Page 10 of 10

Re: St Kilda 2013

PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 1:54 pm
by dedja
Not officially ...

Re: St Kilda 2013

PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 4:59 pm
by Squids
Jim05 wrote:
Booney wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Ahmed Saad gets a 18 month suspension for his drug charges

disgrace. bit harsh of a ban...
so he accidently takes something and get 18 months, gee when/if they start handing out infraction notices to the bombers who willingly took banned drugs, there penalty MUST be more then Saads...


Certainly sets a precedence, doesn't it?

Think your missing the point.
No Essendon player has ever returned a positive test. If they do then they too will deservedly cop a 2 year ban. Id be surprised if anything more than 6-12 months will be dished out unless they have suddenly uncovered some new info


Not like they targeted the drugs the Essendon players took.

Re: St Kilda 2013

PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 5:18 pm
by Jim05
dedja wrote:Not officially ...

Quite possibly.
My understanding is that Saad copped it bad because he actually tested positive on competition day and that carries the max penalty.