No Bumping

Talk on the national game

Re: No Bumping

Postby Hondo » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:53 pm

It's interesting because 20 years ago no-one would have said "oh, we don't want to see X incident" in the game. "X incident" being an old-style high shirt front. We saw it as part of a physical game. Now most agree that the really bad incidents are best left in the 80s. Some feel it's gone to far the other way however even this thread shows that the average AFL follower has changed their view on what is acceptable - the standards have gone up.

IMO there's too much hysteria about the recent re-write of the rule. There's no rule that actually says the bump is dead (illegal). "Avoidable" bumps that risk a head or neck injury are dead. Split-second/ no alternative hits will still happen as it's still a contact sport, and always will be.

The last year or so tribunal decisions have reflected (most times) a more common sense approach then the hysteria would make you think. Last year's Showdown I was a good example of the sort of bumps that are OK. And that game happened while the AFL had their current POV on bumps.

How else can you word the rule so that the head and neck are protected? If you leave a "accident" exclusion then every player will simply say it was an accident. No-one will admit they were blatantly charging. Then what? I think the AFL are cuaght between a OHS rock and a legal hard place. Society's changed from 30 years ago.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: No Bumping

Postby JK » Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:11 pm

hondo71 wrote:Then what? I think the AFL are cuaght between a OHS rock and a legal hard place. Society's changed from 30 years ago.


Agree with that, and reckon that must be the predominate reason, hence the choice of words being "Negligant".

Whichever way you look at it though, the game has lost, and will lose more of the bumping because a split second shift in direction from the target/recipient means you can injure him, despite that not being the intention.

Im not suggesting there's a perfect solution, but it doesn't make it any less sad for those of us who have always enjoyed that aspect of the game.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37459
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: No Bumping

Postby HH3 » Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:59 pm

I dont think theres anything wrong with a blindside shirtfront thats been lined up from 20m away. As long as you hit them in between the shoulders and waist and not in the back. A player should be aware of his surroundings.
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
HH3
Coach
 
Posts: 11642
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
Has liked: 3301 times
Been liked: 2433 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: No Bumping

Postby HH3 » Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:16 pm

I got told last night that the shirtfront has been outlawed in the SFL....might have to test that one out ;)
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
HH3
Coach
 
Posts: 11642
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
Has liked: 3301 times
Been liked: 2433 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Previous

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |