SA Footy

I'm doing it wrong then. 3 leg multi it is for me tonight.

Cats by 80+
Hawkins for 6 or more
Dangerfield 40+

13/1

Booney wrote:Hey, he landed it then brilliant for him.

Yeah, I'm sure employment productivity has been at an all time high over the past half an hour

Bum Crack wrote:I'm doing it wrong then. 3 leg multi it is for me tonight.

Cats by 80+
Hawkins for 6 or more
Dangerfield 40+

13/1

Ha, I done the first two and it was at 226's, it wouldn't let me put Danger in.

Bum Crack wrote:I'm doing it wrong then. 3 leg multi it is for me tonight.

Cats by 80+
Hawkins for 6 or more
Dangerfield 40+

13/1

If you just did
Cats win
Danger most possessions GR1
Hawkins most goals GR1
$45
Swap Hawkins for Dixon (both same price) it is $131

Notice how Trader and Dutchy havent posted.... i reckon they are conceding defeat that there is nothing wrong with SGM[emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:I'm doing it wrong then. 3 leg multi it is for me tonight.

Cats by 80+
Hawkins for 6 or more
Dangerfield 40+

13/1

Ha, I done the first two and it was at 226's, it wouldn't let me put Danger in.

LOL

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Notice how Trader and Dutchy havent posted.... i reckon they are conceding defeat that there is nothing wrong with SGM[emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Just catching up now.

And by the way, you'll notice he only did 3 legs, not 10.

3 leg multi

Danger most goals group 1
Danger most possessions group 1
Cats by 25+

357/1

Trader wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Notice how Trader and Dutchy havent posted.... i reckon they are conceding defeat that there is nothing wrong with SGM[emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Just catching up now.

And by the way, you'll notice he only did 3 legs, not 10.

Well he's an idiot because the more you bet the more you win. Everyone knows that.

PS - I used my $20 bonus bet on GWS to win last night so your system is shit too.

Trader wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Notice how Trader and Dutchy havent posted.... i reckon they are conceding defeat that there is nothing wrong with SGM[emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Just catching up now.

And by the way, you'll notice he only did 3 legs, not 10.

Yep, i dont believe 10 legs either.

So the new rule is make sure there are options from both teams[emoji16][emoji16]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Jim05 wrote:I don’t know how it works with Sportsbet but apparently in a SGM if you include 1 leg that is from a different team you get extra. For example I’ve just done a dummy

Port win $1.74
Rockcliff leading possessions GR1 $6
Georgiades leading goals GR1 $12
Payout $101

However change Georgiades to Myers from Geelong who is also $12 and it turns into $226

Correct, it's what is referred to in the industry as an 'accumulator dependency'.

The bookies got wrecked several years ago when some mathematicians teamed up with some political polling groups and worked out fairly quickly that there were a few key seats that would swing the entire election. Eden Monaro for example always fell to the party that happened to win the entire election.

The bookies also knew this, and as such, they had overall markets of roughly $1.90 libs, $1.90 labor, and similarly $1.90 a piece in the Eden Monaro seat, seems fair...... until you multi them up.

Take the libs to win both and you get $3.61, take labor to win both, also at $3.61, sit back and wait for your bet to cash in. (Effectively you've taken $1.805 for the seat to fall to the party that wins overall).

Now repeat that for a number of other key seats and before you know it, even if there is the odd seat that breaks the rules, you make bulk cash.

After that bookies just blocked anything that could be linked for a number of years.

More recently they've sharpened up the algorithm that spits out prices in the same game multi and that gives them protection.
EG: If you pick Hawkins for first goal scorer, then also add in Hawkins anytime goal scorer, the second leg won't increase your price, as it's already happened for the first leg to get up.

Booney wrote:

Trader wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Notice how Trader and Dutchy havent posted.... i reckon they are conceding defeat that there is nothing wrong with SGM[emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Just catching up now.

And by the way, you'll notice he only did 3 legs, not 10.

Well he's an idiot because the more you bet the more you win. Everyone knows that.

PS - I used my $20 bonus bet on GWS to win last night so your system is shit too.

Your fault, I told you to back a long priced option, Sydney at $4.75 is clearly greater than GWS's $1.20 lol

Trader wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Notice how Trader and Dutchy havent posted.... i reckon they are conceding defeat that there is nothing wrong with SGM[emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Just catching up now.

And by the way, you'll notice he only did 3 legs, not 10.

I do minimum of 4 to get my money back if one fails.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Jim05 wrote:I don’t know how it works with Sportsbet but apparently in a SGM if you include 1 leg that is from a different team you get extra. For example I’ve just done a dummy

Port win $1.74
Rockcliff leading possessions GR1 $6
Georgiades leading goals GR1 $12
Payout $101

However change Georgiades to Myers from Geelong who is also $12 and it turns into $226

That makes a bit more sense now as you're sort of betting against yourself.

Yep gives me trhe shits. Quite often ill have about 4 goalkickers in my multi, i like to get up to about 100/1.
If you go total points under with say 4 goalkickers the odds might be 100/1 if you go points over with the same goal kickers it comes down to about 30/1 if your lucky.

Trader wrote:

Booney wrote:

Trader wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Notice how Trader and Dutchy havent posted.... i reckon they are conceding defeat that there is nothing wrong with SGM[emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Just catching up now.

And by the way, you'll notice he only did 3 legs, not 10.

Well he's an idiot because the more you bet the more you win. Everyone knows that.

PS - I used my $20 bonus bet on GWS to win last night so your system is shit too.

Your fault, I told you to back a long priced option, Sydney at $4.75 is clearly greater than GWS's $1.20 lol

Why would anyone use a bonus bet on a $1.20 or even $2 bet?
You'd have to be stupid.....oh hang on never mind carry on

Bum Crack wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:I'm doing it wrong then. 3 leg multi it is for me tonight.

Cats by 80+
Hawkins for 6 or more
Dangerfield 40+

13/1

Ha, I done the first two and it was at 226's, it wouldn't let me put Danger in.

LOL

As much as this was taking the pi55, was actually one of the closest SGM in this thread

Tonight's $3 bet:

Over 129.5
Richmond 25+
Martin most goals G1
Greenwood most disposals G1

$525 return.

Cmon Dusty atleast kick a goal

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Jim05 wrote:One of the blokes called in “sick” today but sent a few of us this

Where is the winning ticket? This just shows a pending one.

Dutchy wrote:

Jim05 wrote:One of the blokes called in “sick” today but sent a few of us this

Where is the winning ticket? This just shows a pending one.

I didn’t bother asking to see it as Kelly had the most touches for the night so it was a given that the leg got up