Wedgie wrote:LOL, McKernan gets 2 weeks for an ugly elbow to the head and Stevie J got 2 weeks for a hip and shoulder.
WTF is seriously going on with the game?
Does McKernan have a record like johnson's?
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:56 am
Wedgie wrote:LOL, McKernan gets 2 weeks for an ugly elbow to the head and Stevie J got 2 weeks for a hip and shoulder.
WTF is seriously going on with the game?
by Jim05 » Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:25 pm
by kickinit » Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:49 pm
Jim05 wrote:Westhoff contesting his ban, doesn't face losing an extra week
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:20 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:58 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Wedgie wrote:LOL, McKernan gets 2 weeks for an ugly elbow to the head and Stevie J got 2 weeks for a hip and shoulder.
WTF is seriously going on with the game?
Does McKernan have a record like johnson's?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Turbo » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:00 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Silly challenge. Should get an extra week for time wasting.
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:46 pm
Wedgie wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Wedgie wrote:LOL, McKernan gets 2 weeks for an ugly elbow to the head and Stevie J got 2 weeks for a hip and shoulder.
WTF is seriously going on with the game?
Does McKernan have a record like johnson's?
Worse looking at what he did, Stevie J's only bumped and tackled blokes where McKernan has assaulted one!![]()
by NO-MERCY » Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:40 am
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:41 am
NO-MERCY wrote:McGinnity 3 weeksshould of got reprimand.
McKernan 2 weeks :shock: should of got 4-5
S.Johnson 2 weeksshould of got off.
Westhoff 1 weekanother that should of got off.
The panel have NFI, talk about consistent.
Consistently getting it wrong.
by Footy Smart » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:17 am
NO-MERCY wrote:McGinnity 3 weeksshould of got reprimand.
McKernan 2 weeksshould of got 4-5
S.Johnson 2 weeksshould of got off.
Westhoff 1 weekanother that should of got off.
The panel have NFI, talk about consistent.
Consistently getting it wrong.
by Jim05 » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:25 am
Footy Smart wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:McGinnity 3 weeksshould of got reprimand.
McKernan 2 weeksshould of got 4-5
S.Johnson 2 weeksshould of got off.
Westhoff 1 weekanother that should of got off.
The panel have NFI, talk about consistent.
Consistently getting it wrong.
NM agree with all of above but I cant see how people think Westoff should have gotten off? He clearly made intentional contact with the jaw of a essendon player with his elbow after the siren
by Zorro » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:26 am
Footy Smart wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:McGinnity 3 weeksshould of got reprimand.
McKernan 2 weeksshould of got 4-5
S.Johnson 2 weeksshould of got off.
Westhoff 1 weekanother that should of got off.
The panel have NFI, talk about consistent.
Consistently getting it wrong.
NM agree with all of above but I cant see how people think Westoff should have gotten off? He clearly made intentional contact with the jaw of a essendon player with his elbow after the siren
by Footy Smart » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:40 am
Im an Essendon member and I think Westhoff should of got off.
Hooker made of meal of it and went fown like he was shot. He suffered no injury whatsoever.
Was only a glancing blow and no worse than the jumper punch he gave back to Westhoff
by Jim05 » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:57 am
Footy Smart wrote:Im an Essendon member and I think Westhoff should of got off.
Hooker made of meal of it and went fown like he was shot. He suffered no injury whatsoever.
Was only a glancing blow and no worse than the jumper punch he gave back to Westhoff
Geez wouldnt mind giving you one of them glancing blows Jimbo![]()
I hadnt seen it until last night. Watched it a few times, and the contact wasnt that glancing at all and only by pure luck didnt it break his jaw, seen less cause more damage thats for sure.
Did the Mckernan which was higher impact that westoff's i agree and other mentioned incidents cause injury?
by Footy Smart » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:19 am
Jim05 wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Im an Essendon member and I think Westhoff should of got off.
Hooker made of meal of it and went fown like he was shot. He suffered no injury whatsoever.
Was only a glancing blow and no worse than the jumper punch he gave back to Westhoff
Geez wouldnt mind giving you one of them glancing blows Jimbo![]()
I hadnt seen it until last night. Watched it a few times, and the contact wasnt that glancing at all and only by pure luck didnt it break his jaw, seen less cause more damage thats for sure.
Did the Mckernan which was higher impact that westoff's i agree and other mentioned incidents cause injury?
Hooker has said he didnt feel anything and it was by instinct he went to ground.
Was dumb by Westhoff but due to his good record I felt a reprimand would of been sufficient.
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Jul 10, 2013 11:31 am
by JK » Wed Jul 10, 2013 12:41 pm
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 10, 2013 12:51 pm
by toot toot » Wed Jul 10, 2013 4:50 pm
Footy Smart wrote:
on another note, on 360 last night Gerard came up with a good example of how the MRP and Tribunal system should be set up and if only the AFL would listen to it. Did anyone else see it? he gave good examples i thought as well. It would mean th Zeibel, Brown, Westoff pentalies are consistant for what they are not what it is interpreted to be.
by whufc » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:22 pm
toot toot wrote:Footy Smart wrote:
on another note, on 360 last night Gerard came up with a good example of how the MRP and Tribunal system should be set up and if only the AFL would listen to it. Did anyone else see it? he gave good examples i thought as well. It would mean th Zeibel, Brown, Westoff pentalies are consistant for what they are not what it is interpreted to be.
Yep saw this, best solution to the MRP I've heard. Really like Gerard's views on most things, talks a lot of sense.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |