SA Footy

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Spargo wrote:

mots02 wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:Saints a good bet at 23 bucks for the flag i reckon

you spelt 'hugely optimistic' wrong

F#ck, I’ll give you 50’s on St Kilda

One of the commentators said last Thursday he thought the Saints were a genuine contender for the flag. he also said he thought there were about 8 with a big chance, he didn't rattle any other teams off though.

I still think the Bulldogs are a dark horse, poor start but sneaking under the radar now.

Brisbane have got it all set up for them. They'll barely leave home, might go to Sydney from time to time but that'll be about it.

I thought Port were gonna have a richmond-esque draw late in the year....

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I thought Port were gonna have a richmond-esque draw late in the year....

Probably will, but Brisbane are a better side than Port and so might a few others be, we haven't found out yet.

Booney wrote:
Brisbane have got it all set up for them. They'll barely leave home, might go to Sydney from time to time but that'll be about it.

Well I think we can safely say that there will no more games in Melbourne this season, Victoria will need to clean their shit up within 6 weeks to have any hope of hosting finals.

Brisbane would definitely be favourites, Port and GWS would have to be on the next level of betting, followed by Collingwood, Richmond then the Saints an Bulldogs close behind.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Booney wrote:
Brisbane have got it all set up for them. They'll barely leave home, might go to Sydney from time to time but that'll be about it.

Well I think we can safely say that there will no more games in Melbourne this season, Victoria will need to clean their shit up within 6 weeks to have any hope of hosting finals.

Brisbane would definitely be favourites, Port and GWS would have to be on the next level of betting, followed by Collingwood, Richmond then the Saints an Bulldogs close behind.

Do not discount West Coast.

Spargo wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Booney wrote:
Brisbane have got it all set up for them. They'll barely leave home, might go to Sydney from time to time but that'll be about it.

Well I think we can safely say that there will no more games in Melbourne this season, Victoria will need to clean their shit up within 6 weeks to have any hope of hosting finals.

Brisbane would definitely be favourites, Port and GWS would have to be on the next level of betting, followed by Collingwood, Richmond then the Saints an Bulldogs close behind.

Do not discount West Coast.

I agree, but they don't look anywhere near hungry enough right now.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Booney wrote:
Brisbane have got it all set up for them. They'll barely leave home, might go to Sydney from time to time but that'll be about it.

Well I think we can safely say that there will no more games in Melbourne this season, Victoria will need to clean their shit up within 6 weeks to have any hope of hosting finals.

Brisbane would definitely be favourites, Port and GWS would have to be on the next level of betting, followed by Collingwood, Richmond then the Saints an Bulldogs close behind.

The GF will still be at the MCG IMO. October is still a long way off and chances are other states may have cases by then

If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

Booney wrote:If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

Yeah, I guess they can still quarantine for two weeks after the GF.

Booney wrote:If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

I dunno, if they can’t have crowds but NSW can, 100k people at Stadium Australia (or whatever TF it’s called these days) would be pretty appealing for the $$ on offer.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Booney wrote:If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

Yeah, I guess they can still quarantine for two weeks after the GF.

Yep a 2 week footy trip enforced by quarantine - hire out a pub. Paradise!

JK wrote:

Booney wrote:If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

I dunno, if they can’t have crowds but NSW can, 100k people at Stadium Australia (or whatever TF it’s called these days) would be pretty appealing for the $$ on offer.

What will the MCC want as compensation?

Booney wrote:

JK wrote:

Booney wrote:If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

I dunno, if they can’t have crowds but NSW can, 100k people at Stadium Australia (or whatever TF it’s called these days) would be pretty appealing for the $$ on offer.

What will the MCC want as compensation?

To lock in the GF for 100yrs after current deal ends



Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

And the Vic gov will want a partial refund

JK wrote:

Booney wrote:If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

I dunno, if they can’t have crowds but NSW can, 100k people at Stadium Australia (or whatever TF it’s called these days) would be pretty appealing for the $$ on offer.

Try 82k and it wouldn't surprise me if the mechanism to move it back into an oval no longer works.

Wedgie wrote:

JK wrote:

Booney wrote:If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

I dunno, if they can’t have crowds but NSW can, 100k people at Stadium Australia (or whatever TF it’s called these days) would be pretty appealing for the $$ on offer.

Try 82k and it wouldn't surprise me if the mechanism to move it back into an oval no longer works.

rather take the risk with covid then play a grand final at that sh*t hole ANZ stadium

woodublieve12 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

JK wrote:

Booney wrote:If anyone even for a moment thinks the GF will be anywhere but the MCG they are kidding themselves. Crowds or not, they'll play it there.

I dunno, if they can’t have crowds but NSW can, 100k people at Stadium Australia (or whatever TF it’s called these days) would be pretty appealing for the $$ on offer.

Try 82k and it wouldn't surprise me if the mechanism to move it back into an oval no longer works.

rather take the risk with covid then play a grand final at that sh*t hole ANZ stadium

Lucky you wont have to worry about GF's for a long time

probably not, on a positive though your lot aren't any closer either

Hefty wrote:Sportsbet have Crows not to win a game @ $5.00. Money for jam!

Massive unders. You will get much better doing all up bets for each game.

Bum Crack wrote:Saints a good bet at 23 bucks for the flag i reckon

Bullies at $18's for me