by Wedgie » Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:24 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:54 am
CK wrote:hondo71 wrote:Come on Voice - I have heard it called that (or something close to it) by a loud minority
Typical profile = age < 20, has everything they need from parents and don't like sitting in the rain :shock:
Very good point. The current generation that has been brought up with the Docklands stadium of indoor football seems to have this great aversion to sitting in the elements to watch a game and at the first sign of rain, retreat to the loungeroom to watch from there.
As many of us who grew up with SANFL would attest, standing in driving rain, watching your team is part of supporting them. I thought. Seems very odd that many younger fans appear to feel that it's a bridge too far in many ways to cross and don't want to do it.
Time to harden up a bit.
End of rant.
by Gingernuts » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:00 am
Booney wrote:CK wrote:hondo71 wrote:Come on Voice - I have heard it called that (or something close to it) by a loud minority
Typical profile = age < 20, has everything they need from parents and don't like sitting in the rain :shock:
Very good point. The current generation that has been brought up with the Docklands stadium of indoor football seems to have this great aversion to sitting in the elements to watch a game and at the first sign of rain, retreat to the loungeroom to watch from there.
As many of us who grew up with SANFL would attest, standing in driving rain, watching your team is part of supporting them. I thought. Seems very odd that many younger fans appear to feel that it's a bridge too far in many ways to cross and don't want to do it.
Time to harden up a bit.
End of rant.
Spot on CK. Poor people get a bit of rain on them or the seats are too cold. I bet none of the whingers ever went to Waverly Park to see a game. Spoon fed jellybacks. If you want to watch your team you'll go anywhere.
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:13 am
Booney wrote:Spot on CK. Poor people get a bit of rain on them or the seats are too cold. I bet none of the whingers ever went to Waverly Park to see a game. Spoon fed jellybacks. If you want to watch your team you'll go anywhere.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Hondo » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:29 am
Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Spot on CK. Poor people get a bit of rain on them or the seats are too cold. I bet none of the whingers ever went to Waverly Park to see a game. Spoon fed jellybacks. If you want to watch your team you'll go anywhere.
I liked Waverly Park, went there several times. I miss it.![]()
Can we demolish Footy Park and rebuild Waverly?
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:36 am
hondo71 wrote:Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Spot on CK. Poor people get a bit of rain on them or the seats are too cold. I bet none of the whingers ever went to Waverly Park to see a game. Spoon fed jellybacks. If you want to watch your team you'll go anywhere.
I liked Waverly Park, went there several times. I miss it.![]()
Can we demolish Footy Park and rebuild Waverly?
So what's the issue with AAMI if you liked Waverley or are you taking the mickey?
How do facilities at Kardina Park compare to AAMI? (serious question, never been there).
Are you saying you and your dozens are going to become regulars at Crows and Power games when you hate their supporters and hate the teams, just because it's in the city at a new stadium? When I say regulars I mean not 1-2 games on a Friday night. I'm saying every second week at least. Among all those Crows morons and Port ferals just because you seat has a cushion?
I know you'll say yes to this but I won't believe you.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Hondo » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:40 am
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:44 am
hondo71 wrote:Wedgie you're right, those generalisations were completely out of line
Don't know where I'd heard them before?![]()
Oh well, given the Libs aren't even making their CBD Stadium a major election issue (so far) I think it's fair to say you'll be waiting a while yet to take out that Power membership! If we don't get the 2022 Soccer world cup then there's no chance in the next 20 years.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Rik E Boy » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:47 am
Gingernuts wrote:I love sitting in the rain, nothing a decent raincoat and a thermos full of port can't fix!
by Hondo » Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:01 am
Wedgie wrote:The Libs still have it on the cards but I'm guessing they wont get in till the next term. It'll take a few more South Australians to wake up which hasn't quite happened yet.
By that time Adelaide Oval would have been redeveloped and everything will well and truly be ****** up and probably beyond repair.
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:06 am
hondo71 wrote:Wedgie wrote:The Libs still have it on the cards but I'm guessing they wont get in till the next term. It'll take a few more South Australians to wake up which hasn't quite happened yet.
By that time Adelaide Oval would have been redeveloped and everything will well and truly be ****** up and probably beyond repair.
I think the Libs have also realised how many entrenched vested interests exist in the current set-up. It won't happen with SACA and SANFL support and it's proving hard enough to get those 2 parties to share one of their existing grounds let alone a brand new one.
Even if they win many are suggesting the CBD Stadium is still dead unless the soccer world cup comes here. In fact, some suggest the AO redevelopment is dead unless the world cup comes here. Status quo is emerging as the favourite regardless of who wins the election it seems.
The advantage Melbourne had is that the G is still the prime stadium and Docklands is the boutique one. Here, we'd be setting up the opposite which would render the SACA broke I think?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by nuggety goodness » Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:49 pm
Wedgie wrote:hondo71 wrote:Wedgie wrote:The Libs still have it on the cards but I'm guessing they wont get in till the next term. It'll take a few more South Australians to wake up which hasn't quite happened yet.
By that time Adelaide Oval would have been redeveloped and everything will well and truly be ****** up and probably beyond repair.
I think the Libs have also realised how many entrenched vested interests exist in the current set-up. It won't happen with SACA and SANFL support and it's proving hard enough to get those 2 parties to share one of their existing grounds let alone a brand new one.
Even if they win many are suggesting the CBD Stadium is still dead unless the soccer world cup comes here. In fact, some suggest the AO redevelopment is dead unless the world cup comes here. Status quo is emerging as the favourite regardless of who wins the election it seems.
The advantage Melbourne had is that the G is still the prime stadium and Docklands is the boutique one. Here, we'd be setting up the opposite which would render the SACA broke I think?
Yeah, it wouldn't suprise me, we're experts at going nowhere and doing nothing or going backwards in this state. Next someone will come up with the idea of putting a hospital in the busiest part of town.
by the big bang » Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:10 pm
CK wrote:hondo71 wrote:Come on Voice - I have heard it called that (or something close to it) by a loud minority
Typical profile = age < 20, has everything they need from parents and don't like sitting in the rain :shock:
Very good point. The current generation that has been brought up with the Docklands stadium of indoor football seems to have this great aversion to sitting in the elements to watch a game and at the first sign of rain, retreat to the loungeroom to watch from there.
As many of us who grew up with SANFL would attest, standing in driving rain, watching your team is part of supporting them. I thought. Seems very odd that many younger fans appear to feel that it's a bridge too far in many ways to cross and don't want to do it.
Time to harden up a bit.
End of rant.
by Voice » Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
CK wrote:hondo71 wrote:Come on Voice - I have heard it called that (or something close to it) by a loud minority
Typical profile = age < 20, has everything they need from parents and don't like sitting in the rain :shock:
Very good point. The current generation that has been brought up with the Docklands stadium of indoor football seems to have this great aversion to sitting in the elements to watch a game and at the first sign of rain, retreat to the loungeroom to watch from there.
As many of us who grew up with SANFL would attest, standing in driving rain, watching your team is part of supporting them. I thought. Seems very odd that many younger fans appear to feel that it's a bridge too far in many ways to cross and don't want to do it.
Time to harden up a bit.
End of rant.
by dedja » Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:18 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |