SA Footy

Booney wrote:
Wilson is an interesting one.

Many people despise her, it seems you are one of them, but people in high places decide to pay her (quite handsomely I'd imagine) to ask those questions and do a job. A job she's been doing for years. Journalism isn't a hobby, it's a profession and many of them act in that manner, as professionals.

Mick needs to pull his head in and worry more about coaching his side than biting the head off anyone who dares question him or his actions.

bennymacca wrote:the interesting thing is she was right about all the essendon stuff, even though she had to sustain vitriolic attacks from every essendon supporter

bennymacca wrote:the interesting thing is she was right about all the essendon stuff, even though she had to sustain vitriolic attacks from every essendon supporter

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:So because there are 'identities' who have their agendas, 3/4 are crap?
Do you reckon the majority of journos in those press conferences after a game are the 'identities' driving agendas?
I'm pretty certain, for example, Sam Lienert isn't scum, or a shit bloke.

Even if they are right idiots it is mick's job to be the public face of the club after a loss, and for him to act like he does is embarrassing for both him and the club.

Don't forget it is their job to ask tough questions. If they spent all their time mollycoddling mick jim and others would be the first to say why weren't the tough questions asked

Differance between tough questions and stupid irrelevant ones Benny. How hard is it for some to do a little bit of research or atleast have some questions written down?

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:the interesting thing is she was right about all the essendon stuff, even though she had to sustain vitriolic attacks from every essendon supporter

Not talking about her latest stuff.
She has had a long running feud from the days when her old man was incharge of Richmond. There was also a Essendon board member several years ago that was a friend of hers and was found to be leaking to her, the club sacked her and Wilson has never forgiven us. There was also the fact we sacked her friend Knights as coach which is the reason she hated Hird even before the latest dramas

bennymacca wrote:the interesting thing is she was right about all the essendon stuff, even though she had to sustain vitriolic attacks from every essendon supporter

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:So because there are 'identities' who have their agendas, 3/4 are crap?
Do you reckon the majority of journos in those press conferences after a game are the 'identities' driving agendas?
I'm pretty certain, for example, Sam Lienert isn't scum, or a shit bloke.

Even if they are right idiots it is mick's job to be the public face of the club after a loss, and for him to act like he does is embarrassing for both him and the club.

Don't forget it is their job to ask tough questions. If they spent all their time mollycoddling mick jim and others would be the first to say why weren't the tough questions asked

Differance between tough questions and stupid irrelevant ones Benny. How hard is it for some to do a little bit of research or atleast have some questions written down?

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:the interesting thing is she was right about all the essendon stuff, even though she had to sustain vitriolic attacks from every essendon supporter

Of course she was right, Demetriou was feeding her information every second day

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:the interesting thing is she was right about all the essendon stuff, even though she had to sustain vitriolic attacks from every essendon supporter

Not talking about her latest stuff.
She has had a long running feud from the days when her old man was incharge of Richmond. There was also a Essendon board member several years ago that was a friend of hers and was found to be leaking to her, the club sacked her and Wilson has never forgiven us. There was also the fact we sacked her friend Knights as coach which is the reason she hated Hird even before the latest dramas

Dogwatcher wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:the interesting thing is she was right about all the essendon stuff, even though she had to sustain vitriolic attacks from every essendon supporter

Of course she was right, Demetriou was feeding her information every second day

I'm not a Wilson fan, by any means.
But, I'd reckon if the main man of the organisation on which you are reporting is leaking things to you, you're doing a pretty damn good job.

GWW wrote:I personally prefer Caro, to others such as Hutchy, Mark Stevens, and Damian Barrett.

GWW wrote:I personally prefer Caro, to others such as Hutchy, Mark Stevens, and Damian Barrett.

stan wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:the interesting thing is she was right about all the essendon stuff, even though she had to sustain vitriolic attacks from every essendon supporter

Of course she was right, Demetriou was feeding her information every second day

I'm not a Wilson fan, by any means.
But, I'd reckon if the main man of the organisation on which you are reporting is leaking things to you, you're doing a pretty damn good job.

I would suggest that its more to do with his agenda and not her skills.