SA Footy

Brodlach wrote:

Corona Man wrote:Crows winning no banter from the usual suspects... boring.

What’s worse, Crows winning or no banter?

Corona Man wrote:

Brodlach wrote:

Corona Man wrote:Crows winning no banter from the usual suspects... boring.

What’s worse, Crows winning or no banter?

Crows winning der!

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Thank **** we only played the Dogs. Seriously though if the dogs can only put 2 goals past any AFL team who are literally missing 9 of their first 18 and of those you would say 7 of their best 10 were missing. 1 of those goals was a joke..... Jesus Christ they are garbage.

Crows still in strife.

carey wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Thank **** we only played the Dogs. Seriously though if the dogs can only put 2 goals past any AFL team who are literally missing 9 of their first 18 and of those you would say 7 of their best 10 were missing. 1 of those goals was a joke..... Jesus Christ they are garbage.

Crows still in strife.

Doubt their in strife although the next 6 weeks will really determine where they are at

Melbourne in Alice
Freo away
GWS home
Hawks away
West Coast away
Richmond home

Close
Melbourne in Alice
GWS home
Freo away
Hawks away
Bye
West Coast Home
Richmond away
Cats at home

Tough



Pretty tough 6 weeks. (Bye in the mix somewhere)

amber_fluid wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:sure have, its boring as ****, kick 12 goals and you wont lose too many games, its a borefest, Gimme the days with Lockett Ablett Dunstall any day.
Time for the AFL to stop listening to players and coaches and take the game by the balls, drastic action is required. If they listened to the players it would be unlimited rotations, 20m quarters, a bye every 6 weeks and a 17 game season all while maintaining current levels of income. Flogs like Dangerfield have far too much to say.
Its not called a flood anymore because everyone does it and i dont think the AFL like the term, but thats exactly what it is. Rotations are killing the game across the board from the AFL down to the grassroots level.

If you win a game scoring less than 12 goals you should only get 2 points.
Might make teams more attacking and get back to teams scoring well over 100 points a game.

amber_fluid wrote:Eddie’s a freak!

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Whilst one of Kenilworths finest products talks in Rory Laird, with the sliding rule I have one simple solution. If you get to the footy first and then you collect the opponent then it's play on. Unless it's intentionally malicious like studs up in Soccer then penalise accordingly.

Corona Man wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:Where are all the crows supporters?
Throwing out nibbles and getting nothing!

Benny & MW on self imposed bans, only leaves Broadlach and some dregs I guess. So you are playing to a reduced audience.

PatowalongaPirate wrote:My Friday Forecast -

* Crows out to an early lead that is never under threat About right
* The Bont to play a lone hand for the DogsNot quite but close
* Laird 3 votesIf not 2
* Crows by 41pts37 give you that
* Attendance 44,684 close, would have been spot on if no rain

DOC wrote:

PatowalongaPirate wrote:My Friday Forecast -

* Crows out to an early lead that is never under threat About right
* The Bont to play a lone hand for the DogsNot quite but close
* Laird 3 votesIf not 2
* Crows by 41pts37 give you that
* Attendance 44,684 close, would have been spot on if no rain

carey wrote:

Wedgie wrote:How could anyone not like Eddie? I despise the Crows but love Eddie, I'm not sure how any footy lover could dislike the guy?

Can’t stand his ‘strut’, baggy shorts, American style hand shake bullshit, Tongue out all the time and the fact he has toweled port up a few times.

And I absolutely love footy.