by saintal » Sat Jun 10, 2017 1:45 am
by MW » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:55 am
Dutchy wrote:Time to post a missing persons report on Eddie?
And to think some on here said the Saints could to a Bulldogs this year ....I have never understood the media pumping them up this season.
by MW » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:57 am
by bennymacca » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:04 am
MW wrote:Ling and Bruce banged on and on about the media scrutiny in Adelaide after the Geelong loss, and how it was a mass overreaction to one loss.
Are they kidding?
We have been beaten three times in identical fashion, and just because we have eight wins, we should ignore the losses?
I remember Lingy ripping into the Crows last week at Geelong...he changes his tune at every match.
by MW » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:07 am
by gossipgirl » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:08 am
by JK » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:09 am
MW wrote:Ling and Bruce banged on and on about the media scrutiny in Adelaide after the Geelong loss, and how it was a mass overreaction to one loss.
Are they kidding?
We have been beaten three times in identical fashion, and just because we have eight wins, we should ignore the losses?
I remember Lingy ripping into the Crows last week at Geelong...he changes his tune at every match.
by thegrowler » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:13 am
by bennymacca » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:13 am
JK wrote:MW wrote:Ling and Bruce banged on and on about the media scrutiny in Adelaide after the Geelong loss, and how it was a mass overreaction to one loss.
Are they kidding?
We have been beaten three times in identical fashion, and just because we have eight wins, we should ignore the losses?
I remember Lingy ripping into the Crows last week at Geelong...he changes his tune at every match.
The media has gotten worse with this .. Even on 360 and the Couch they'll rip a side to shreds following a bad loss (Kingy: "Time to gut the list") then throw every superlative at them a week later after a win.
by JK » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:15 am
bennymacca wrote:JK wrote:MW wrote:Ling and Bruce banged on and on about the media scrutiny in Adelaide after the Geelong loss, and how it was a mass overreaction to one loss.
Are they kidding?
We have been beaten three times in identical fashion, and just because we have eight wins, we should ignore the losses?
I remember Lingy ripping into the Crows last week at Geelong...he changes his tune at every match.
The media has gotten worse with this .. Even on 360 and the Couch they'll rip a side to shreds following a bad loss (Kingy: "Time to gut the list") then throw every superlative at them a week later after a win.
They do this every week with Collingwood
by MW » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:16 am
thegrowler wrote:Tyrone Vickery and Kurt Tippett both dropped for this round. Perhaps they can see what we see. They are puss.
by stan » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:22 am
MW wrote:thegrowler wrote:Tyrone Vickery and Kurt Tippett both dropped for this round. Perhaps they can see what we see. They are puss.
Vickery I get. He is just poo.
Tippett I feel was for two reasons. Get him to have a crack in the 2's and get some confidence back but going in too tall against WB in the wet would have been a mistake so leaving him out in that game made sense regardless. He will be back in next game.
by Brodlach » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:24 am
gossipgirl wrote:If the crows keep playing like that will be just making up the numbers in finals .. Assuming they make it. Very disappointing game
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by MW » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:26 am
stan wrote:MW wrote:thegrowler wrote:Tyrone Vickery and Kurt Tippett both dropped for this round. Perhaps they can see what we see. They are puss.
Vickery I get. He is just poo.
Tippett I feel was for two reasons. Get him to have a crack in the 2's and get some confidence back but going in too tall against WB in the wet would have been a mistake so leaving him out in that game made sense regardless. He will be back in next game.
Nankervis came in for him. Pretty sure he is sort of tall-ish
by Brodlach » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:29 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by thegrowler » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:31 am
stan wrote:MW wrote:thegrowler wrote:Tyrone Vickery and Kurt Tippett both dropped for this round. Perhaps they can see what we see. They are puss.
Vickery I get. He is just poo.
Tippett I feel was for two reasons. Get him to have a crack in the 2's and get some confidence back but going in too tall against WB in the wet would have been a mistake so leaving him out in that game made sense regardless. He will be back in next game.
Nankervis came in for him. Pretty sure he is sort of tall-ish
by thegrowler » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:33 am
Brodlach wrote:Nankervis played well too
by thegrowler » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:37 am
Brodlach wrote:gossipgirl wrote:If the crows keep playing like that will be just making up the numbers in finals .. Assuming they make it. Very disappointing game
It's funny I agree with what you are saying but in the end was a 57 point win, reckon I would have taken that at the start of the game and doubling their score
by stan » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:39 am
thegrowler wrote:Brodlach wrote:gossipgirl wrote:If the crows keep playing like that will be just making up the numbers in finals .. Assuming they make it. Very disappointing game
It's funny I agree with what you are saying but in the end was a 57 point win, reckon I would have taken that at the start of the game and doubling their score
I didn't see the game but the Saints must have been putrid for people to be complaining about a ten goal win v a team tipped by most to play finals.
It was doom and gloom when we lost by less than that.
At the end of the year it will be a 10 goal win and look good on paper and be good for percentage. They Can't all be Whitmans chocolates sometimes you have to get your fix on a crown mint.
by thegrowler » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:48 am
stan wrote:thegrowler wrote:Brodlach wrote:gossipgirl wrote:If the crows keep playing like that will be just making up the numbers in finals .. Assuming they make it. Very disappointing game
It's funny I agree with what you are saying but in the end was a 57 point win, reckon I would have taken that at the start of the game and doubling their score
I didn't see the game but the Saints must have been putrid for people to be complaining about a ten goal win v a team tipped by most to play finals.
It was doom and gloom when we lost by less than that.
At the end of the year it will be a 10 goal win and look good on paper and be good for percentage. They Can't all be Whitmans chocolates sometimes you have to get your fix on a crown mint.
The Saints were as you said putrid.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |