line ?
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 23 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |