SA Footy

surely Jonas gets 5-6???

woodublieve12 wrote:surely Jonas gets 5-6???

You would think that.

stan wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:surely Jonas gets 5-6???

You would think that.

He's not that wrong. 4-5 for mine.

regards,

REB

Brodlach wrote:Good on Jonas for fronting the media yesterday, showed some conviction

Yeah hes probably not a typically dirty player as such just made a bad decision. However he still needs tk be accountable as Gaff was knocked out duebtl his brain snap.

stan wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Good on Jonas for fronting the media yesterday, showed some conviction

Yeah hes probably not a typically dirty player as such just made a bad decision. However he still needs tk be accountable as Gaff was knocked out duebtl his brain snap.

wasnt Rance deemed as piss weak for apologizing via a media conference?

marbles wrote:

stan wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Good on Jonas for fronting the media yesterday, showed some conviction

Yeah hes probably not a typically dirty player as such just made a bad decision. However he still needs tk be accountable as Gaff was knocked out duebtl his brain snap.

wasnt Rance deemed as piss weak for apologizing via a media conference?

My thoughts precisely.

marbles wrote:

stan wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Good on Jonas for fronting the media yesterday, showed some conviction

Yeah hes probably not a typically dirty player as such just made a bad decision. However he still needs tk be accountable as Gaff was knocked out duebtl his brain snap.

wasnt Rance deemed as piss weak for apologizing via a media conference?

Reckon I heard/read that both Rance & Jonas contacted the players they hit directly (by phone/text) before the public apology etc via the media. It's all very stage managed, and most likely driven by the big end of town at Docklands. The clubs & the players are puppets.

Jonas did, however, look completely remorseful immediately afterwards.
Even the way he showed little resistance when the Eagles came after him suggested he felt pretty bad about it.

Dogwatcher wrote:Jonas did, however, look completely remorseful immediately afterwards.
Even the way he showed little resistance when the Eagles came after him suggested he felt pretty bad about it.

May, from the Gold Coast, reportedly said to the Brisbane boys after he felled Martin, "Do what you have to lads, I've ****** up"

Dogwatcher wrote:Jonas did, however, look completely remorseful immediately afterwards.
Even the way he showed little resistance when the Eagles came after him suggested he felt pretty bad about it.

I agree with you Dogwatcher, I was not suggesting Jonas wasn't genuine in his apology/s.

Jonas 6 weeks. Could have been 6 to 5 but the tribunals initial interpretation of the event was challenged by Port as it seems according to the media. Interesting to see Port Adelaides reasoning.

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Jonas 6 weeks. Could have been 6 to 5 but the tribunals initial interpretation of the event was challenged by Port as it seems according to the media. Interesting to see Port Adelaides reasoning.

WOW........... 6 weeks!!!
I thought maybe 3 initially.
I guess you hit high, you pay the penalty these days.

amber_fluid wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Jonas 6 weeks. Could have been 6 to 5 but the tribunals initial interpretation of the event was challenged by Port as it seems according to the media. Interesting to see Port Adelaides reasoning.

WOW........... 6 weeks!!!
I thought maybe 3 initially.
I guess you hit high, you pay the penalty these days.

I thought 4-5. Then Port fought it, which made me think 5-6

He was pretty much accused of lying by the tribunal

Jim05 wrote:He was pretty much accused of lying by the tribunal

How so?
What evidence could he give.......... It was plain as day what he did.

Said he was caught between spoiling the ball and bracing for the impact. No surprise they didn't believe that fairytale. Also flies in the face of copping whatever you get when you challenge anything.

helicopterking wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Jonas 6 weeks. Could have been 6 to 5 but the tribunals initial interpretation of the event was challenged by Port as it seems according to the media. Interesting to see Port Adelaides reasoning.

WOW........... 6 weeks!!!
I thought maybe 3 initially.
I guess you hit high, you pay the penalty these days.

I thought 4-5. Then Port fought it, which made me think 5-6

Port didn't fight it, he was referred straight to the tribunal no deals done once at the tribunal.

I think 6 is harsh.

Grahaml wrote:Said he was caught between spoiling the ball and bracing for the impact. No surprise they didn't believe that fairytale. Also flies in the face of copping whatever you get when you challenge anything.

Yeah I just read that as well.
Bullshit.......he never looked like spoiling the ball.

Grahaml wrote:Said he was caught between spoiling the ball and bracing for the impact. No surprise they didn't believe that fairytale. Also flies in the face of copping whatever you get when you challenge anything.

How did he challenge it? He went straight to the tribunal!

They have themselves to blame with the verdict, fancy going in and arguing it was not intentional with this photo doing the rounds and his arms extended on impact