Tasmania Devils

Talk on the national game

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Booney » Wed Jun 04, 2025 11:46 am

All but confirmed, the Greens have publicly stated they'll support the Labor no confidence motion making the stadium a Tasmanian Tiger.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61171
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8101 times
Been liked: 11800 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 04, 2025 11:52 am

Booney wrote:All but confirmed, the Greens have publicly stated they'll support the Labor no confidence motion making the stadium a Tasmanian Tiger.


So they'll be based at Inceston?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53372
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4566 times
Been liked: 8492 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby RB » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:00 pm

In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 6125
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 845 times
Been liked: 1257 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Booney » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:02 pm

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


I'm not sure it's an ultimatum, the terms of entry were negotiated by both parties and the conditions stipulated a roofed stadium.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61171
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8101 times
Been liked: 11800 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:03 pm

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


They wouldn't fill the 19K stadium.

I'd prefer it if they waited and introduced two teams at the same time to keep the one team bye out of our game.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53372
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4566 times
Been liked: 8492 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby wenchbarwer » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:03 pm

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


To channel one of the better AFL ad campaigns:

AFL House staying in their own lane? I'd like to see that!!
wenchbarwer
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2204
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 12:30 pm
Has liked: 1224 times
Been liked: 495 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:03 pm

Booney wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


I'm not sure it's an ultimatum, the terms of entry were negotiated by both parties and the conditions stipulated a roofed stadium.


Should've involved the BBL committee too.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53372
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4566 times
Been liked: 8492 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Jim05 » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:06 pm

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.
The AFL can make all the ultimatums it wants but the government also didn’t have to fold like a deck of cards.
I’ve maintained tight from the start that the AFL didn’t want Tassie in the comp. They made these silly ultimatums thinking it would fall over and reckon they were blindsided by how easy the Tassie government caved in
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48185
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3810 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby stan » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:06 pm

daysofourlives wrote:
whufc wrote:
MW wrote:Would be down to 50/50 that this team actually gets in the league in the end. Can't see a state govt commit to $1bn (with federal help no doubt) to a sports stadium. Would need a shift by the AFL to accept no roof.


I can't see the AFL rejecting the team. Whilst they will throw the blame on the Tassie government the AFL don't come out looking great in this either.

Then throw in the fact every year they don't have a 20th team they are losing money through the TV rights that an extra game would cause. So they need to get to 20 teams as soon as possible and the first step is getting a competitive 19th team.

Most likely outcome will be a tassie team to enter playing at both Hobart and Launceston with the AFL agreeing to some form of extension on a time frame for a new stadium.


Ive said from the start the AFL have no intention of having a team from Tassie, they know the conditions they have set will not be met. A 19th team creates massive issues and no benefits, a 20th team is a pipe dream imo.
At the end of the day a Tassie team will only strip money from their bottom line. It doesnt create any extra games it in fact takes away games that are big money spinners, at least one per week. Even if you look at from not so big matches, like instead of say Essendon playing Bulldogs a 2nd time they now play Tassie, 50k at marvel vs 18k if theyre lucky. It will hit the executives KPI's badly and their bonuses. Its a massive risk to go to 19 without a clear plan for 20. Their bonuses could be hit for 10 years, no one is signing up for that.
The AFL will not budge on the roof
Could this be why the AFL is holding off on making key appointments and or sackings. Waiting for Benny Gale to become available in 6 weeks time
I reckon your on the money here. The AFL know the stadium won't happen and it the put they want.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15467
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1315 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby dedja » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:07 pm

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


Why stop now? They’ve been doing it for years.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23490
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 690 times
Been liked: 1576 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Brodlach » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:15 pm

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.

They are currently spending $100 million on the current stadium now too
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods



2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
User avatar
Brodlach
Coach
 
 
Posts: 49545
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Unley
Has liked: 72 times
Been liked: 4792 times
Grassroots Team: Colonel Light Gardens

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:27 pm

Brodlach wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.

They are currently spending $100 million on the current stadium now too

Drop in the ocean when considering total investment required
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60610
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13295 times
Been liked: 4575 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Dutchy » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:39 pm

Can anyone explain to me why a roof on the new stadium was a non negotiable?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46064
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2598 times
Been liked: 4236 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby dedja » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:39 pm

It’s been a clusterfaark from the day it was conceived, but with Eric Abetz’s involvement, this almost guarantees failure.

If I’m not mistaken, the AFL contribution is a paltry $15M.

A successful no-confidence motion in the Premier will result in an election.

#shambles
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23490
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 690 times
Been liked: 1576 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby RB » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:43 pm

Booney wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


I'm not sure it's an ultimatum, the terms of entry were negotiated by both parties and the conditions stipulated a roofed stadium.


You're correct - ultimatum was the wrong word.

Imposing overly-strenuous conditions is perhaps a better way of phrasing it, noting that as someone pointed out, the government folding like a deck of cards doesn't help.

The AFL have received enough public money as it is.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 6125
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 845 times
Been liked: 1257 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby dedja » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:45 pm

Not to mention the AFL’s not for profit status …
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23490
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 690 times
Been liked: 1576 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby RB » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:45 pm

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.

They are currently spending $100 million on the current stadium now too

Drop in the ocean when considering total investment required
How much investment do you think is required?
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 6125
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 845 times
Been liked: 1257 times

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Brodlach » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:50 pm

RB wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.

They are currently spending $100 million on the current stadium now too

Drop in the ocean when considering total investment required
How much investment do you think is required?

My point was why spend the $100 million if they are not going to play there much longer
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods



2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
User avatar
Brodlach
Coach
 
 
Posts: 49545
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Unley
Has liked: 72 times
Been liked: 4792 times
Grassroots Team: Colonel Light Gardens

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby mots02 » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:55 pm

Dutchy wrote:Can anyone explain to me why a roof on the new stadium was a non negotiable?


Particularly when the roof rules out international cricket being played there.

A nice stadium, completely surrounded by grandstands keeps the bulk of the weather out… particularly with the roof over hangs these days.

They have bloody open air stadiums in Europe and North America playing in the snow.

Dumb ultimatum to have the roof.
User avatar
mots02
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3759
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 190 times
Been liked: 1230 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Tasmania Devils

Postby Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:57 pm

Dutchy wrote:Can anyone explain to me why a roof on the new stadium was a non negotiable?


The neighbours tree drops a lot of leaves.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53372
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4566 times
Been liked: 8492 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Booney and 20 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |